Live data from Hacker News

White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”

petitions.whitehouse.gov

271–280 of 284 posts

Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”

#271
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This isn't really about cell phones, it's about copyright and how copyright laws apply to physical devices that you own. The fact that the devices in question happen to use public airwaves is incidental. IMHO, I should be able to hack my WiFi-only iPad and my XBox without risking criminal prosecution.

Cell phone locking has absolutely nothing to do with copyright. It is absurd that copyright law applies to unlocking/locking a cell phone.

It doesn't have anything to do with copyright, nor is it illegal. Someone started a rumour and people keep repeating it ad nauseam.

Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cushman, you sound like somebody who believes everything that you were taught in school, and you are unwilling to entertain an idea that has the possibility of destroying the foundation of your world view. Don't try to impose your world view on events as they occur, rather, observe the world and consider all possibilities. Things usually are not what they appear to be. The expert is not always right, even if he think…

I am most certainly not an idealist, but I take it as a compliment to be called one.

I don't think arthurrr called you an idealist. Naive, maybe.

Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”

#274
post #105

The White House answered an entirely different question from the one asked! Emphasis mine: * "And if you have paid for your mobile device, and aren't bound by a service agreement or other obligation , you should be able to use it on another network." * "...neither criminal law nor technological locks should prevent consumers from switching carriers when they are no longer bound by a service agreement or other obligat…

Huh? As others have said, if you are bound by a service agreement or other obligation then you won't be going to another carrier anyway. That's all they're trying to say. You're being needlessly dramatic.

Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”

#275
post #273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am most certainly not an idealist, but I take it as a compliment to be called one.

I don't think arthurrr called you an idealist. Naive, maybe.

Well, let's agree to disagree.

Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”

#276

What's this fuss about petitions? Last time I checked, the form of government in the US was a republic, that is the offices of government are appointed by and derive their legitimacy from the people as a whole. We as a people should not have to petition the White House to grow sense and pass sensible laws, in the way one petitions a monarch. This is the wrong way of combating the laws that come out of Congress thanks…

To the contrary, the right to petition the government is one of the key points in the Declaration of Independence and is boldly enshrined within the first amendment to the US constitution (without which the Constitution would not have been adopted).

Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”

#277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those are civil suits - not criminal enforcement that the administration could choose to pursue or not

Sklyarov was arrested.

Is that the part of the DMCA we're talking about here?

Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”

#279
post #105

The White House answered an entirely different question from the one asked! Emphasis mine: * "And if you have paid for your mobile device, and aren't bound by a service agreement or other obligation , you should be able to use it on another network." * "...neither criminal law nor technological locks should prevent consumers from switching carriers when they are no longer bound by a service agreement or other obligat…

Also, "We totally agree that Congress should do something about that. Not us though. We're not gonna do anything."

You realize that that's the system of government we have in the United States, right?

Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”

#280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, "We totally agree that Congress should do something about that. Not us though. We're not gonna do anything."

You realize that that's the system of government we have in the United States, right?

You realize that the Librarian of Congress serves at the pleasure of the president, right?
Post reply on HN