The NSF budget is ~$10billion. That's about half of NASA's, 1.2% of the DoD's, 0.5% of the discretionary budget ($1.7 trillion). Why is this the focus of the admin? Science is one of the few things the US is doing well.
[flagged]
NSF faces shake-up as officials abolish its 37 divisions
271–280 of 877 posts
Re: NSF faces shake-up as officials abolish its 37 divisions
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're going with the great conspiracy of GOP as Russian assets, you should also add Elon Musk and the other tech robber barons as Russian assets as well.
What is your explanation for Trump putting tariffs on every country in the world except Russia?
https://www.reuters.com/world/russia-cuba-north-korea-escape...
Re: NSF faces shake-up as officials abolish its 37 divisions
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
This is deeply detached from reality. I assure you, private R&D is voraciously reading published publicly funded papers. It's a significant PR issue that this misconception about how R&D works gets propagated ad nauseum.
I’ve seen “behind the curtain” in both private and publicly funded research. I can’t think of a single area where private industry isn’t standing on the shoulders of collective advancement. (I speak from experience as someone who holds a degree in one of the fields I’m about to mention.)
The biggest leaps tend to be made as a result of public-private partnerships. For example, essentially the totality of fundamental knowledge relating to aeronautics and aerospace, advanced medicine and life-saving pharmaceuticals (especially drugs for orphaned diseases), and any of the examples already offered in this thread.
Private ownership of scientific knowledge isn’t inherently a bad thing, but locking it up indirectly by virtue of eliminating all public funding for it does nothing more than to invite a new corporatist driven Dark Age.
Cyberpunk 2077 is a fun place to visit on the screen. I guess some people do want to live there.
Re: NSF faces shake-up as officials abolish its 37 divisions
#274Earlier quoted context omitted.
If that's how you're using it, then you're doing it wrong, because you're supposed to be supervising the drive the entire time. It's not self-driving if you're supervising. And you're required to supervise because... they're not confident it can actually self-drive.
where did i say i wasn't supervising? Are you saying the self-summon is the unsupervised part? Cause i can flip that logic on it's head and say, if they weren't confident that it can summon to me, why would they implement the feature?
Re: NSF faces shake-up as officials abolish its 37 divisions
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I mean, I guess we'll try to find competent and sane leaders again in 4 years. I don't know? There's not much else we can do at this point if this is the level of irrationality you're dealing with. There are absolutely not going to be free and fair elections 4 years from now. People really need to start preparing for this reality.
I still think it's possible we'll have free elections still, assuming the SAVE act fails. If it passes, as a democracy we're probably failed beyond repair in my lifetime.
Re: NSF faces shake-up as officials abolish its 37 divisions
#276Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
If you're going with the great conspiracy of GOP as Russian assets, you should also add Elon Musk and the other tech robber barons as Russian assets as well.
Re: NSF faces shake-up as officials abolish its 37 divisions
#277Re: NSF faces shake-up as officials abolish its 37 divisions
#278We absolutely cannot let science be hit by 50% budget cuts at NSF and NIH. It would be absolutely devastating to our standing in the world. Scientists will ABSOLUTELY leave to Europe and Canada to continue our research. I know that I would.
Concretely: at a European university, we are hearing from American researchers who would have been above our ability to attract previously, and who are directly telling us that they're interested in applying for positions because they have been directly affected by these funding cuts and antics. This could end up being an opportunity like the one the US had in the 1930s and 40s for any country able to take advantage…