Live data from Hacker News

My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]

twitter.com

271–280 of 536 posts

Re: My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]

#271

An app which is build for cheating complains about cheating ...

Would you have the same sentiment for VPN (software built for cheating region locks) or ad blockers (software built for cheating content providers)?

Re: My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]

#272
post #263

Is it me, or "founders" are actually FREAKING dumb? Why people continue to give them money, and praise their "work"? Instead of making (indirect) ads for them we should publish their name and the company's name into shame publicly, and let their reputation die slowly... I have no respect for them, and you should not too (if you care about justice).

Most of the time ROI is still bigger. You would think that some ”evil”companies would be dead but stock price just keeps increasing. Imagine what Facebook would be if they had good morals?

Unfortunately you're right... Microsoft's stocks hit big again despite its evil background.

It is depressing to be a software developer now. Especially if you have a good heart.

I really hope the founder to have his career f**ed now, and other "founders (of nothing)" as well.

Re: My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]

#274

Hi everyone, this is Daniel from the Pickle team. Glass is a new open source project from us that we plan to build on and improve. We built several original features for it like live summaries, real-time STT Transcript and one-click "Ask" from summary that we're very excited about. However in initially building it we included code from a GPL-licensed project that we incorrectly attributed as Apache. This was incorrec…

If you had any semblance of respect for the work of others and what is right you would sincerely apologize and shut the project down instead of rolling with it.

Or how about an apology to handle it better with the company moving forward, and engage communication with the repo creator to involve him.

Really it's more of the gesture, to set the example, since we've all seen this before, and AFAIK, there haven't been too many amicable outcomes.

Re: My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]

#275

One starts to wonder whether the LLM vendors laissez-faire approach to the legality of ingesting copyrighted / licensed material will start to infect the industry in general?

I have yet to hear a convincing case for why what the LLM vendors did/do is different than what humans do to learn and become proficient in producing their own work.

Do you owe everyone you have ever read a royalty for influencing your writing style or voice? How about for all the other things you have leaned and become competent in?

There is a bigger issue here that is related to what humanity actually is and how we have been abused for many decades and several generations now, to the point that the abused generations have become the abusers of future generations simply because they are mentally trapped, addicted even.

A good uncontroversial example of this may be the excessive and deficit spending of governments, all based on what otherwise would be considered loan fraud, which is called national debt. It is used to keep perpetuating this system we call an economy because it has been so “successful” over ~100 years of “line go up”, solely because everyone wants the gravy train of reckless good times to continue forever.

Unfortunately for some generation of the future (maybe even our own), it simply cannot go on forever, so it won’t, because it is by definition unsustainable. But the goods times and “success” everyone sees everyone else having, keeps people from stopping the insane and utterly suicidal process of not only consistent, but accelerating addiction to every greater deficit and debt loan frauds called the national debt. It isn’t “Trumps fault” it “Biden’s fault”, or any other totem that can excuse or own actions. These are forces we don’t even understand any more than we are blindly changing at breakneck speeds. And if anyone tells you they understand these forces they are simply lying, when we cannot even understand the most basic concept of the fact that there is no alternative to this planet… as we destroy its ecosystem that produced us at ever accelerating speeds, in millions of different ways.

It’s quite similar if not the same as any other process we call addiction; we know it will cause ruin, yet we cannot extract ourselves from the endorphins, so we just keep lying to ourselves.

Re: My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]

#276
post #243

We are in a crisis of morals. There has always been trashy people but since 2020 it feels like a lack of morals is rewarded more than ever.

The highest jobs require these days a proven track-record of corruption. You can‘t blame young startups wanting to take the first step on that ladder. At the end of the day we are living in a merdeitocracy.

Re: My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]

#277
post #241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> Playing with daddy's money Personal attacks like this are not ok. Sure, criticize their actions, but don't parlay that into this kind of personal swipe at the individuals and their families; that's when the line is crossed from valid critique of actions to nasty mob pile-on, and that's never ok here. Not that it should matter but as far as I can tell, the Pickle founder/CEO grew up and studied in Korea, and we have…

[dead]

Re: My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]

#278
post #220

To a casual outside observer the quality of the companies YC invests in seems to have absolutely cratered. Have they just given up on vetting and switched to a throw money at everything approach?

My feeling is that they are investing in founders who they find impressive who are working in AI. Not so much in the uniqueness of their ideas.

YC invests in founders that have more odds to make it through a series A. Everything else is secondary.

Re: My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]

#279
post #220

To a casual outside observer the quality of the companies YC invests in seems to have absolutely cratered. Have they just given up on vetting and switched to a throw money at everything approach?

> Have they just given up on vetting and switched to a throw money at everything approach?

this is exactly their business model. almost word for word.

Re: My open source project was relicensed by a YC company [license updated]

#280

One starts to wonder whether the LLM vendors laissez-faire approach to the legality of ingesting copyrighted / licensed material will start to infect the industry in general?

I, for one, deserted GitHub, and do not use for anything else personal anymore. I'm not against permissive licensing, but all my code will be (A)GPLv3 or later. A particular project I'm working on will be on a private Git server until I complete and open it as a package. Even after that, I might keep the development closed and release tarballs only (aka Catherdral Model). All code I write is also AI-Free. It won't be…

if you ever used github for anything other than agpl3 you're doing it wrong
Post reply on HN