Live data from Hacker News

Docker to rate limit image pulls

docker.com

271–274 of 274 posts

Re: Docker to rate limit image pulls

#271
The real reason this is a problem, is that docker hub has never focused on implementing standard and secure features for account management. Even with the recently implemented access tokens, there's no way for me to limit the scope of those tokens to a specific organization or image, and thus it's no different from a password.

That means if I build something from one organization, it's going to impact the ability to build something for another organization.

This effort seems to me like they are trying to disguise a last ditch effort to stay afloat.

Now that github, gitlab, and other great image repository options exist that don't lack these inherent security/integration features, anyone impacted can easily switch providers for no cost.

This new rate limiting won't help anything for docker, it's just going to kick off the exodus away from docker. Ironically, it's this account/security/integration stuff that they lacked focus on that lost them so much financial opportunity to begin with.

Re: Docker to rate limit image pulls

#272
People are also forgetting how newer docker infrastructures use multi-arch and multi-stage builds, meaning a single build could count for dozens of manifest hits, especially with distributed caching.

All the things docker has been working for to enhance the build tooling will now be more difficult to use, even if the user never stores a single image of their own on docker hub.

Re: Docker to rate limit image pulls

#273
post #64
post #5

I kinda wonder if Docker as a company is struggling. Redhat made Podman which is a compatible replacement, Then there's swarm but apparently that's not recommended and actively developed anymore, then as far as I know they sold off their enterprise clustering product. Seems Kubernetes is the popular thing now even if a bit complex to setup. Wonder what the current business model? Pretty neat idea of using containers,…

Yes Docker seems to be struggling as a company. But I doubt Podman has anything to do with it. The adoption of Docker open-source tools is massive and 99% of its users have never heard of podman or any other clones, and likely never will. The problem is simply that those tools are free, and Docker has failed to convert the success of their free tools into a successful business.

It’s partly open source and partly freeware. They could just make docker for windows/mac a paid software. I would pay for it if they would listen more to the community when a bug is found. They seem to ignore many bugs Docker Desktop on GitHub. I like about the podman Tools that there is a community effort from Red Hat. It’s not 100% compatible with docker and probably never will. So I will just hope that Microsoft or Canonical buys Docker and make it more open to the Community.

Re: Docker to rate limit image pulls

#274
post #5

I kinda wonder if Docker as a company is struggling. Redhat made Podman which is a compatible replacement, Then there's swarm but apparently that's not recommended and actively developed anymore, then as far as I know they sold off their enterprise clustering product. Seems Kubernetes is the popular thing now even if a bit complex to setup. Wonder what the current business model? Pretty neat idea of using containers,…

> Podman which is a compatible replacement, Kinda... It doesn't support caching layers for example which makes it very different in practice.

It’s still amazing that there is an alternative. It must be tedious to copy such a bad CLI design over to podman. LXD CLI is far superior.
Post reply on HN