Wiki says Parler is a team of 30 people, So realistically, does that mean like 10 devs running a social network with 5-10 million users? I imagine its pretty ceazy there right now after getting booted off AWS, google just banned u off play store, so cant use them, i assume they cant use microsoft because theyll ban them there as well, it would be cool to see if they are able to get things up and running again. (Ive n…
I was thinking about it this morning. They probably didn't have an easy time finding new employees too because of the nature and controversy associated with the site, potentially part of the reason for lack of moderation. Not defending, just observing. It's interesting from a business/development perspective when it comes to rapid scale and team size.
70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
271–280 of 1001 posts
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#272This is a political purge.
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#273When you purposefully leak private data, you no longer get to hide behind the title "Security Researcher".
Parler was ground zero for the community that announced and executed the attack on the capitol. Thought leaders there were routinely evoking, imagining, and outright calling for violence, and the crowd was a feedback loop. Fundamentally the Parler community existed to provide a platform for people who had been already banned from Twitter. Frankly the peaceful use of the site was mostly incidental. I think there's a r…
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#274Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can't be serious. There were literally millions of users on the platform.
Per Wikipedia, the count of active users was 4M. And that's about right for the community of active "MAGA head" republicans in question. A lot of the horror and cognitive dissonance of this moment is that the mob the President aimed at Congress on Wednesday was not a weird or fringe group. They were just his fans. Look at the crowd, along with the armored people smashing windows and beating cops were smiling grandpar…
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#275Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#276Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe your takeaway there should be, "oh shit, I would have exactly the same thing, I need to rearrange my priorities so that I don't hurt people".
It sounds like that was his takeaway, except that for him it was coming from a place of empathy and not anger.
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#277Earlier quoted context omitted.
Talk about hyperbole. In no way did even 1% of the population on Parler want mass executions for people like you.
There's no hyperbole in the comment. It can still be a safe haven for extremists even if most of the users are not.
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#278There is an inappropriate use of the word "researcher" in the title. More appropriately this should read "...scraped via IDOR vulnerability."
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#279Earlier quoted context omitted.
Talk about hyperbole. In no way did even 1% of the population on Parler want mass executions for people like you.
Data, evidence? The threat is in giving the fascist terrorist 1% a microphone not that the other 99% happen to be listening. Parler was lax in policing that 1%.
I am equally concerned about what happened about the Capitol, but the actions taken by tech in response are unacceptable to me.
Re: 70TB of Parler users’ messages, videos, and posts leaked by security researchers
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not gonna lie: I find it very difficult to be upset by this when the site was a haven for people who want to mass executions for people like me. For me, the world is a little more complex than "privacy at all costs." It's hard to decide where to draw the line.
Talk about hyperbole. In no way did even 1% of the population on Parler want mass executions for people like you.
You think you can assert with confidence that there are not 40,000 people with Parler accounts who want mass executions?
I'd like to think you're right, but I'm not as confident as you are.
Not after watching someone beat a Capitol Police officer to death with a flag pole flying the American Flag. People think they are defending their country against evil. Like me, apparently.
How many QAnon followers are there? How many believe the most outrageous claims? I would not be surprised if 40,000 do. Would you?