Live data from Hacker News

I found a useful Git one liner buried in leaked CIA developer docs

spencer.wtf

271–273 of 273 posts

Re: I found a useful Git one liner buried in leaked CIA developer docs

#271
post #2

I currently have a TUI addiction. Each time I want something to be easier, I open claude-code and ask for a TUI. Now I have a git worktree manager where I can add/rebase/delete. As TUI library I use Textual which claude handles quite well, especially as it can test-run quite some Python code.

> Each time I want something to be easier, I open claude-code and ask for a TUI.

WTF has happened to software development, that anyone thinks they need "AI" for that? Any self-respecting half-way decent IDE has had parameterized templates for that since at least the mid-1990s. (They used to be called "Wizards" on Windows, or "Experts" in the Borland tools.)

Select "File", "New", "[Whatever]", answer a few questions in a (series of) dialog(s), click "Finish", and hey presto!, you had a new project, templated according to your preferences, with the UI scaffolding all finished. (Mostly GUI, of course, since that was the hot new thing back then; but could just as easily have been TUI, and I suppose some had that too.)

All done locally on your stonking new 486 266 Mhz / 16 MB. No need to burn half the planet to run some LLM "in the cloud", i.e. on someone else's machine in a datacenter somewhere. Jeebus fuck, does one have to be labelled "old curmudgeon" just for thinking there's something seriously wrong going on here nowadays?

Re: I found a useful Git one liner buried in leaked CIA developer docs

#272
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you explain TUI? I have never heard this before

Terminal UI.

Textual / Text-based UI used to be more common.

Makes more sense, too: Although you run TUI apps in it, the terminal itself is inherently more of a CLI than a TUI. Makes "terminal" rather misleading, IMO.

Re: I found a useful Git one liner buried in leaked CIA developer docs

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I write the code myself, I'm not worried that I snuck a `git reset --hard` somewhere.

Do you only run code you wrote yourself?

I depend on the community to vet libraries that I add to my stack. The community of people.

When I use AI to write code, I have absolutely no guarantee about what it just did, so I have to read through it all carefully.

Post reply on HN