The only mistake Flock has made in terms of general acceptance is leaving them closed-access. The right way to build this empire is to set all the cameras as public. When they're wide-open and everybody is free to watch (along with ads, of course) not enough will care about the privacy because they want to track their cheating boyfriend, Amazon delivery, and get live traffic and weather info.
Lawmakers added $1 to car insurance policies. That money paid for Flock cameras
271–280 of 325 posts
Re: Lawmakers added $1 to car insurance policies. That money paid for Flock cameras
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds like Texas is the place for you.
No, I think their civil forfeiture rates are quite a bit higher than average. Property taxes too. Quite a bit of fearless thievery going on in Texas.
Re: Lawmakers added $1 to car insurance policies. That money paid for Flock cameras
#273Re: Lawmakers added $1 to car insurance policies. That money paid for Flock cameras
#274Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't "crime, done with the involvement of a firearm" also often more harshly punished than the plain crime itself? If a burglar is targeting empty houses, this would give them a strong incentive to not bring a firearm, just in case they get caught. As the saying goes, only break one law at a time!
Yes burglary with weapons is called robbery and is treated as a more serious crime with a higher punishments in a lot of jurisdiction
Re: Lawmakers added $1 to car insurance policies. That money paid for Flock cameras
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
people freqently conflate Stand Your Ground vs Duty to Retreat... with the entire rest of the debate. I'm trying to keep this neutral, so I'm using a rather cut and dry example: Somebody kicks in your door with a pump action and starts shooting- There are _some_ jurisdictions that require you to try and flee. You kill them and they werent bodily blocking your car in? Murder charge. investigation finds a sabatoged eng…
Your example isn't quite as cut-and-dry because in a lot of cases that's going to involve the Castle Doctrine as well, and "starts shooting" means there is an actual danger merely than a perceived potential danger. Counter-example: You're walking on the streets, at night, in the "bad part" of town. Someone walks towards you with their hands in their pockets, and their head covered with a hoodie. They say "Hey, what a…
Re: Lawmakers added $1 to car insurance policies. That money paid for Flock cameras
#276Strange that someone else’s question “Did it reduce catalytic converter theft?”, directly relevant to the article, got downvoted to death. Not sure if we’re meant to have discussions here or just dutifully complain about topics that are fashionable to complain about.
Sadly that's very common on HN today. I commented under a post about some skill claiming to unleash the superpower of Claude Code. I asked, is there any evidence aka benchmark that shows it's any better than vanilla Claude Code that is statistically significant? Dead silence. But not downvotes -- easily got to -4. SMH.
There are also a ton of one-line comments now, some that get upvoted to the top. That's 100 percent Reddit and 0 percent intellect.
Re: Lawmakers added $1 to car insurance policies. That money paid for Flock cameras
#277Earlier quoted context omitted.
You want thieves to be armed?
They frequently already are. Even here in Canada[1] where any kind of "carry" is generally not allowed. Shockingly, thieves often don't care about gun laws though. [1] https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/toronto-police-cash-r...
Re: Lawmakers added $1 to car insurance policies. That money paid for Flock cameras
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Hey, knock it off. People are going to disagree and we need to respect each other in so doing. Since you’re apparently new here, please familiarize yourself with the HN Guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html “Edit out swipes.”
You can choose to rationalize the actions of fascists all you want, but the rest of the world is not obligated to respect you for it.
In my country we have a word that roughly translates to “lackey to those in power”, but I think I prefer the American English pejorative “bootlicker”.
Re: Lawmakers added $1 to car insurance policies. That money paid for Flock cameras
#279Earlier quoted context omitted.
In other words: don't be an idiot and call the cops instead. That's what they are supposed to be for!
Texas cops? The ones that stop parents from saving their children during school shootings?
Just a year later during the mall shooting in Allen Texas, cops took down the white supremacist, neo-nazi perpetrator in under 5 minutes, probably saving at least a co couple dozen lives (he’d already killed 9). You can watch the bodycam footage from that event if there’s any doubt
Re: Lawmakers added $1 to car insurance policies. That money paid for Flock cameras
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hey, knock it off. People are going to disagree and we need to respect each other in so doing. Since you’re apparently new here, please familiarize yourself with the HN Guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html “Edit out swipes.”
Spare me the dang cosplay. You can choose to rationalize the actions of fascists all you want, but the rest of the world is not obligated to respect you for it. In my country we have a word that roughly translates to “lackey to those in power”, but I think I prefer the American English pejorative “bootlicker”.