These two resonated with me: > A lot of intelligent observers look at cryptocurrency, see that it makes no sense, and reasonably infer that they must be missing something profound on the technical level. Tech culture has a nice tradition of not deriding new ideas, but we need to break it here and speak out > [non-tech people] don't see the huge silent majority of tech people who know it's a scam. That's on us It is o…
> I'm pretty sure it's nothing but a pyramid scheme, but I always gave the enthusiasts the benefit of the doubt. So go find out? I’m quoting you here for the “pretty sure” part. Do a deep dive. I’be done deep dives on Bitcoin, Ethereum, Cardano, Monero, Nano, Iota, Hyperledger, BSC, Uniswap, Tether, Chainlink and cursory glances at dozens of other coins/tokens. I’m a tech guy. I work on an operating system/embedded s…
It's time for us in the tech world to speak out about cryptocurrency
271–280 of 1001 posts
Re: It's time for us in the tech world to speak out about cryptocurrency
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why can't the tech be neat/super cool and primarily be used to run a scam? I mean bittorrent is neat tech as well but it's still primarily used for piracy. Doing a deep dive into how bittorrent works doesn't suddenly change the fact that 99.9% of torrents out there are violating somebody's intellectual property. All I'm saying is, there's lots of super neat tech out there that's primarily used for not-so-super-neat s…
I disagree with the characterization that the primary use is a scam. That’s like saying the primary use of email is to receive ads and phishing mail.
Re: It's time for us in the tech world to speak out about cryptocurrency
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm the author of the thread. For what it's worth, I grew up as a refugee whose mother had to find incredibly inventive ways to send USD to family back home, where it was illegal to possess. What I don't understand about the crypto remittances argument is how the people sending and receiving them are supposed to convert them into spendable currency. My hunch is that a lot of the value of cryptocurrency in those count…
> What I don't understand about the crypto remittances argument is how the people sending and receiving them are supposed to convert them into spendable currency. The final goal is not to be able to convert crypto to fiat, the goal is to keep everything in crypto. Do you think all this infrastructure is being build just to convert it back to fiat, what cypherpunks want is to destroy fiat.
Inevitably the answer is "some trusted third party" that turns it into a vanilla remittance.
Re: It's time for us in the tech world to speak out about cryptocurrency
#274Re: It's time for us in the tech world to speak out about cryptocurrency
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm the author of the thread. For what it's worth, I grew up as a refugee whose mother had to find incredibly inventive ways to send USD to family back home, where it was illegal to possess. What I don't understand about the crypto remittances argument is how the people sending and receiving them are supposed to convert them into spendable currency. My hunch is that a lot of the value of cryptocurrency in those count…
>> What I don't understand about the crypto remittances argument is how the people sending and receiving them are supposed to convert them into spendable currency. For all the harsh words you posted without evidence, thankfully you've at least admitted you don't understand much. Your premise is that cryptocurrency is not "spendable currency" which is simply false. I pay people in hyperinflationary environments in cry…
Re: It's time for us in the tech world to speak out about cryptocurrency
#276Earlier quoted context omitted.
Something being wrong with the economy doesn’t preclude Bitcoin from being a scam. That’s a false dilemma you’re proposing.
This, this is a scam: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M1SL Notice the 5x supply increase without a corresponding 5x in economic efficiency. Bitcoin is what it is. It's worth what people think it's worth. Just like gold. Gold has minimal practical use in real life but it was used as a type of money off and on for 5000 years.
Re: It's time for us in the tech world to speak out about cryptocurrency
#277Seems lobsided. Sure Bitcoin suffers from high fees, but it serves well as a savings account. We've also started accepting litecoin payments on our site: I set it up once, and forgot about it. With Paypal it's a never-ending rigamarole. I've recently closed my bank account, and started using something a bit more up-to-date (Revolut). I believe Bitcoin is the single biggest innovation driver in the tech sector right n…
> I believe Bitcoin is the single biggest innovation driver in the tech sector right now Not gonna lie, I laughed at this.
Re: It's time for us in the tech world to speak out about cryptocurrency
#278Re: It's time for us in the tech world to speak out about cryptocurrency
#279These two resonated with me: > A lot of intelligent observers look at cryptocurrency, see that it makes no sense, and reasonably infer that they must be missing something profound on the technical level. Tech culture has a nice tradition of not deriding new ideas, but we need to break it here and speak out > [non-tech people] don't see the huge silent majority of tech people who know it's a scam. That's on us It is o…
Crypto is so large, complex and fast-moving that it takes thousands of hours to grasp.
If I'd make a list of 100 questions regarding crypto, an exam so to speak, I am reasonably sure that this silent majority can't even answer 5% of the questions.
Because they don't know crypto. At all.
Re: It's time for us in the tech world to speak out about cryptocurrency
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your comment is unclear. > What is surprising is how large the number of techies who don’t get this. What do you mean by "this"? Do you mean all of the points made by the author in the tweets? Or do you mean "the following" instead of "this", referring to what you think is most innovative about Bitcoin?
If you don’t believe that there is value in a distributed self replicating Byzantine tolerant state machine, that’s fair, everybody is entitled to their opinion.
edit: why the flagging? do I seriously need to go get a PhD from MIT to understand this and why this is important?