Live data from Hacker News

Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels

grist.org

271–280 of 651 posts

Re: Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels

#271

Germany did one simple thing (uncharacteristically) which is removing all the bureaucracy here. Just go ahead and do it. It's fine. Cost in the article is cited at 550 euro. I just browsed amazon.de and you can buy complete plug and play kits here in Germany for as little as 239 euro. Most kits are priced between 300-350 euro. I did not see a many kits over 500. I pay about 70 euro per month for electricity. If it sa…

Not a bad legacy for Robert Habeck (along with the wind reforms), the leader we needed but didn't deserve [1][2]. Interestingly he's recently dropped out of politics and taken a teaching role at UC Berkeley.

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxwVR5JF8Ok

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxnnVPO9GFU

Re: Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels

#272
post #165
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What does your vision of perfect solar power look like? And within that vision, is a free person still able to decide for themselves if they want to buy a solar panel to hang on their balcony?

I think you're misunderstanding plantain's point. Where I live, in Argentina, every house has a water tank on the roof, which is filled from the water main through a float valve, like a toilet tank. Many houses need a pump to drive the water up to the water tank because the water main has such low pressure. This is somewhat expensive, and the pumps, float valves, and water tanks fail sometimes, which is inconvenient.…

You understood my point better than myself.

Re: Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t understand this sentiment at all. They didn’t sacrifice their balcony, and this is electricity that the central utility organizations couldn’t generate. Many parts of the world don’t even allow this kind of solar panel to be used by individuals, so its legality is actually a policy success. Generally, balcony panels are hung off the side of the railing, so no space was lost. If this was blocking out windows o…

> I don’t understand this sentiment at all. They didn’t sacrifice their balcony, and this is electricity that the central utility organizations couldn’t generate. Many parts of the world don’t even allow this kind of solar panel to be used by individuals, so its legality is actually a policy success. Completely disagree. This is definitely electricity that central utility organizations could generate. A central metho…

I've never been in a house that isn't a single point of failure for its own electricity. Possibly you didn't think this point through when you wrote it.

Re: Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels

#274
post #267

Possibly one of the worst possible investment choices From a collective point of view when it comes to electricity. One has to question how this choice came to make sense to the german public.

It costs the state nothing to remove regulations preventing the installations and people who buy one see ROI of 15-20%. It also helps the grid by moving production closer to consumption.

Re: Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels

#275
post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It happens already. Lease for green land (probably wrong terminus) and arable land went up by more than 30% in ten years [1]. PV is arguably a very small factor of influence yet. But the pressure is real. [1] https://www.bmel-statistik.de/landwirtschaft/landwirtschaftl...

That page doesn't say anything about PV. https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/en/documents/p... says that 17 million hectares are used for agriculture in Germany, 48000 hectares are used for golf courses, and (as of 02021) 32000 hectares were used for photovoltaics, which would be 0.2% of the agricultural area. I'm having a hard time finding current figures, but I doubt photovoltaics are more than 2% of the…

Thanks for looking up the numbers, and it wasn’t my intention to exaggerate the influence of PV. I just wanted to point out there is a lot of pressure and it may be a sensible policy to use up rooftops first instead of arable land (even though the influence of PV on land lease rates might be negligible today).

Re: Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels

#276

This is such a total failure of state capacity. Why can the government or industry not build solar power at an industrial scale, and then bring it to people's homes via the existing infrastructure at a price that makes this kind of micro-scale setup completely uneconomical? It's bad enough when we have to put solar panels on actual roofs to reduce electricity bills. This is just absurd. Where are the economies of sca…

The cost of solar power is close to independent of scale, so the benefit of doing those industrial scale plants is often smaller than the one for repurposing some bit of underused land. There's nothing absurd about it.

It's 10x more expensive. https://www.investigativeeconomics.org/p/solar-is-only-cheap...

Re: Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels

#277
post #247

> Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels A more fitting title would be "Germany's citizens outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels". The current phrasing makes it sound like it's somehow a thing done by the government, which is not the case. If anything the government is one of the many forces slowing down this progress. And yes, I am aware of things like grid security and stability…

Nitpick: Not every house owner is a citizen though.

There's nits on your nits: most residents (citizen or otherwise) don't own their properties; and while these things do work with houses, they are intended for apartments.

Re: Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels

#278

> German regulations limit balcony solar systems to 800 watts, enough to power a small fridge or charge a laptop. That gotta be a big laptop!

Only if you have batteries in between because the sun isn’t shining 24/7 in Germany (and elsewhere). The costs for batteries are as nearly always out of the debate when news papers/portals are glorifying this German balcony subsidy scheme (costs for the public due to power feed-in which isn’t mentioned at all in this article). In the grist article the battery issue is mentioned only in one sentence. The power feed-in is from the perspective of the power grid operator company sometimes called as power backfeed secretly which needs extra infrastructure.

Re: Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels

#279
post #269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly, like growing potatoes made economic sense to my parents' generation. Economic sense is largely defined by the economic policy set by the government. No one puts balcony solar in France, somehow their economic sense is different.

France has changed permitting laws to allow small-scale solar, i.e.: balcony solar, the difference is that the nominal output is much lower (350W vs 800W for Germany) which, by policy, makes it less attractive. So it isn't that France economic policies have made installing balcony solar unattractive, it's the permitting policies which are blocking people from installing more. You have it inverted, pun intended.

Germany could allow 2000W, or 4000W, instead of only 800W, but you seem to be missing Alexey's point.

Germany has very high electricity prices, even higher than the US (see https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/cost-of-e...), and this is due to policy failures in Germany. That's what makes these balcony systems so appealing.

I'm not sure that the outcome of having a lot of decentralized solar generation is a bad outcome.

Re: Germany outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels

#280
post #267

Possibly one of the worst possible investment choices From a collective point of view when it comes to electricity. One has to question how this choice came to make sense to the german public.

> One has to question how this choice came to make sense to the german public.

Easy: The most expensive energy prices in the world.

The infrastructure investments needed to handle renewables are massive and are effectively passed down the consumer, who to be fair is ideologically on board with this.

thus the downvotes on your post (predictably since Berlin timezone coming live) and this balcony thingy as a crumbs-off-the-table for the non-roof-havers

Post reply on HN