Live data from Hacker News

Claude.ai unavailable and elevated errors on the API

status.claude.com

271–277 of 277 posts

Re: Claude.ai unavailable and elevated errors on the API

#271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I led the team that did the math and analysis for determining our direction in selecting Anthropic. We initially assumed this was where we would end up, but after some investment exploring our options we found it not worth the trouble. Local models sound great until you realize you dont get alot of the features that we implicitly expect from hosted models. Many things would require additional investment into the oper…

I don't blame you. I personally would consider revisiting it in the next month or so. A lot of people are saying some of these smaller models like qwen 3.6 are basically at Claude sonnet performance if not better. That level of hardware, if the performance was enough is a much smaller investment and gamble. Either way I understand the decision. Your product isn't in locally hosted LLMs, why fuss. That said I see 1 mi…

[dead]

Re: Claude.ai unavailable and elevated errors on the API

#272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

pi for the win, i have my own ai extend it when i want more specific features. vibe coded in 20 minutes shift+tab like claude code to add permission control.

I find it so funny that many of these harnesses sound like black magic and are completely mystical to me. I use Claude Code every day and yet i can't imagine the workflow of Pi. I also don't care to pay API rates just to experiment with them. Largely though i'm happy with Claude Code w\ IDE integration, so i don't feel the need to migrate. Nonetheless i'm curious.

I have enterprise so its always usage which makes it possible for me. And then the other subs I can toggle between which is awesome.

I live in the terminal. Before AI I always preferred it so it suits me

Re: Claude.ai unavailable and elevated errors on the API

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ummmmmm, how?

I searched his HackerNews username on Google. [0] - https://github.com/cartazio/oh-punkin-pi

yup thats mine. :) i actually had some stuff layered into mono pi, and i frankly hit my limit in terms of architecture issues in monopi, omp aka oh my pi is frankly better architectured. if you pared back the fearure set to be minimal, you would full stop have a better designed minimal harness.

i do have a proper next gen no slop harness in the work.

amusingly , dog fooding existing tools with my improvements layered in, has repeatedly validated my design choices and if anything has reduced my tolerance for the errors that seem to happen in vanilla or first party harnesses

Post reply on HN