Earlier quoted context omitted.
Solar and wind energy are impossible without stable energy sources like coal or fission. Solar and wind energy are highly volatile, and battery energy storage is far too expensive.
You already said that, and you're ignoring the fact that many countries are switching from coal and nuclear to renewables, thanks in part to the rapidly falling prices.
Will we ever get fusion power?
271–280 of 309 posts
Re: Will we ever get fusion power?
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
You already said that, and you're ignoring the fact that many countries are switching from coal and nuclear to renewables, thanks in part to the rapidly falling prices.
just today, the UK had its last coal delivery to a power plant. after that, it's closing and the UK will no longer be using coal at all. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckkg0wl7dkro
Re: Will we ever get fusion power?
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
Neither semiconductors nor plastics shift the energy generation paradigm. "Advanced materials"- alright, well, which ones? And do they give us a better return than good old steam? Wind, solar and batteries are products of combustion-fueled industry. The extent to which we have electrified the world industrial base is minimal, and to do so at the current scale on the basis of wind and solar would take a larger quantit…
You really believe it would have been possible to construct a modern wind turbine with the materials available in 1950? Yes they do give a much better return than any thermal source according to any recent study of LCOE I've come across. Reflected in investment numbers - renewables account for 70% of new global capacity added last year. Wind, solar and batteries are products of an energy intensive process NOT a combu…
Sure, modern materials make for a more modern wind turbine. But they don't shift the paradigm. Nothing has since fission, right?
> Wind, solar and batteries are products of an energy intensive process NOT a combustion based process.
The fact remains that energy intensive industry is currently accomplished mainly via combustion. The degree of electrification is small and an effort to fully electrify faces what appear to be prohibitive resource limitations. If you have any ideas on this point I would be interested to hear them.
Electrification is happening in personal transport. We have made minimal progress towards an electric shipping fleet, electric air travel, electric trucking, etc. And if we do begin to make serious progress, it will come with serious environmental (and likely political) costs.
Oak Ridge was a testbed. The Chinese have an MSR that has been selling power to the grid for several years. Copenhagen Atomics is building them to fit into shipping containers. Is this not enough to prove the technology viable? The main reason traditional fission became dominant, as I understand, is that it allowed nuclear-capable nations to conceal nuclear weapons programs with energy programs. And once the supply chain and institutional expertise gets some inertia, it is hard to change tracks.
Re: Will we ever get fusion power?
#274Earlier quoted context omitted.
Schockley-Quiesser limit
That's certainly a hard limit for a cell with a single P-N junction. However, with a bit of ingenuity, we can do much better than that; see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shockley%E2%80%93Queisser_limi...
Re: Will we ever get fusion power?
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
Schockley-Quiesser limit
Only applies to single-junction cells. 68%-efficient solar panels are quite theoretically possible, they'll just be incredibly difficult to manufacture cheaply. The current world record for solar panel efficiency is 47.6%.
Indeed even theoretically we can do 86% multi and 99% with quantum dots——in the current state of technology these remain science fiction considering the commercial manufacturing processes available.
Re: Will we ever get fusion power?
#276Earlier quoted context omitted.
You really believe it would have been possible to construct a modern wind turbine with the materials available in 1950? Yes they do give a much better return than any thermal source according to any recent study of LCOE I've come across. Reflected in investment numbers - renewables account for 70% of new global capacity added last year. Wind, solar and batteries are products of an energy intensive process NOT a combu…
> You really believe it would have been possible to construct a modern wind turbine with the materials available in 1950? Sure, modern materials make for a more modern wind turbine. But they don't shift the paradigm. Nothing has since fission, right? > Wind, solar and batteries are products of an energy intensive process NOT a combustion based process. The fact remains that energy intensive industry is currently acco…
But the most obvious difference, and that which contributes most to the paradigm shift, is the difference in price.
The existence of technology alone isn't enough to shift any paradigm - the tech has to be relatively cheap - transistors were a curiosity until they became cheap and then they shifted the paradigm, same thing happened with integrated circuits and nearly every technology breakthrough in history.
Batteries, PV and wind turbines are mass-produced and their prices are falling as you'd expect given the expansion in production (between 80% and 95% in the last 15 years). This has been the way since Henry Ford and is not going to change. What is also inevitable is that once mass-production is introduced into any human endeavour, then the existing technology is doomed.
The TMSR-LF1 in China has not being selling into the grid for several years. It was never envisaged to do so - it's absolutely tiny (only 2MW) and it's intended that it will operate intermittently for the first 5 or more years before they try running it continuously. This is a science experiment, not a viable commercial reactor. The 2nd Oak Ridge reactor back in the 1960s was 7 or 8 times bigger - although it never managed to run properly and only ever achieved 7MW of output.
I really don't understand why thorium liquid salt reactor enthusiasm is widespread. It's just one of endless reactor designs which failed to make it into commercial operation because of a host of genuine technical/engineering reasons. Just read the wikipedia page[1] - the list of disadvantages is longer than the list of advantages. For every problem it solves, it introduces several more.
Re: Will we ever get fusion power?
#277Earlier quoted context omitted.
just today, the UK had its last coal delivery to a power plant. after that, it's closing and the UK will no longer be using coal at all. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckkg0wl7dkro
This is irrelevant to what we were discussing originally. Neither the UK nor any other country does have battery storage of the size of major power plants. Those are required to provide stable energy. Otherwise the power would go out during calm or in the night.
It will take some time, you can't build this level of infrastructure overnight.
Here's another from today: https://driveteslacanada.ca/news/contact-energy-picks-tesla-...
Re: Will we ever get fusion power?
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Base load" doesn't really enter into it: you just need storage to make renewables make sense by supplying when generation doesn't meet demand and recharging when demand is less than supply. (or, if you have a cheap "base load" you use storage to even out the peaks and troughs in the same way). Base load is just a somewhat arbitrary line drawn across the lowest point of demand, it's not an actual requirement of the g…
There will be times when the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine. Storage can come to the rescue if this is a few hours, but over much longer time periods will be a problem. It's rare, but not unheard of. Gas will be part of the solution for many years to come.
Re: Will we ever get fusion power?
#279Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is irrelevant to what we were discussing originally. Neither the UK nor any other country does have battery storage of the size of major power plants. Those are required to provide stable energy. Otherwise the power would go out during calm or in the night.
As I've shown, many countries are making the change. It will take some time, you can't build this level of infrastructure overnight. Here's another from today: https://driveteslacanada.ca/news/contact-energy-picks-tesla-...
Re: Will we ever get fusion power?
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
As I've shown, many countries are making the change. It will take some time, you can't build this level of infrastructure overnight. Here's another from today: https://driveteslacanada.ca/news/contact-energy-picks-tesla-...
You haven't shown that "many countries" are building large-scale battery grid storage.
Where do you think that is being deployed?