There is another big reason why Snowden may have chosen HK. A few months ago the HK high court ruled that the process for applying for asylum needs overhaul, and until that happens all extradition proceedings for asylum seekers are on hold. So Snowden simply needs to apply for asylum in HK to significantly delay things: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific... I haven't seen much coverage of th…
Choosing Hong Kong Is a Brilliant Move by Edward Snowden
271–280 of 311 posts
Re: Choosing Hong Kong Is a Brilliant Move by Edward Snowden
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like movies, do you?
Taiwan Would that do? Yep, I think it would. Perhaps even just the substantial delay of new arms sales. It's meant as a black and white example, but it proves my point. There are countless things the US could give China that are worth a lot more to China than Snowden is. Your comment is comical in its lack of realism. And that's comical because you're alluding to me being the unrealistic one. In reality, politics is…
Re: Choosing Hong Kong Is a Brilliant Move by Edward Snowden
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Snowden is not proficient in Chinese, no way. (I am, by test.) Sorry, if it sounds personal but I have to ask: How do you know he's not proficient and what does your proficiency have to do with it?
Sorry, if it sounds personal but I have to ask: How do you know he's not proficient and what does your proficiency have to do with it? I have a basis of knowledge about how language proficiency is defined (the federal government in the United States has a standard rating scale of foreign language proficiency, as do most other countries with an active diplomatic corps and military alliances with other countries) and I…
wow. Err... aren't there other ways how to learn a language than government sanctioned programs? How about attending lectures in the evenings and a Chinese speaking friend (not that unbelievable in Hawaii).
Re: Choosing Hong Kong Is a Brilliant Move by Edward Snowden
#274Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not being entirely serious (hard to be, given the little we know) but I'm not being sarcastic, either. Some of Snowden's behaviour has been pretty odd. A variety of interpretations are possible. One is that he's a mastermind media manipulator/intelligence operator/exploiter of immigration laws/meticulous planner of a fugitive. This idea has some traction on HN and outside but I'm pretty skeptical of it. The inter…
I think the most salient point is that he needed to go to a country where - the US did not have significant influence - could not be strong-armed into giving him up - would cause significant problems if he were taken without consent (or killed outright - not implausible, given the things we've seen in Pakistan) China is a fairly logical choice - it's as far as you can run from the US in geopolitical terms. Hong Kong…
Even if Hong Kong has lots of practical concerns because of its relationship with China it was obviously going to provoke obvious questions about idealistic / vs ulterior motives, a big negative I would think for someone acting from idealistic motivations and knowing from experience how much that would be questioned.
I'm inclined to agree with Glurgh's comment and Occam's razor -- he's surely bright, but doesn't necessarily seem to be some type of master manipulator / strategist to have ended up in Hong Kong at this point, good cell phone access aside.
Re: Choosing Hong Kong Is a Brilliant Move by Edward Snowden
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess my point is that there would be severe ramifications if the US deployed its military to retrieve Snowden within Chinese territory. Whether they'd do it or not is not the issue - Snowden is a whistle blower who's had a peak inside the system, and is paranoid (perhaps justifiably given what he was leaking) about his safety. We're only trying to explain his choice, not whether it was a good one. edit: also, the…
I don't want to bury you in some dreary repeat wall of text so I sort of combine-replied to you in the response to the upthread poster. As to the quality of his choices, I think that's the actual interesting thing - not whether we can come up with some semi-plausible theory for them. Are his choices a part of some grand strategy (like the article we're discussing seems to suggest) or are they haphazard? To me, the ev…
Defend ideals and the civil liberties that cost so much to achieve, but China or a controlled territory seems a terrible place to make that stand.
Re: Choosing Hong Kong Is a Brilliant Move by Edward Snowden
#276Earlier quoted context omitted.
So if China solves its three biggest, most intractable problems, it'll be a great place to live? No problem.
No problem, as long as you're not an ethnic or religious minority.
Re: Choosing Hong Kong Is a Brilliant Move by Edward Snowden
#277Re: Choosing Hong Kong Is a Brilliant Move by Edward Snowden
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't believe there is any country in the world, except Russia and China, that will not kowtow to US when pressured. Snowden made a very smart choice by going to HK.
Can we add Ecuador to that list? Say what you will about the current administration, they are not kowtowing to the US or Britain even under a lot of pressure.
Re: Choosing Hong Kong Is a Brilliant Move by Edward Snowden
#279Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like movies, do you?
Taiwan Would that do? Yep, I think it would. Perhaps even just the substantial delay of new arms sales. It's meant as a black and white example, but it proves my point. There are countless things the US could give China that are worth a lot more to China than Snowden is. Your comment is comical in its lack of realism. And that's comical because you're alluding to me being the unrealistic one. In reality, politics is…
Re: Choosing Hong Kong Is a Brilliant Move by Edward Snowden
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't need to resort to insults.
HN has been especially frustrating for the last 2 weeks. Maybe, instead of hoping that people will maintain perfect civility throughout a nonstop stream of political discussions, something could instead be done to ratchet back the politics on HN?
Although yeah, implying that blacks in the American South in the mid-20th C could rely on the justice system is ridiculous enough to force me to agree with rayiner for once.