Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like it will never be weaponized? If not by the US, by nobody else on earth?
Developing more advanced weapons have, in general, caused less violent wars. The main consequence of nuclear weapons was the lack of all-out hot conflict between world's two superpowers. If you want things to be lit and humanity to live safer lives, you should pray for development of better, deadlier weapons. I understand why most people don't understand this. But I just hope that an average HN reader has a better gr…
Game theory but where the wooden pawn now starts to be a little more than a wooden pawn and in fact a little more than a classic AI. It’s not the same rules as any classic literature in Game Theory.
I do agree with the weapon up until the atomic bomb. Game Theory, stats, probability, and psychology also tells us that sooner or later you maybe have a big enough weapon and someone may press the button.