Founder of GitLab battles cancer by founding companies
271–280 of 285 posts
Re: Founder of GitLab battles cancer by founding companies
#272Re: Founder of GitLab battles cancer by founding companies
#273This man is incredible. I wish I was 10% as smart, resilient, resourceful and determined as he is. Truly amazing stuff.
I'm pretty sure you already are. He's just rich.
Re: Founder of GitLab battles cancer by founding companies
#274Earlier quoted context omitted.
This reminded me of my own story, when I was 15 and had phimosis. I was embarrassed to talk about it with anyone, so in my desperation I posted about it on a forum that claimed to help kids in need of help. Someone responded and gave me instructions that they claimed had a high success rate at treating the condition. I followed the instructions for a few months and it fixed it. I went back and sent the biggest thanks…
What instructions were you given?
Re: Founder of GitLab battles cancer by founding companies
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
Such an inspiring read. As a bioinformatics researcher I'm awed by the depth of the deck. How do feel about the process of learning cancer biology and bioinformatics? Ps. I work for BillionToOne oncology and we build some of the most sensitive liquid biopsy tests ( https://www.northstaronc.com/ ). Feel free to reach out if it pique your interest!
It wasn’t easy to learn it while dealing with the side effects of chemo. But AI helped a lot, also see the OpenAI forum talked linked on the page. Love BillionToOne, also see https://osteosarc.com/timeline/ MRD Northstar for my results with it.
Re: Founder of GitLab battles cancer by founding companies
#276Re: Founder of GitLab battles cancer by founding companies
#277Re: Founder of GitLab battles cancer by founding companies
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> Fasting (1 to n weeks) is said to provide potential benefits for certain types of cancer treatments. Pre-cancer, it is said to potentially prevent cancer onset. This is potentially powerful for those of us with a family history with cancer. It makes sense. Cells need nutrients for the cell cycle, similar to the way computers need RAM to execute programs. Fasting not only deprives cancer cells of nutrients, but also…
While not all cancers are the same, we cannot ignore the fact that there's a metabolic link to cancer onset and development. Our industrialized food system simply isn't healthy. I don't know how we do it, but there has to be a way to alter behavioral patterns (nutrition, exercise, visceral fat control, substance abuse, etc.) to actually protect people from both bad inputs and, frankly, themselves.
I don't say "themselves" in the sense of suggesting an overlord scenario. The reality is that most people are ill-informed and our industrialized food system is designed to be supremely addictive. Anyone who has battled with processed food understands just how difficult it can be not to consume it, both from a widespread availability perspective and what it does to your brain.
Despite the fact that treatment options and efficacy have improved, without fixing these factors it will be impossible to win this battle at scale.
Re: Founder of GitLab battles cancer by founding companies
#279Thanks for posting this. Happy to answer questions!
I do have concerns regarding the proposals for scaling personalized medicine. They mostly boil down to "how do you scale the skill set required to operate in high-noise-low-signal domains". In my experience, these are places where poor data/incentives/critical-thinking can easily overshadow the signal; e.g., compelling stories outnumber correct stories.
There seems to be a trade-off: you can walk a bit further than others by keeping the probability distributions for low-quality results in your head, but go too far and everything starts getting overwhelmed by noise. It seems like the FDA's heavy gatekeeping is one way to solve this problem. If you forgo that gatekeeping, then you probably need to deal with the cascading quality issues that result.
Personalized treatments will probably be much harder to evaluate. At least a black-box algorithm that maps `situation → suggested treatment` can have statistics applied to it. But how do you evaluate "individuals made their own decision; here's the list of `situation × outcome`"? Or is the idea that there's currently a wealth of good-solutions, and that we should be relaxing regulations for a while?
Or perhaps we just want to push the regulator burden from "before small trials" to "before medium trials"? Then, these will be treated as case studies: good for experts to pull ideas from, but not high quality evidence for proving anything the third parties? I notice that your diagnostics were numerous, but the treatments were sparse and more sequential than parallel. If that's the norm, then maybe fairly usable data will emerge.
Or do people just have a moral right to seek out their own treatment, regardless of footguns that may be lying in wait? For myself and my loved ones battling cancer, I deeply agree with these:
> Maximize survival instead of the current practice of minimizing liability to the practitioner
> Parallel treatments wherever reasonable, we don't need to know what cured you
But I'm also glad that daily medical decisions are highly standardized and quality-controlled. It makes it easier to trust my doctor (or my loved ones' doctors) without independently investigating each recommendation.
Re: Founder of GitLab battles cancer by founding companies
#280Does the HN title make any sense? What should the "by founding companies" mean?
It makes sense after you understand, but I had to read the headline several times before it parsed.