Live data from Hacker News

FDA Approves First Oral Treatment for Postpartum Depression

fda.gov

271–280 of 299 posts

Re: FDA Approves First Oral Treatment for Postpartum Depression

#271
post #252
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lots of people became parents suing pandemic lockdowns and didn’t really have a choice or say in surrounding support structures being available or possible.

Which is itself completely irrelevant because support structures or lack thereof don't have anything to do with PPD in any way. Plenty of people with amazing support in their family and community end up with crippling PPD. Plenty of people with zero support don't have the slightest bit of PPD. It's irrelevant.

How is it completely irrelevant? I think you might not know as much as what you're talking about. And/or be out of date. I'm normally don't reply to posts that contain petulant dismissal and minimization of others.

Knowing how there is a much larger silent group who is reading and might disagree with you, or how your words will actually do harm to deny a mother what she may be going through.

It's up to you, but I hope you read the below with an open mind and eyes.

Isolation in a pandemic CAN make PPD worse.

The rates of PPD during the pandemic WERE much higher, and from what the data is saying more intense.

Imagine: Becoming a mother alone in a hospital room, without a single woman figure in the family who exists and would have been present otherwise is very easily a magnifier and amplifier of any conditions. Some mothers had to enter the hospital for weeks before birth alone from complications.

No visitors allowed, or only one. No support people allowed. Hospitals also had shut down most of the pre-natal and ante-partum programs and check-ins with dieticians, other parents to be, etc.

It was pretty much solitary confinement, and dismissal of it for those parents who went through it is pretty surprising since you seem to be an authority on what does or doesn't make PPD symptoms or experiences worse. It just kind of shows how out of touch your position might actually be.

So, onto the logical proof of explaining something that will only exist once science has studied it for your logical brain.

1) "Pandemic isolation is leading to more postpartum depression, anxiety. Everything that we tell postpartum women to do, like connect to other people, get out of the house, establish a routine, they can’t do that.”

https://www.today.com/parents/covid-19-pandemic-leads-more-p...

2) "A third of new moms had postpartum depression during early COVID.

People who delivered babies during the pandemic also reported more distress and anxiety. ... One in three new people who had babies in the beginning of the pandemic experienced postpartum depression – potentially triple pre-pandemic levels – while one in five had major depressive symptoms, according to research led by the University of Michigan School of Nursing and Michigan Medicine."

https://www.michiganmedicine.org/health-lab/third-new-moms-h...

3) "New moms, experts worry about postpartum depression during COVID-19 as services cut back Many in-person services now being offered by phone, video or have been cancelled altogether"

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/postpartum-depression...

4) "Women who lack social support after the birth of a baby are more likely to develop postpartum depression."

https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10...

5) "We believe the present study to be the first to demonstrate that fewer supportive persons during pregnancy is a predictor for postpartum depression. This finding points to the benefits of early intervention to increase the number of support providers for pregnant women19."

I hope this helps with undertaking a search yourself to learn more about PPD.

As an aside, it's questionable if there's a reason you feel it's acceptable to harshly dismissing the words of strangers as harshly as you might with your own inner dialogue? The world's eyes and ears are not a toilet for you.

As for support structures having nothing to do with PPD, I can only speak to what I've witnessed and what the doctors in our lives have pointed out.

Since you weren't there, and it might not exist for you unless you can understand it, it's pretty easy to search for topics on the internet these days.

Re: FDA Approves First Oral Treatment for Postpartum Depression

#272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is too far a leap, that haven't said anything overtly homophobic. It's likely they aren't homophobic, who knows. When we make leaps like this we risk the conversation devolving into something where the germane criticisms are lost. It's a lot easier to critique their position and rhetoric than to interrogate the content of their soul, and they will always have the home court advantage there. I'm not the rhetoric…

You got it exactly right. Simply stating a fact is not an attack on anyone. In any scientific inquiry one needs to consider all the similarities and differences in the data. Most notably, if HIV is spread through sexual contact, why was it most prevalent in gay men of a particular lifestyle in a particular place? If it were straight white Amish people that it was attacking, I would say the same thing. Not that it mat…

> if HIV is spread through sexual contact, why was it most prevalent in gay men of a particular lifestyle in a particular place?

You've answered your own question. Because they were a community of people in sexual contact with each other, and/or sharing needles.

Please consider that, whether or you are homophobic, you are repeating homophobic talking points. The idea that HIV was caused by "lifestyle" rather than a virus was invented to discredit the idea that it was an epidemic requiring urgent medical intervention. It's rhetoric which was invented to frame a disease as a moral failing in order to deny or delay the development of lifesaving care to a population some would prefer to see suffer and die (as well as deny or delay interventions like educating people and distributing protection). This is "gay plague" stuff. Frankly, I can understand why the other commenter took the impression you are homophobic.

Sincere congratulations to your sister. I hope the wedding is lovely.

Re: FDA Approves First Oral Treatment for Postpartum Depression

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's insane to me that a group of educated and seemingly intelligent people seem to think they understand more about drug safety and prescribing than the FDA, researchers and physicians. This is reminiscent of the Texas district judge who decided to controversially overrule the FDA on a medication safety decision that recently made the news, not good company one wants to have and I'm hoping is coincidental than sugge…

Its easy to figure out. Religion causes it.

I no longer believe that's the root, or even the primary, cause.

I keep thinking about Michael Crichton. He transmorphed from reality-based to nutter. What happened? Religion wasn't a factor. So what radicalized him?

Historian Joanna Radin's theory, paraphrasing, is that Crichton's full faith and trust in The System was so completely shattered, by the Vietnam War and other outrages, that he completely flipped.

The Speculative Present - How Michael Crichton Colonized the Future of Science and Technology https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.1086/704047

The theme of the second season of Jill Lepore's The Last Archive podcast is about skepticism ("What fed Doubt?") S01E06 "It Came From Outer Space" includes the example of Crichton's radicalization.

https://www.thelastarchive.com/season-2-episodes

Lepore has completely opened up my mind about anti-science, conspiracy, and other social pathogens. Made me a bit more empathetic.

Highest recommendation.

Re: FDA Approves First Oral Treatment for Postpartum Depression

#274
post #260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Uh, if you're reading off table 1 at section 5.3, that's across all chronically-administered SSRIs -- not this drug in particular. Zurzuvae was evaluated in much smaller clinical trials of 347 women 18-44 and as far as I can tell, did not have any incidences of discontinuance due to suicidal ideation.

The suicide warning for AD is misleading. They don't _cause_ suicidal thoughts, but they can give you energy and the ability to function before they start lifting mood. So if you're already suicidal, you can regain the ability to act on it before you get relief

That's not what the label warnings say. You're specifically contradicting the label's clear language, and you're saying that the FDA and the drug manufacturer are not telling us the truth when they put that label on a drug.

QED.

Furthermore, subjects with suicidal ideations or attempts are disqualified from clinical trials. In practice, this also means that any subject with depression is disqualified and shall not participate in any clinical trial for "antidepressants".

How does it feel to know that a drug that's supposed to treat depression, and may cause suicidal ideations and attempts, was never tested on anyone who was depressed?

Re: FDA Approves First Oral Treatment for Postpartum Depression

#275

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> For 99.9999% of humanity's history, penicillin was "never needed" *pure penicillin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tocosh and they are not the only ones to do something like this. I wonder why the American natives got so much sicker from European diseases than the Europeans did from the local native disease. It's almost like cities are petri dishes.

Because the old world had plagues (diseases that spread fast and kill) and the new world did not. Plagues and pandemics are zoonotic, and the new world just didn't have any domesticable animals except llamas.

> the new world just didn't have any domesticable animals except llamas

Turkeys, llamas, ducks, mink, ostrich, etc.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_domesticated_animals

Anyway it sounds like you're referring to Francis Galton's old take on the topic which doesn't really hold up in many ways https://galton.org/essays/1860-1869/galton-1865-domesticatio...

You haven't convinced me that there were no domesticable animals in the new world, or that that was the major factor.

It also doesn't explain why new world people already had a need penicillin formulations (earlier comment).

But if you are right, it sounds like the trade-offs that come with domestication may not be worth it except as accidental biological warfare. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15539148/

Also, the rats that carried the black plague were not domesticable. Don't you think open sewers in the streets contributed to disease a bit..

Re: FDA Approves First Oral Treatment for Postpartum Depression

#276

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s darkly humorous. That a persons depression is the only thing stopping them from killing themselves. And to get to a better state they have to cross the stage where they are still depressed but have acquired a “can do” attitude. End of day I think scrambling the brain is almost always the wrong choice. That these things are so heavily prescribed and marketed - what does that say?

It says nothing. They don't "scramble" your brain, or artificially make you happy, or any of the other ignorant things people have said. You are exactly the same person on AD as you are off of them. This is like pretending that anyone who gets antibiotics is weak and if you just exercise, you can beat infected wounds. Before antibiotics, people just died from wounds. Before AD, people spent their whole lives trapped…

> You are exactly the same person on AD as you are off of them.

Psychotropic pharmaceutical drugs are mind-altering substances. They place people in an "altered state of consciousness". Does this sound familiar.

When my cousin was allegedly afflicted by "chronic major depression", and he was prescribed Prozac, his mother commented "it's like I have my Joey back!" because his mood had lifted and he was acting very differently, different from his behavior in the past year or so, perhaps more like he was as a small child. His Mom always referred to them as Happy Pills. This was the regime when she would remind him to take his dose in the morning. "Take your Happy Pills."

Of course this behavior was mostly because he had been seeing a therapist and was getting some positive attention and reassurance. The SSRI drug soon triggered progressively more intense outbursts of rage and irrational behavior, and it would not be discovered for 5 years that he actually had a more serious mental illness, and the diagnosis and administration of SSRIs had been hasty and improper, exacerbating his condition.

Re: FDA Approves First Oral Treatment for Postpartum Depression

#277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'll never understand why there's such a dominance of luddite thinking, bad takes and conspiracy theories on HN, when it comes to the topic of mental health I imagine there are many professional forums filled with people who know topic X inside out therefore assume they must also be an authority on unrelated topics Y and Z. But I also suspect there’s something about software engineering, perhaps the ability to succ…

It's insane to me that a group of educated and seemingly intelligent people seem to think they understand more about drug safety and prescribing than the FDA, researchers and physicians. This is reminiscent of the Texas district judge who decided to controversially overrule the FDA on a medication safety decision that recently made the news, not good company one wants to have and I'm hoping is coincidental than sugge…

>>>"It's insane to me that a group of educated and seemingly intelligent people seem to think they understand more about drug safety and prescribing than the FDA, researchers and physicians."

I'm currently on a psychiatrist prescribed drug which is illegal in Japan, which means I have to discontinue it before an upcoming trip. This is not a new drug, it's a generic.

So is it "insane that a group of educated and seemingly intelligent doctors" in the U.S. are prescribing this drug or "insane that a group of educated and seemingly intelligent doctors" at the Japanese equivilent to the FDA are not authorizing this drug?

I mean, it can't possibly be the case that neither group knows what it's doing, and that our scientific understanding of the brain is primitive, correct? One group has to be the insane one, right?

Re: FDA Approves First Oral Treatment for Postpartum Depression

#278
post #84

[flagged]

Care to share where that sentiment comes from? Also, a bit ironic considering the recent n of 1 trial they approved for DMD. Have you heard of the oncologist that did a murder suicide on her 4 month old baby in Westchester this weekend? Not every disease has the luxury of waiting around decades for safety and efficacy fact sheets.

I have nothing to say about this particular drug, but it's without a doubt that the FDA carries water for the pharma industry.

My own personal anecdote is that I've been taking NMN as a dirt-cheap supplement for years, until recently, when the FDA decided that one of their pay-pigs is going to turn it into a prescription drug, and likely charge much, much more for it:

https://healthnews.com/longevity/longevity-supplements/fda-b...

Re: FDA Approves First Oral Treatment for Postpartum Depression

#279

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The suicide warning for AD is misleading. They don't _cause_ suicidal thoughts, but they can give you energy and the ability to function before they start lifting mood. So if you're already suicidal, you can regain the ability to act on it before you get relief

That's not what the label warnings say. You're specifically contradicting the label's clear language, and you're saying that the FDA and the drug manufacturer are not telling us the truth when they put that label on a drug. QED. Furthermore, subjects with suicidal ideations or attempts are disqualified from clinical trials. In practice, this also means that any subject with depression is disqualified and shall not pa…

> That's not what the label warnings say. You're specifically contradicting the label's clear language, and you're saying that the FDA and the drug manufacturer are not telling us the truth when they put that label on a drug.

SSRIs and suicide risk remains controversial, habinero is describing one possible explanation and what I was taught in medical school over a decade ago. The label language is clear but you are failing to understand the complexity and rationale behind the warning and actual clinical implications. This is not unexpected as monographs are intended for a medical expert audience who are trained in their interpretation.

To keep it simple for everyone I suggest we defer to the Chair of the FDA proceedings that led to the boxed warning for his explanation as he is undoubtedly more of an expert than any of us on this matter (shortened for brevity):

It seems inconceivable that antidepressants would induce suicidality in the absence of other associated or antecedent behavioral changes. The essential message of the Black Box is to remind prescribers and consumers about the importance of monitoring closely for adverse behavioral changes during ... antidepressant therapy in order to reduce the risk of suicidality in patients through age 24 years. The intention was not to discourage appropriate prescribing of antidepressants for youth with depression, OCD or anxiety disorders.

In fact, some evidence .... suggested substantial reductions in antidepressant medication prescriptions in children and adolescents following the Black Box Warning ... For the majority of these patients, the benefits of antidepressants greatly outweigh the risks. Nevertheless, we agree ... that prescribers have a “duty to warn” and highlight the need for adequate training for all potential prescribers during medical school and residency programs.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.0036...

I will again note that for Zurzuvae the boxed warning was downgraded.

> Furthermore, subjects with suicidal ideations or attempts are disqualified from clinical trials.

https://www.nature.com/articles/npp2011247

https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.ajp.2...

I found these 2 pharmacotherapy RCTs on patients with suicidal ideation within 30 seconds of Googling.

> In practice, this also means that any subject with depression is disqualified and shall not participate in any clinical trial for "antidepressants".

> was never tested on anyone who was depressed?

How are you making this leap that none of the RCTs enrolled patients with depression? You do realize it's a minority that have suicidal ideation right?

Re: FDA Approves First Oral Treatment for Postpartum Depression

#280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's insane to me that a group of educated and seemingly intelligent people seem to think they understand more about drug safety and prescribing than the FDA, researchers and physicians. This is reminiscent of the Texas district judge who decided to controversially overrule the FDA on a medication safety decision that recently made the news, not good company one wants to have and I'm hoping is coincidental than sugge…

>>>"It's insane to me that a group of educated and seemingly intelligent people seem to think they understand more about drug safety and prescribing than the FDA, researchers and physicians." I'm currently on a psychiatrist prescribed drug which is illegal in Japan, which means I have to discontinue it before an upcoming trip. This is not a new drug, it's a generic. So is it "insane that a group of educated and seemi…

I think there’s a meaningful difference there. A disagreement between two highly qualified groups of doctors seems valid. A disagreement between a group of highly qualified doctors and someone who did some research on the internet does not.
Post reply on HN