Live data from Hacker News

Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

claude.com

271–280 of 593 posts

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Frequency vs. convenience will determine how big of a deal this is in practice. Cars have plenty of horror stories associated with them, but convenience keeps most people happily driving everyday without a second thought. Google can quarantine your life with an account ban, but plenty of people still use gmail for everything despite the stories. So even if Claude cowork can go off the rails and turn your digital life…

Considering the ubiquity and necessity of driving cars is overwhelmingly a result of intentional policy choices irrespective of what people wanted or was good for the public interest... actually that's quite a decent analogy for integrated LLM assistants. People will use AI because other options keep getting worse and because it keeps getting harder to avoid using it. I don't think it's fair to characterize that as c…

People love their cars, what are you talking about

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please elaborate

It works on Linux, Windows, macOS, and BSD. It's not locked to Apple's ecosystem. You can back up directly to local storage, SFTP, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure, Google Cloud, and more. Time Machine is largely limited to local drives or network shares. Restic deduplicates at the chunk level across all snapshots, often achieving better space efficiency than Time Machine's hardlink-based approach. All data is encrypted clien…

But I just want to backup my important files to the cloud

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#273
post #24

I was hoping for a moment that this meant they had come up with a design that was safe against lethal trifecta / prompt injection attacks, maybe by running everything in a tight sandbox and shutting down any exfiltration vectors that could be used by a malicious prompt attack to steal data. Sadly they haven't completely solved that yet. Instead their help page at https://support.claude.com/en/articles/13364135-using-…

Worth calling out that execution runs in a full virtual machine with only user-selected folders mounted in. CC itself runs, if the user set network rules, with https://github.com/anthropic-experimental/sandbox-runtime . There is much more to do - and our docs reflect how early this is - but we're investing in making progress towards something that's "safe".

Is it really a VM? I thought CC’s sandbox was based on bubblewrap/seatbelt which don’t use hardware virtualization and share the host OS kernel?

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#274

Hi, Felix from the team here, this is my product - let us know what you think. We're on purpose releasing this very early, we expect to rapidly iterate on it. (We're also battling an unrelated Opus 4.5 inference incident right now, so you might not see Cowork in your client right away.)

Hi Felix! Simple suggestion: logo should be a cow and and orc to match how I originally read the product name.

i too could not resist

https://g.co/gemini/share/6aa102571d75

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#275
post #273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Worth calling out that execution runs in a full virtual machine with only user-selected folders mounted in. CC itself runs, if the user set network rules, with https://github.com/anthropic-experimental/sandbox-runtime . There is much more to do - and our docs reflect how early this is - but we're investing in making progress towards something that's "safe".

Is it really a VM? I thought CC’s sandbox was based on bubblewrap/seatbelt which don’t use hardware virtualization and share the host OS kernel?

Turns out it's a full Linux container run using Apple's Virtualization framework: https://gist.github.com/simonw/35732f187edbe4fbd0bf976d013f2...

Update: I added more details by prompting Cowork to:

> Write a detailed report about the Linux container environment you are running in

https://gist.github.com/simonw/35732f187edbe4fbd0bf976d013f2...

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#276
post #36

It's so important to remember that unlike code which can be reverted - most file system and application operations cannot. There's no sandboxing snapshot in revision history, rollbacks, or anything. I expect to see many stories from parents, non-technical colleagues, and students who irreparably ruined their computer. Edit: most comments are focused on pointing out that version control & file system snapshot exists:…

Once upon a time, in the magical days of Windows 7, we had the Volume Shadow Copy Service (aka "Previous Versions") available by default, and it was so nice. I'm not using Windows anymore, and at least part of the reason is that it's just objectively less feature complete than it used to be 15 years ago.

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#277
post #4

This looks useful for people not using Claude Code, but I do think that the desktop example in the video could be a bit misleading (particularly for non-developers) - Claude is definitely not taking screenshots of that desktop & organizing, it's using normal file management cli tools. The reason seems a bit obvious - it's much easier to read file names, types, etc. via an "ls" than try to infer via an image. But it a…

Maybe at one time, but it absolutely understands images now. In VSCode Copilot, I am working on a python app that generates mesh files that are imported in a blender project. I can take a screenshot of what the mesh file looks like and ask Claude code questions about the object, in context of a Blender file. It even built a test script that would generate the mesh and import it into the Blender project, and render a…

100% confirm Opus 4.5 is very image smart.

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#279

I've been using Claude Code in my terminal like a feral animal for months. Building weird stuff. Breaking things. Figuring it out as I go. Cowork is the nice version. The "here's a safe folder for Claude to play in" version. Which is great! Genuinely. More people should try this. But!!! The terminal lets you do more. It always will. That's just how it works. And when Cowork catches up, you'll want to go further. The…

I've had a similar experience. My sense is that there's no way this isn't how eventually most of knowledge work at the computer is going to work. Not necessarily through a terminal interface, I expect UIs to evolve quite a bit in the next few years, but having an omnipotent agent in the loop to do all of the gluing and gruntwork for you. Seems inevitable.

Re: Cowork: Claude Code for the rest of your work

#280
post #36

It's so important to remember that unlike code which can be reverted - most file system and application operations cannot. There's no sandboxing snapshot in revision history, rollbacks, or anything. I expect to see many stories from parents, non-technical colleagues, and students who irreparably ruined their computer. Edit: most comments are focused on pointing out that version control & file system snapshot exists:…

You make a good point. I imagine that they will eventually add Perforce-style versioning to the product and this issue will be solved.
Post reply on HN