Live data from Hacker News

Israel Finds Fourth Covid Booster Is Ineffective

healthpolicy-watch.news

271–272 of 272 posts

Re: Israel Finds Fourth Covid Booster Is Ineffective

#271
post #216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. At the very worst the vaccine causes harm , and provides no benefit. > I don't want to go around checking if people had or did not have Covid, which a lot of people are prone to lying about. We're not talking about sterilizing immunity. Even the best case arguments for booster doses in the young are citing efficacy against "symptomatic illness" that is well below 100%. Case in point: I just had it. I'm triple vac…

> I'm triple vaccinated. Why?

It was a toss up. Some reasons why I went the way I did:

1) I am of an age where risk/reward ratio is clearer. It still isn't so compelling that I rushed to do it, but far better than for college kids.

2) I was (and remain) concerned that the dark-blue city where I live is going to mandate them to participate in normal life. I find this loathsome, but I am not in a position to fight it.

3) It gives me a certain authority when I tell people that I don't believe in vaccine mandates or many of our policies, yet I am 100% compliant with the rules.

4) I thought maybe it would keep me from catching a cold.

Alas, because the universe tends toward maximum irony, a week after the booster I caught Omicron.

Re: Israel Finds Fourth Covid Booster Is Ineffective

#272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"as many as someone will pay for" doesn't contradict "we don't have the capacity". This is a capital allocation problem and dedicating 100% of the world gdp to vaccine production will not improve our overall health and prosperity.

But no one was suggesting " dedicating 100% of the world gdp" to vaccine production. I'm simply saying that using more boosters in wealthy countries in no way depletes the vaccine, or raises the prices for it, in poorer countries. I mean, would you agree that wealthy people buying more television sets does not in any way reduce the ability of poorer people to buy television sets?

If rich people decide to throw away their TVs every six months and get a new one, this may affect our ability to make sure everyone in the world has a TV without beginning to sacrifice other things like bread or clothing.

But this analogy sucks because a TV is a luxury purchase and there's no network effect whereby I become safer if everyone in the world has a TV.

Post reply on HN