Live data from Hacker News

Few people know that Google voluntarily removes some search results

twitter.com

271–280 of 309 posts

Re: Few people know that Google voluntarily removes some search results

#271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here in NZ, a lot of work on your own property is legal - even some relatively complicated stuff - but the catch is that you need to find a qualified inspector to sign off on it. The reality is that unless someone knows you and your work personally (friend, relative, w/e) it can be really difficult to find an inspector who is willing to sign off on some random persons work as there is a liability component (nowhere n…

laws requiring a third party to sign off on things you can do to your own property sounds like a violation of freedoms

As a Kiwi I tend to see it more as common sense. What freedom does one have with half a house lying on top of them?

Re: Few people know that Google voluntarily removes some search results

#272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

laws requiring a third party to sign off on things you can do to your own property sounds like a violation of freedoms

What "freedoms"? That term is used everywhere and rarely defined well. The freedom to "do what you want with your own property"? That doesn't exist - anywhere! You need to follow the rules and the only way to make sure someone is doing things properly (or at least know how to) is either to have them be certified in what they do or have someone who is certified check their work. If you screw up your electrical wiring,…

So do you have any data to back this up?

Do home-owner repaired house catch on fire more often than houses repaired by licensed contractors?

My insurance company has never told me I can't repair my own house.

Easy to say things like this, but once you get out into the real world you notice a lot of America doesn't want to pay $150/hour to change a light switch...and has the knowledge to DIY it.

Re: Few people know that Google voluntarily removes some search results

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is just no way this is correct. First, most municipalities in America anyway allow a homeowner to do their own electrical work. You are required to get a permit for the work though and then have it inspected by the city inspector to verify the work was done correctly. But second and maybe more importantly how would you ever be able to get insurance on an older house. There may have been dozens of different elec…

> First, most municipalities in America anyway allow a homeowner to do their own electrical work. You are required to get a permit for the work though and then have it inspected by the city inspector to verify the work was done correctly They allow them to change sockets and light switches. Anything requiring a city inspector is literally the same thing as getting a licensed electrician. Municipalities have a lot mor…

I've read over my home-owners insurance policy very well. There are no provisions that say anything about "electrical work requiring a city permit shall be done by a licensed electrician".

Do you have any evidence to point to where someone changes a dishwasher or some other small electrical project, and later insurance denies a claim?

I can imagine scenarios of gross negligence (wires run all over exposed, gas leaks, etc. etc.), but if we are talking small mistakes by homeowner during a un-permitted DIY project, I have a very very hard time believing insurance is going to scour the rubble to investigate...like literally how to you prove that!?

Re: Few people know that Google voluntarily removes some search results

#274
I'm a dox victim and live in Europe. I've tried to use my right to be forgotten and used Google's removal request, to which the answer was:

"It is Google’s understanding that the information about you on this URL - with regard to all the circumstances of the case we are aware of - is still relevant in relation to the purposes of data processing, and therefore the reference to this document in our search results is justified by the public interest.

Based on the information available to us at this time, Google LLC has decided not to take action on this URL."

I've now tried the other URL, but I doubt this will help.

Re: Few people know that Google voluntarily removes some search results

#277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The prior owner of my house was very free with his exposed wire nuts and other sketchy wiring practices then. I’ll take some level of safety that my house won’t burn down or electrocute me over absolute freedom.

You should have a house inspected before you buy it. It's not necessary to monitor and restrict all owners to protect possible future buyers who don't want to inspect a house before buying it.

No inspector in the world is going to open up all of the electrical fixtures and look at the wiring inside.

Re: Few people know that Google voluntarily removes some search results

#278
post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this the same Eric Schmidt as in "If You Have Something You Don’t Want Anyone To Know, Maybe You Shouldn’t Be Doing It"? [0] https://www.huffpost.com/entry/google-ceo-on-privacy-if_n_38...

The context of that quote was him explaining that Google has to comply with legal government requests for information.

Which doesn't really change the meaning in any way.

Re: Few people know that Google voluntarily removes some search results

#279

I'd like to take this opportunity to share some relevant exercepts from In The Plex[^1] about Eric Schmidt, then-CEO of Google. > One day Denise Griffin got a call from Eric Schmidt’s assistant. “There’s this information about Eric in the indexes,” she told Griffin. “And we want it out.” In Griffin’s recollection, it dealt with donor information from a political campaign, exactly the type of public information that G…

Did they remove Schmidt's information?

Re: Few people know that Google voluntarily removes some search results

#280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> People often pay electricians even for tasks that are just "flip a switch and turn some screws," after all. The ultimate reason people pay electricians is liability. Unlicensed work is an easy way to invalidate your homeowner's insurance, lose everything, and get sued for any damage to your neighbors' property (by their insurance company, no less).

My view is that if the only reason you are doing something is because of the insurance implications, then you've surely made the wrong decision. Nobody's interests are less aligned with your own than an insurance company's. There are lots of legitimate reasons to hire an electrician, but making decisions solely based on what someone who wants you to perpetually give them money whole finding reasons to never give it b…

The other way to view that is that insurers have put more work into quantifying risk than anyone else has.
Post reply on HN