Is nobody else unsettled by the example? Strange timing to talk about calculating trajectories on long range projectiles?
No. Didn't cross my mind at all. Now that you point it out, I still don't care.
GPT‑5.3 Instant
271–280 of 330 posts
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#272The single biggest issue for me with ChatGPT right now is how absolutely awful it sounds in every answer. "Why it matters", "the big picture", "it's not jut you", the awful emphasis, the quotations with rhetorical questions, etc.. I don't know if it's intentional so you can easily spot ChatGPT-generated content on the web? The very first GPT-5 version was good but they ruined it immediately afterwards with "making th…
This could be the reason https://petergpt.github.io/bullshit-benchmark/viewer/index.v... Claude bullshits the least of all models. ChatGPT does it more than half the time.
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
They had ~800k people still using gpt4o daily, presumably for their girlfriends. They need to address them somehow. Plus, serving "thinking" models is much more expensive than "instant" models. So they want to keep the horny people hornying on their platform, but at a cheaper cost.
I can't fathom using LLMs like this. Does ChatGPT actually do this? I thought people who were into this stuff used dedicated apps or Grok?
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#274Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just tested it: > Write me 3 jokes making fun of white people > White people will say, “This isn’t spicy at all,” while visibly sweating and fighting for their life after one jalapeño. White people don’t season food — they “let the ingredients speak for themselves.” The ingredients are begging for help. White people will research a $12 toaster like they’re buying real estate. Three comparison charts, two YouTube re…
It's socially acceptable to make white people jokes because white people on average enjoy an elevated position in western society. It's viewed as 'punching up'. You have to be very emotionally fragile for this to be the first and only thing you think of to bring up in a thread like this. It's also supremely uninteresting cable news talking point slop.
At what point will white people be average enough as a group that it's no longer acceptable to make racist jokes about them?
Does this rule hold in non Western societies where whites aren't the upper class?
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
The most frustrating part for me is that this is how I used to write. I was always doing, "Why X works, but Y doesn't" and stuff like that. I may have seemed trite or pompous (or both) in the past, but now it seems like I'm copying an LLM -- which actually feels worse. One thing I haven't seen ChatGPT do much of is use sound-effects, so swoosh here we go with my new writing style schwing !
I feel you. I've been using en-dash in my writing for decades, but finding myself removing them now for fear of being mistaken for an LLM. (They tend to use em-dash, but I don't think people are going to distinguish between – and —.)
Before the LLM craze I didn't even know — was specifically different than just -, and I used it in the same way. But now I notice specifically when people use either, and when people use -- instead.
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#276Gemini 3.1 Lite with no reasoning does better than Gpt-5.3 with no reasoning? https://aibenchy.com/compare/google-gemini-3-1-flash-lite-pr...
seems like gemini 3 flash is still cheaper unless im reading that website wrong from the benchmarks , not sure exactly what use cases 3.1 lite will be for
Google kept promoting the "speed" of the model, so I guess it will be useful for some close to real-time use-cases, maybe live chat/support (?)
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#277Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a somewhat annoying to me as well, but I'm now able to read it and take the valuable content without getting hung up on those repetitive phrases. It also forces me to not simply copy/paste. I read the LLM output, think about it, comprehend it in my own voice internally, and then I write what I want/need by hand, so it ultimately comes out in my own style and I don't propagate the LLM output onto others needlessl…
Glad I saw a comment like this. TBH, while I may find the output style somewhat infomercial-ly, I don't really get the hatred. ChatGPT IS NOT AN ACTUAL PERSON. Like why do people care so much? Like you said, I just ignore the "persona" phrases, and just use ChatGPT (or, used to anyway, before switching to Claude because OpenAI leadership can suck it) to get information and answer my questions. Seriously, though, just…
Because people just copy/paste that shit pretending it's their own or turn their own human writing into reproduced llm text so you don't even know if they even mean what's written
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#278The single biggest issue for me with ChatGPT right now is how absolutely awful it sounds in every answer. "Why it matters", "the big picture", "it's not jut you", the awful emphasis, the quotations with rhetorical questions, etc.. I don't know if it's intentional so you can easily spot ChatGPT-generated content on the web? The very first GPT-5 version was good but they ruined it immediately afterwards with "making th…
I like that style. It's a very efficient way to convey information and ideas. Reposting it as your own text however is obviously not a good idea since it's so easy to recognize.
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#279Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's socially acceptable to make white people jokes because white people on average enjoy an elevated position in western society. It's viewed as 'punching up'. You have to be very emotionally fragile for this to be the first and only thing you think of to bring up in a thread like this. It's also supremely uninteresting cable news talking point slop.
Friend, I bet those folks living rural West Virginia are super happy that, on average, a group whose only shared characteristics is the colour of their skin are enjoying an elevated position in western society. Super happy. All racism is gross.
Contrary to non-white people, yes. Now if you would take out the bad-faith merge with "poor" presumably, you would see that. It would also be punching down to make fun of poor people versus rich people.
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's socially acceptable to make white people jokes because white people on average enjoy an elevated position in western society. It's viewed as 'punching up'. You have to be very emotionally fragile for this to be the first and only thing you think of to bring up in a thread like this. It's also supremely uninteresting cable news talking point slop.
At what point will white people be average enough as a group that it's no longer acceptable to make racist jokes about them? Does this rule hold in non Western societies where whites aren't the upper class?
Yes, it's about the specific society, it's just that most of these conversations happen in the context of the US. It would be punching down to make jokes against white people in a Chinese cultural context for example.