Earlier quoted context omitted.
What 3 ETFs do you invest on?
SCHB, SCHF, and SCHE. That's a bit of an oversimplification because I do have some other assets I've picked up over the years. But the bulk of my net worth is invested in those 3. If I were to start over again I might even just hold SCHB, which I feel has enough international exposure to make SCHF and SCHE somewhat redundant, while also being more efficient for taxation purposes.
“Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
271–280 of 327 posts
Re: “Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
#272The sad thing is I think this is true except that far fewer active trades than hustles make a profit...
Re: “Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
#273Re: “Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
#274Article misses the point (perhaps due to their capital investments) that the resurgence in active trading is almost entirely just gambling, but exempted from casino regulation. Also, saying "no more" to refer to a blip fad is a ridiculous healdit.
except it isn't: if enough gamblers stick to one ticker, they can break the market. options aren't roulette and stocks aren't blackjack. casinos don't have this failure mode. gamestop was the example of what happens in the limit - only the DTCC prevented a global financial crisis as a circuit breaker of last resort.
Re: “Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
#275Frankly, I think passive investing has ruined the fundamentals of investing and in part responsible for the poor financial health of our economy. While the idea behind passive investing may seem like a good one, people often forget it's a double edge sword. By this I mean, when you invest into an ETF or index fund, that money in turn goes into everything underneath it. All too often that money isn't invested in the u…
Re: “Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
#276Re: “Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
#277Maybe a16z doesn't like it, but ,,buy and hold'' active investing works quite well. Passive investing means doing what your bank advisor suggests. People are starting to realize that those advisors may not make smarter decisions on where the world is going than the people themselves.
I don't understand how this view is still controversial. I worked in fund management: I have never seen people who were so overpaid (myself included) for doing so little. Fund managers are a net negative cost to the economy, and they earn fees to do it. Most of them, particularly personal advisors, understand nothing about investing that most people couldn't learn themselves (the only exception are the big wealth man…
Re: “Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
>the companies who use debt to buyback their shares are whats driving the market. Every dollar they spend on their stock is then magnified 100x by the big passive funds, and both 1 & 2 have no agency other than to try to get swept up in the winds. I've always found stock buybacks intriguing and confusing. Here's a hypothetical scenario that seems to go against what you're saying: Company A buys back $1 work of stock.…
market cap = book value + discounted future cash flows = share price * number of outstanding shares When you do a buyback, the book value drops (company loses cash), but the discounted future cash flows remains unchanged. The number of outstanding shares also drops. The net result is the stock price increases as a company accumulates cash and uses it for buybacks because the number of outstanding shares drops. Anothe…
Re: “Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
#279I am a hedge fund guy who invests his own $$$$ passively so make of this what you will. There will always be a mix of active and passive. Fundamentally - passive only works when it follows smart active. Actives do expensive research and trade against each other to arrive at the consensus price. Passives trade at that price for "free." Since both get the same price on average but passives incur no cost, they win on av…
Re: “Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
#280I am a hedge fund guy who invests his own $$$$ passively so make of this what you will. There will always be a mix of active and passive. Fundamentally - passive only works when it follows smart active. Actives do expensive research and trade against each other to arrive at the consensus price. Passives trade at that price for "free." Since both get the same price on average but passives incur no cost, they win on av…
So I've been trying to work this out. Previously I understood the idea "The passives are simply the average of the actives". So even if you had 99% passive, so long as the actives were doing their homework the system would work, but as you said you need to watch for exploits. But then I had the question: When the world has gone passive, who is left as an active investor? 1. Wallstreetbets users who do poorly on avera…