I have had a lot of fun with Anglish in the past, composing poetry and even attempting to write school assignments in it. However as I've grown as a linguist, I now disagree with the direction that they've taken it, but I understand why. That is, the Anglish project uses cognates and sometimes inventions from Old English, Dutch and German because most linguists (and people) consider English a West Germanic language,…
Do you have any examples of an English / Scandinavian hybrid? Also, I wonder if such a thing might actually arise in the Scandinavian countries in the future?
What Is Anglish?
271–280 of 363 posts
Re: What Is Anglish?
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
If I steal your bicycle, but you still have it, then is it really stolen?
loan has the explicit give back property. thats what a loan IS: 'borrowed' carries the same implications with a down-note on the giving back. taken, adopted, brought in, co-opted... there's a thesaurus of choices which to my way of thinking do a better job of describing english's habit of .. adopting other languages words. the key point is that gate-keeping in english doesn't work. we don't have the academie francais…
Re: What Is Anglish?
#273Re: What Is Anglish?
#274Re: What Is Anglish?
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
Synoniemenbüch, probably?
Synonymwörterbuch, apparently: https://shop.duden.de/collections/worterbucher-und-sprache/p...
Re: What Is Anglish?
#276Earlier quoted context omitted.
In Dutch, as an example we have a word called zoetwater - which if you translate it literally, is "sweet water". But it is the word for 'freshwater' in English [as opposed to saltwater], not some kind of sweet water. Even though zoetwater could be literally translated, no one really knows it means freshwater in English. There is advertisement for 'fris water' or 'vers water', which means fresh water correctly.
Fresh, non-salt water used to be called sweet in English too, but that term has fallen out of use for some reason.
Re: What Is Anglish?
#277Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s interesting to me how comparatively impoverished Anglish seems. Here’s to promiscuity!
Opinion of a Polish guy: In my eyes, English is pretty bloated, when seemingly almost every concept can have three or more alternative words, each from a different source. It is all matter of perspective, I suppose. :) I think such feeling can be caused by languages that rely strongly on creating compound words rather than borrowing a new ones (example from the site: Dictionary > Wordbook).
Re: What Is Anglish?
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yorkshuhman here… we say “ta” (tak) for thanks. We also say “cheers” (tschuss) for goodbye. Going a bit deeper, “dale” (daal - Dutch), “beck” (beek - Dutch). Having learnt (not learned) in Amsterdam, it’s very, very like the dialects of the north east of Yorkshuh. So much so, it’s rather a surprise.
cheers means goodbye in Yorkshire? In Lancashire (and elsewhere in the UK) I’ve never heard it mean anything other than “thank you” or the thing you say after clinking glasses the only time I’ve ever heard anything different is from foreigners learning English
Re: What Is Anglish?
#279Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rome first, the descendants of Charlemagne second, and William the Conqueror. “English” didn’t have a chance.
I mean Rome came first everywhere, William the conqueror came from Norsemen, which means Normandy was where the Vikings settled there. Pretty much all of Europe has had this kind of multiple conquests different language groups percolating everywhere - but English is the one that chose this model of how to handle it.
Re: What Is Anglish?
#280It sounds almost like the handbook from Severance or something quasi-fanatical, fictional religious texts or such.