Earlier quoted context omitted.
>>Content owners have - in principle, legally backed - the right to distribute their content in any way they see fit, and content consumers have the option to refuse that content if the format it is presented in is un-acceptable to them, this is a consensual producer-consumer relationship. you are giving content "owners" (and I use that term losely, because legally they are Copyright Holders not owners, copyright is…
Don't buy blueray discs and don't use Midori, don't use any content at all that is DRM encumbered. Yes, that will limit your choice but so what, if enough people do it the coin will drop. That's my solution to this whole DRM issue and I've yet to find a 'must-see' thing that was DRM encumbered. Copyright law gives rights-holders all kinds of options, and digital tools have given them options to make it harder to do s…
Personally I stopped eating meat, and just this is quite a cost in additional constraints in your life, because society is designed in a way and doing something different requires extra efforts.
Yes, boycotting something you don't want is a good move, but if you apply it to all things you want to protest against you will no longer be part of society.
So you can't only rely on that. It can't be the only answer. We need to take stand to also refuse those bad moves, especially before they happen.