Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This breakdown in rule of law is unfortunate. Doesn't breakdown in rule of law happened when a corporation (surely) bribed local officials to install insecure surveillance devices with zero concern for the community living near them?
How many homeowners install mystery-meat Chinese cameras on their houses that feed the data God knows where? Should their homes be vandalized too for their lack of concern for the community?
Americans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras
271–280 of 534 posts
Re: Americans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras
#272Re: Americans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
how did you jump from property damage and arson to speech? non sequitur much? financial damage absolutely can be violence, you can ruin someone's life if you take away their job by burning down the place they work at and it could lead to something horrific like them taking their own lives or not being able to pay for their medication or not be able to pay for their child's education, etc as a direct consequence of yo…
> how did you jump from property damage and arson to speech? I included speech as an example, the same as your bringing up property damage, arson, and financial damage. It seemed relevant given the general shape of what you were expressing. Someone being driven to suicide or unable to pay for medication is not an example of violence. It might be many things but violence is most certainly not one of them. > you cannot…
Re: Americans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras
#274Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It is not ideal, but it is necessary when the higher-desirability options are not working. What has worried me for years is that Americans would not resort to this level. That things are just too comfortable at home to take that brave step into the firing lines of being on the right side of justice but the wrong side of the law. I'm relieved to see more and more Americans causing necessary trouble. I still think th…
You won't get to the kind of change you thought you would see until food runs low and the economy stalls. The American Revolution was rare in that it didn't need to happen. The Founders were just being giant assholes (j/k). While the French Revolution just a few decades later was more status quo. A lot of starvation and poverty just pushed the population over the edge.
- Alfred Henry Lewis
Re: Americans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
What confuses me is that no revolution is required. All we had to do to avoid this was to vote. Voting would still (probably) work.
Not sure if you are aware but we rarely directly get to vote on these things. You vote for a representative and hope they vote in a way that serves your interests. But now, we have omnibus bills. And it's 50/50 loaded with things we want and things we don't. The same bill that funds Pre-K will also have a section to fund a kitten shredding machine. But if you vote against it all voters will hear is how you don't want…
Re: Americans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras
#276Re: Americans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras
#277Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've done this recently. It's only been six weeks so not sure if I'll keep it up, but I have felt very little pain. I put my sim back in my iPhone the other day when I needed an Uber to go to the vet after reading that recently taxis in my city have been denying people with pets even if you tell them you have one when ordering. Sim went right back in my flip phone when I got home and I actually experienced some relie…
Enjoy your portable physical SIM while you can, they are absolutely coming for it
Re: Americans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras
#278Doesn’t that just mean Flock makes more money from making replacements?
All paid for by taxpayers because a few extremists have appointed themselves kings
Re: Americans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras
#279Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ok, you do all that work at home and manage to block flock in your area. It doesn’t matter because the next city over where you work installed them so you get tracked anyway. Then 2 years later a new city council gets elected and they install flock cameras in your city too. You can never get rid of them because it already passed and nobody wants to relitigate the same thing every couple of years. Local politics does…
Our city voted out the cameras so the feds just installed flock cameras on every bit of federal property in and near town, plus they're at private places like hardware stores.
Either that or getting creative with well-directed, statically charged aerosolized oil droplets.
Re: Americans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras
#280Why were those installed in the first place?