uBlock Origin 1.53
271–280 of 293 posts
Re: uBlock Origin 1.53
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
We do not negotiate with terrorists
I would think posters on HN would understand that a service costs money. Any time I can pay with money instead of with my sanity, I choose money.
Ahh, but that's just it.
Youtube Premium isn't a service, it's a package.
If I could pay for Youtube by itself I would, but I can't, so I shan't.
Re: uBlock Origin 1.53
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
And money. Metered connections do exist, and ads consume a lot of bandwidth which is not free.
The cognitive load is the worst part of ads for me. The amounts of ads that display an X to close the banner only for that X to be an actual link to another fkn ad or straight up opens a new tab. Not to mention the invisible divs spanning the entire page so wherever you click, it's gonna open a link which is most of time either porn, betting sites or aliexpress. This sh* should be illegal.
Re: uBlock Origin 1.53
#274If it's true that YT is actively trying to avoid ad blockers then I guess I may have been pushed down their priority list because I occasionally run a video or two while logged in on my phone via official app where ads actually run.
Re: uBlock Origin 1.53
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder what the CO2 emissions of all these ads are?
So many people so concerned about CO2 emissions from computing devices... all the way down to Microsoft setting the default timeout for Bluetooth on Windows 11 to ONE MINUTE. It took me 2 weeks of hair pulling and updating everything before I realized why my mouse and keyboard would stop working, because it NEVER occurred to me in my WILDEST dreams that an OS developer would be given the insane task of creating a tim…
I can hear the fans on my Windows machine spin up, and I know it's Windows Update time.
Re: uBlock Origin 1.53
#276gorhill should be given a Nobel Prize and a knighthood for contributions to humanity.
Yes and: apparently the moderators on reddit's r/ublock have been having rough time. At least one has quit and deleted their account because of abusive users. No good deed goes unpunished.
In general, I view Reddit as a complete cesspool; I'm not really sure what any sub there really needs to exist. Most OSS projects get along just fine without it (in fact, I've never heard of one that used it).
I mean, it sucks that abusive users are out there, but it is Reddit after all. For communications with users, I think the old-style method of having Bugzilla and requiring an account to file bugs is probably the best.
Re: uBlock Origin 1.53
#277Re: uBlock Origin 1.53
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
You have to include the fact that the very clear objective of advertising is to make you consume more. Thus producing more pollution than if there were no ads. So, even if advertising was technically neutral (which is clearly not the case), it would still be an ecological cataclysm. One would even argue that the whole climate emergency is created by our advertise/consume culture.
That, plus the industry exists to support a negative-sum game. Past some degree of market or channel or target saturation, the only thing your ad spend does is cancels out the ad spend of your competitors. That, and it fuels the growth of an industry that's happy to enjoy the infinite money printer.
Re: uBlock Origin 1.53
#279Re: uBlock Origin 1.53
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be fair Youtube has to make a profit somehow. Ad revenue, direct and/or through profile data collection is easy and effective but the worst businessmodel for human sanity. I like that they at least offer an alternative for the ad viewing part through Youtube premium. I don't know about the US as streaming services seem to have catalogues orders of magnitude more extensive than over here in Europe, but compared to…
YouTube premium pricing is ridiculous. $14 a month for android and $19 a month for iOS? Get out of here How much could they possibly make from ads in a given month off a single user. Best case scenario with a user that watches YouTube like 4 hours a day 6 days a week and clicks through once every week. $4? Probably not even that. And yet somehow YouTube premium needs to be almost $230 a year for apple users? I bet th…
I do not like Google's business model, nor their politics either. Thing is they do have a defacto monopoly on viable creator VoD. Yes, other services exist, but they are too fragmented to be viable.
So, do I perpetuate this situation by giving them sub money? Yes. But pragmatically I'm still not going to have my kids be subjected to ad barrages in the meantime, while rooting for true competition to emerge.