Thank you for all the hard work
It's weird that most of “Hacker” news is dominated by business news
271–280 of 295 posts
Re: It's weird that most of “Hacker” news is dominated by business news
#272Re: It's weird that most of “Hacker” news is dominated by business news
#273If you or anyone wants to see more posts of type X, the best thing to do is to find interesting links of type X and submit them.
Re: It's weird that most of “Hacker” news is dominated by business news
#274Re: It's weird that most of “Hacker” news is dominated by business news
#275Yes. Posts like "How to make $1 million with embarrassingly little work" are always going to make it to the HN frontpage. Which makes me wonder. Are we here to discuss technology? Or are we here to daydream how we get rich while sleeping? Also the "hackers" on HN are increasingly buying systems that are built to resist hacking and that have a target audience that can be described as "mom, dad and grandparents". Somet…
Re: It's weird that most of “Hacker” news is dominated by business news
#276Yes. Posts like "How to make $1 million with embarrassingly little work" are always going to make it to the HN frontpage. Which makes me wonder. Are we here to discuss technology? Or are we here to daydream how we get rich while sleeping? Also the "hackers" on HN are increasingly buying systems that are built to resist hacking and that have a target audience that can be described as "mom, dad and grandparents". Somet…
The other day I saw a post here asking people about how much they had saved and what their age was. A completely pointless dick-measuring thing, that I thought I wouldn’t find even in the likes of Reddit. I follow HN on and off, usually just lurking, since 2017. But lately I’ve noticed a surprising amount of people humble bragging about their crypto wallets, their no-work-million-dollars startup, and how good their l…
Re: It's weird that most of “Hacker” news is dominated by business news
#277Probably something to do with a lot of us becoming pawns in silicon valley's carefully orchestrated theater. Maybe combined with mass media grappling harder and harder for people's attention as their precious TV dies out. Looks like to be quite potent resulting in people posting a lot about politics and business.
If you or anyone finds other things more intellectually interesting, you're very welcome to post more of them, or look for them in /newest and upvote more of them.
Re: It's weird that most of “Hacker” news is dominated by business news
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree with your overall thrust, but I certainly wouldn't have picked those examples. The diet threads just make me roll my eyes and think "Californians will believe anything"! (Sorry California, I know you don't all fit the stereotype.)
Have you had avocado toast? It’ll rock your world, seriously.
Re: It's weird that most of “Hacker” news is dominated by business news
#279Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the elected officials & appointees actually cared for something like this, it would have existed already. Ultimately, the problem is that the "res publica" is not actually for the public. The whole premise that a single person can meaningfully "represent" millions is so laughable, I don't know why we keep pretending it's actually democratic.
Indeed, such an improvement would have to be insisted upon by the demos . But the res publica has NEVER been a democracy at any point. What we have is a gnarly attempt to scale from the individual to the group, the singular to the plural, the integer to the list(integer). Hence my comment: technically savvier people like those who visit this site badly need to give this res publica an enema.
Re: It's weird that most of “Hacker” news is dominated by business news
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the elected officials & appointees actually cared for something like this, it would have existed already. Ultimately, the problem is that the "res publica" is not actually for the public. The whole premise that a single person can meaningfully "represent" millions is so laughable, I don't know why we keep pretending it's actually democratic.
>The whole premise that a single person can meaningfully "represent" millions is so laughable, I don't know why we keep pretending it's actually democratic. What does "meaningfully" mean, in this context?
The problem is that, for this to be the case, constituents must have a working communication channel. But when you have a single representative ostensibly speaking for millions (or even tens of thousands) of people, any such channel is quickly overwhelmed, and becomes mostly a token thing.
Council democracy tries to solve it by ensuring that, at every level, each delegate speaks for a relatively small group of people - small enough that it can regularly assemble to keep the delegate under control at all times.