Earlier quoted context omitted.
This isn't really about cell phones, it's about copyright and how copyright laws apply to physical devices that you own. The fact that the devices in question happen to use public airwaves is incidental. IMHO, I should be able to hack my WiFi-only iPad and my XBox without risking criminal prosecution.
Cell phone locking has absolutely nothing to do with copyright. It is absurd that copyright law applies to unlocking/locking a cell phone.
White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”
271–280 of 284 posts
Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”
#272Where were they when it passed? sleeping?
Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cushman, you sound like somebody who believes everything that you were taught in school, and you are unwilling to entertain an idea that has the possibility of destroying the foundation of your world view. Don't try to impose your world view on events as they occur, rather, observe the world and consider all possibilities. Things usually are not what they appear to be. The expert is not always right, even if he think…
I am most certainly not an idealist, but I take it as a compliment to be called one.
Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”
#274The White House answered an entirely different question from the one asked! Emphasis mine: * "And if you have paid for your mobile device, and aren't bound by a service agreement or other obligation , you should be able to use it on another network." * "...neither criminal law nor technological locks should prevent consumers from switching carriers when they are no longer bound by a service agreement or other obligat…
Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”
#275Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”
#276What's this fuss about petitions? Last time I checked, the form of government in the US was a republic, that is the offices of government are appointed by and derive their legitimacy from the people as a whole. We as a people should not have to petition the White House to grow sense and pass sensible laws, in the way one petitions a monarch. This is the wrong way of combating the laws that come out of Congress thanks…
Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”
#277Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”
#278Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”
#279The White House answered an entirely different question from the one asked! Emphasis mine: * "And if you have paid for your mobile device, and aren't bound by a service agreement or other obligation , you should be able to use it on another network." * "...neither criminal law nor technological locks should prevent consumers from switching carriers when they are no longer bound by a service agreement or other obligat…
Also, "We totally agree that Congress should do something about that. Not us though. We're not gonna do anything."
Re: White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal”
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also, "We totally agree that Congress should do something about that. Not us though. We're not gonna do anything."
You realize that that's the system of government we have in the United States, right?