Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Trump is a malicious actor. He literally tried to overthrow democracy on January 6! > Congratulations on empathizing with an authoritarian. It speaks to the strength of different agency administrators if they can walk into the next oval office, grab the duly elected President by the arm, and say "stop hitting yourself, stop hitting yourself" over and over again. Putting a stop to that wouldn't be so controversial,…
A lot of words to say absolutely nothing. Stop being so gullible.
Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry
271–280 of 280 posts
Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
A related change on the people's part has been decreased understanding of how to leverage their own political power. Congress-critters are concerned about losing reelection. (And of being primaried even in safe districts) Yet the minification of attention spans has confused the average American voter that they're impotent, when really they're just lazy, ignorant, and unwilling to muster real-world action. When's the…
> When's the last time you saw someone pepper a House district with self-made signs? Never, because it would be totally ineffective. Incumbents in Congress have about a 95% win rate[1]. For almost everywhere in the country, districts are what they are and no amount of hand drawn signs are going to change it. 1: https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2024:_Incumbent_wi...
Primaries are the place to beat candidates in most districts.
[0] https://ballotpedia.org/Primary_election_competitiveness_in_...
Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s interesting that you suppose my writing is AI generated? I’ve not seen AI that writes that way, but I suppose you might set it up to emulate a certain style. I’ve also been accused of using AI because I used an em dash. In that case, I guess it’s almost true, because my spell check would have put it there in place of space-dash-space. FWIW I am morally opposed to publishing AI slop where it might enter the publi…
> while I find my local models useful for organizing thoughts and prepping documents What did you train them on, just your own docs?
Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry
#274https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/addr... https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/04/fact-sheet-pr... >Krebs ... falsely and baselessly denied that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen This quote coming from "whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets" is pretty wild. This seems to be retribution, plain and simple.
From a regime that has a long history of lies, misdirection, and attempts to repress our basic freedoms as a nation and a people. This is why I write my Congress critters at least a month complaining. I know one letter only pushes the needle a tiny bit, but after a lot we'll eventually get them to realize that Congress is the real power and not the dime store dictator in the White House.
Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
> while I find my local models useful for organizing thoughts and prepping documents What did you train them on, just your own docs?
I typically just use agentic frameworks to make workflows using RAG. I have done some fine tuning and LORA tunes but I find that a good model with agentic prompting handles most things with a little tweaking. I’ve not done much recently as I’ve been working on hardware for a new project, but I’ve seen some really cool new frameworks out there with computer use, memory, agentic prompting, and some new forms of documen…
Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry
#276Earlier quoted context omitted.
I typically just use agentic frameworks to make workflows using RAG. I have done some fine tuning and LORA tunes but I find that a good model with agentic prompting handles most things with a little tweaking. I’ve not done much recently as I’ve been working on hardware for a new project, but I’ve seen some really cool new frameworks out there with computer use, memory, agentic prompting, and some new forms of documen…
As someone who hasn't done any local AI modeling but hopes to, could you clarify or explain your first sentence a little more? Happy to do my own research if you don't feel like teaching for free though - thanks for answering :)
That’s a tiny oversimplification, but basically that. You combine multiple agents with different “expertise” and give them access to a vectorised database of your information, or to tools that can ingest information for llm use, and you have a couple of half drunk interns that you can task with doing stuff for you.
It’s pretty cool, and sometimes also hilarious. I’ve had agents get quite testy with each other and even complain about their compatriots (they are all given names in the script). A little sexual harassment as well. (I often use uncensored models, I find that for critic / skeptic roles they are far superior).
Llms ape the best and the worst of humanity, but fortunately mostly the best parts.
Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry
#277[flagged]
That's not the fucking point! The dude is being retaliated against for doing his job and reporting facts that contradict an authoritarian conspiracy; regardless of your personal opinion of the man - this is, like so many other egregious abuses of power this admin has done, an illegal and flagrant abuse of power.
Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
As someone who hasn't done any local AI modeling but hopes to, could you clarify or explain your first sentence a little more? Happy to do my own research if you don't feel like teaching for free though - thanks for answering :)
Agentic workflows are where a script is used to provide guidance to the llm on the character it is playing, and therefore the context in which the interaction exists. It’s like a system prompt that changes with the application, like for example you might write a script where one agent is told that it is a phd level research assistant at MIT, The next agent is the head of the department , a critical research reviewer,…
Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry
#279Earlier quoted context omitted.
Look, I don't like waiting at the DMV either but doing it for a few hours every four to eight years is part of life. I don't believe anyone with a job is actually disenfranchised by this requirement. If they won't do that, then they won't register to vote either. In many cases, you can simultaneously get ID and register to vote too. By the way you can't get a job legally without providing ID, unless you are working g…
> don't believe anyone with a job is actually disenfranchised by this requirement. You are betraying your own ignorance. You clearly have never associated with people from a ghetto if you are saying that. > If you can't manage such a basic task, then you can't run your own life and have no business having a say in how other people live or die. There's probably some merit to that but I think it would really depend on…
Not everyone gets PTO. People from the ghetto, as you say, work part-time and can simply reschedule their work in most cases or go during off time. They are not working every single weekday during business hours, in general. Have you ever worked in the retail or restaurant industry, or done gig work? Nobody is booked solid like this. Besides, even the ghetto people need ID to buy alcohol and cigarettes, and to cash welfare checks.
Not to be a jerk, but there is a good reason for very poor people to have less say in how the country is run. You don't get poor by being super productive or owning a stake in the country. Poor people could be seen as not having skin in the game. The relationship between contributions and wealth is loose, as is the relationship between contributions and merit. But let's just say that people who have nothing to lose, and who probably hate the most productive members of society out of envy, and who may have severe character flaws or mental issues holding them back, probably are not on the same level as the best among us. We have decided to run our country in an egalitarian way that ignores these differences in general, but when we look at extremes I think the outliers are still jarring to most people. There are many people who fail at every aspect of life and envy others, who can vote to make others miserable too.
>Oh and the kicker? It's a poor filter anyway, at least for the purpose that you stated. Someone who doesn't work will have little issue passing it since he has no scheduling conflict with office hours and what's a multi-hour trip on public transit to him?
For an important appointment once every four to ten years, you can get a friend to drop you off or else take Uber. Don't give me this shit about being unable to get to the DMV. I've lived in red states and the DMV offices are perhaps 10 or 20 miles apart. In the worst case, you live way out in the country. I want you to start talking to people to see who doesn't have an ID. I'm sure you'll find that everyone with a regular job has one. Everyone who serves you or interacts with you in everyday life, besides some illegal immigrants, will have one. Basically everyone except children and the very elderly or disabled will have one. It is easy and cheap to get, and essential, so anyone who is not a complete hermit or headcase is going to have one.
Re: Deafening Silence from the Cybersecurity Industry
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
> don't believe anyone with a job is actually disenfranchised by this requirement. You are betraying your own ignorance. You clearly have never associated with people from a ghetto if you are saying that. > If you can't manage such a basic task, then you can't run your own life and have no business having a say in how other people live or die. There's probably some merit to that but I think it would really depend on…
>There's probably some merit to that but I think it would really depend on why. If you can't in the sense that you just don't follow through that's one thing. Whereas working the same hours that the ID office is open, not having PTO, being unable to afford taking unpaid time off, not being able to afford a personal vehicle; if you can't simply because you are poor that hardly seems a reasonable basis to disenfranchis…
There's also good reasons why you don't want to discriminate based on wealth.