Live data from Hacker News

Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

electrek.co

271–280 of 504 posts

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#271

Older Tesla cars have a 12V battery for accessories, until the main high-voltage battery is turned on. So does this mean having a 48V accessory battery? Or what?

Yes. Keeping the high voltage battery active is expensive, and also poses a (small) safety risk when the car is sitting.

It's probably a modified version of the '16V' lithium battery in all other Teslas, just with 3x the pack voltage.

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#272

Many comments here seem to be confusing the accessories circuit voltage with the electrical vehicle motor and drive system. The vehicle motors have a combined power output of 450KW which requires a high voltage 800V system or the wiring would be so heavy it would not be feasible. This spec appears to be the accessories circuit with Tesla pushing for a new 48V standard. That’s super smart because it immediately means…

48V has been considered for automotive for decades. The problem was not know how.

It simply has never been worth it before to retool things in practice.

It's also electrically a lot more noisy. The limit of what is considered low volt is like 60v or something.

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#273
post #269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>and the jumper pins It can be started through the converter? That takes something like a hundred amps. It must be pretty beefy.

No. For safety, hybrids and electric vehicles physically disconnect the high-voltage battery from everything when it's off with massive relays. So you can end up in the somewhat stupid situation where your high-voltage battery is fully charged, but you can't do anything because the tiny 12v motorcycle battery is flat. Starting simply requires enough 12v current to close a relay, the amps going though the "jumper pins…

[deleted]

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#274
post #223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This is an older article but explains it well https://www.greencarcongress.com/2017/06/20170602-audi.html From the article: > The 12-volt system is connected to the main electrical system via a DC/DC converter > Audi also offers the new MHEV technology with the conventional 12-volt electrical system > 48-volt vehicle electrical system. In a different layout—without MHEV—the 48-volt constant voltage system already e…

Realistically, using 12 volt and 48 volt for accessory systems are pretty similar. 48 volts just reduces your current, and you have to design everything for ~56 volts instead of ~14. But it's not really a different exercise.

> 48 volts just reduces your current

"Just" is doing an awful lot of work in that sentence.

Yes, moving from 12v to 48v reduces the current. That means you can have much smaller gauge wires, it means you lose a lot less power ( powerloss = (II)R ), it means you use a lot less copper and it means you save a lot of weight on wiring and connectors.

That is literally the point.

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#275
post #269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>and the jumper pins It can be started through the converter? That takes something like a hundred amps. It must be pretty beefy.

No. For safety, hybrids and electric vehicles physically disconnect the high-voltage battery from everything when it's off with massive relays. So you can end up in the somewhat stupid situation where your high-voltage battery is fully charged, but you can't do anything because the tiny 12v motorcycle battery is flat. Starting simply requires enough 12v current to close a relay, the amps going though the "jumper pins…

That describes the situation where the 12V battery is flat but the HV battery is charged. But what happens if the HV battery is flat on a non-plug in hybrid? Can it be charged from 12V?

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#276
post #39

I liked the interview with auto engineer Sandy Munro discussing the change https://youtu.be/ADwGGEj8sqQ?si=qp6akvy1yyWPTYNe - moving the voltage up means you can drop current - increase the data rate by using ethernet and PoE - using ethernet and PoE means you don’t have to run one off wires to each device, they can share a bus which results in half the copper being used in a lower voltage car - moving the voltage up…

> using ethernet and PoE means you don’t have to run one off wires to each device, they can share a bus which results in half the copper being used in a lower voltage car You mean like CAN bus is being used since 1990s? I think that Mr Munro little bit fell asleep and missed whole CAN bus and FlexRay evolution in cars.

CAN bus is still really slow (1Mbps, so bus contention is a problem). Sensors, cameras, AV stuff, etc. can't all live on the CAN bus. Cars are not the same things they were in the 90s.

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Smaller transformers with whole numbers, right? But why 4 and not 3 or 6?

We seem to stick with 7-smooth numbers, and really extra prefer highly composite numbers ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highly_composite_number ) for things we chose before the age of calculators. 3 and 6 were the standard voltages for consumer stuff back in the days of people needing to buy multiple packs of AA cells every year

Are we not all still buying multiple packs of AA batteries every year? Or maybe it's just those with kids.

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#278

Many comments here seem to be confusing the accessories circuit voltage with the electrical vehicle motor and drive system. The vehicle motors have a combined power output of 450KW which requires a high voltage 800V system or the wiring would be so heavy it would not be feasible. This spec appears to be the accessories circuit with Tesla pushing for a new 48V standard. That’s super smart because it immediately means…

48V has been considered for automotive for decades. The problem was not know how. It simply has never been worth it before to retool things in practice. It's also electrically a lot more noisy. The limit of what is considered low volt is like 60v or something.

Why is it inherently noisier?

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#279

Many comments here seem to be confusing the accessories circuit voltage with the electrical vehicle motor and drive system. The vehicle motors have a combined power output of 450KW which requires a high voltage 800V system or the wiring would be so heavy it would not be feasible. This spec appears to be the accessories circuit with Tesla pushing for a new 48V standard. That’s super smart because it immediately means…

48V is also used on some boats (eg. certain trolling motors)

Re: Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers

#280
post #278

Earlier quoted context omitted.

48V has been considered for automotive for decades. The problem was not know how. It simply has never been worth it before to retool things in practice. It's also electrically a lot more noisy. The limit of what is considered low volt is like 60v or something.

Why is it inherently noisier?

Faster slew rate for all switch supplies in the system. Nothing directly runs 48v.
Post reply on HN