Earlier quoted context omitted.
I usually rate one star when an app I'm using tries to force me to review when I'm in the middle of trying to use it.
Generally that survey result get discarded; one big trick used by many apps is to have surveys that distract you away from leaving negative results in the appstore or other places where the survey result actually counts.
Google Has Started Penalizing Mobile Websites with Intrusive Pop-Up Ads
281–290 of 406 posts
Re: Google Has Started Penalizing Mobile Websites with Intrusive Pop-Up Ads
#282Earlier quoted context omitted.
They probably think they have to give their email to see the site. We are power users, a lot of people have no idea what they're doing on the web.
Yes, I even think there's a large amount of users that, when shown a random popup "please enter your password to continue", would just enter the password they use for every service, making phishing quite trivial.
Re: Google Has Started Penalizing Mobile Websites with Intrusive Pop-Up Ads
#283Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Here's the thing: I don't care. You will care when nobody's in the business of providing hotel/restaurant/etc reviews...except Google.
If google does a good eough job, then may be i will continue not to care?
Re: Google Has Started Penalizing Mobile Websites with Intrusive Pop-Up Ads
#284Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unfortunately the info typically is on that page, just not complete - and you want more and Google knows it's the way to that information, so results are largely correct, no? If those sites show something else to you than they show to Google Bot, that's against Google's policy and they should be penalized, so I'm assuming they aren't. If energy required to get to the information you need through that path is too much…
Let's take a look at Quora's case. Please do the following: 1. Open your mobile browser. 2. Ask a question on Google and add "quora" so you get some results. 3. Open Quora's result link 4. See that result for a brief second and 5. Be forwarded to registration page, which doesn't have any close or cancel out buttons. 6. Try tapping back and you are back to Google results 7. Curse at Quora and never tap on their result…
Also, google bot would be redirected too, unless of course it's simply logged in :)
Re: Google Has Started Penalizing Mobile Websites with Intrusive Pop-Up Ads
#285Re: Google Has Started Penalizing Mobile Websites with Intrusive Pop-Up Ads
#286Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unfortunately the info typically is on that page, just not complete - and you want more and Google knows it's the way to that information, so results are largely correct, no? If those sites show something else to you than they show to Google Bot, that's against Google's policy and they should be penalized, so I'm assuming they aren't. If energy required to get to the information you need through that path is too much…
Let's take a look at Quora's case. Please do the following: 1. Open your mobile browser. 2. Ask a question on Google and add "quora" so you get some results. 3. Open Quora's result link 4. See that result for a brief second and 5. Be forwarded to registration page, which doesn't have any close or cancel out buttons. 6. Try tapping back and you are back to Google results 7. Curse at Quora and never tap on their result…
Following Bartosz Goralewicz's post about how well botting works to manipulate Google in...2014 I think? there's a small black hat industry that's sprung up around imitating this kind of user reaction, and it does reportedly work to remove pages from Google. I've had my suspicions that it's been used against sites I've worked on a few times (2 or 3).
TL:DR; Quora should generally not be ranking so well (but Google's complex enough to be unpredictable on a page-by-page basis these days).
Re: Google Has Started Penalizing Mobile Websites with Intrusive Pop-Up Ads
#287Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's take a look at Quora's case. Please do the following: 1. Open your mobile browser. 2. Ask a question on Google and add "quora" so you get some results. 3. Open Quora's result link 4. See that result for a brief second and 5. Be forwarded to registration page, which doesn't have any close or cancel out buttons. 6. Try tapping back and you are back to Google results 7. Curse at Quora and never tap on their result…
I do not see steps 4-7. After 3, I stay on that page. Sometimes in the past I would see an overlay on that page. I don't get redirected anywhere, and I'm 100% sure I never was (there was only popup). I wonder where's the discrepancy coming from. Also, google bot would be redirected too, unless of course it's simply logged in :)
Here is a screenshot of the page I am being forwarded to automatically: http://pho.to/Aatuj
It is a disguised register page because after you make 10 selections, you are forced to sign up.
Re: Google Has Started Penalizing Mobile Websites with Intrusive Pop-Up Ads
#288Earlier quoted context omitted.
Generally that survey result get discarded; one big trick used by many apps is to have surveys that distract you away from leaving negative results in the appstore or other places where the survey result actually counts.
I'm not sure I understand, they proxy the reviews?
Re: Google Has Started Penalizing Mobile Websites with Intrusive Pop-Up Ads
#289I really would like to see Google penalize websites that force you to login after google showed these websites in the results. 1. Take Linkedin for example: you search for a person on google; google shows a linkedin result; you go to linkedin but you are greeted with giant popup asking you to login to view info. Ridiculous. 2. Same with Quora: they come in results with basic info, but when you go to their page, they…
So why aren't they burying sites that DISABLE ZOOMING?
There's no excuse for disabling crucial browser functionality that has been standard for almost a decade.
Oh wait: That's because Google is a bunch of hypocrites. They disable zooming on THEIR OWN MOBILE SITES, making them distinctly mobile-UNFRIENDLY.
Re: Google Has Started Penalizing Mobile Websites with Intrusive Pop-Up Ads
#290Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think this is related to my fundamental problem with A/B testing: when people A/B test individual variables they'll take a greedy optimization that gets stuck in local minima. The other problem is that you only understand the change in metrics you measure and things like "satisfaction" are often lost.
> greedy optimization that gets stuck in local minima I think you wanted to say local maxima , but yes I agree.