Live data from Hacker News

GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

twitter.com

271–280 of 280 posts

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This, I agree with. However, I still see a value in relinquishing problematic language early and often.

"master" isn't problematic, though.

If it's not problematic, then why would GitHub put in the time to make this change? In your worldview, it might not be problematic, but for others it is.

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#272

I'm a strong supporter of social justice. I don't really object to people putting in work to change language like that if they think it's important. Especially when the work required is minimal. That said, this is slightly ridiculous. Have customers seriously complained about the term "master"? And my impression was that the usage was more similar to "master copy" than "master of the plantation". Honestly, it's frust…

Exactly. Is MC Hammer going to change his name too? I don't think so.

EDIT: in case anyone's confused: MC = Master of Ceremonies

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#273

Nobody cares about the black slave auctions going on in Libya RIGHT NOW. But we are going to remove the word master from our software because it offends people whose ancestors were slaves generations ago.

I find it a bit condescending and tone deaf too.

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#274

If it helps normalise the removal of problematic terminology in tech then this feels like a positive thing. Software development has a troubling history of being an overwhelmingly straight, white, male space, ridding ourselves of terminology that causes friction to new developers who don't fit the standard model has got to be a good thing. I'm certain that most people would see renaming master to main as fairly benig…

> Software development has a troubling history of being an overwhelmingly straight, white, male space... Software engineering is incredibly diverse. There are many East Asians, South Asians, Middle Easterners, and people from underprivileged backgrounds from former Soviet block countries. It also has a relatively high percentage of just unique folks. Software engineering also has a diversity problem with respect to f…

I here Brazil's tech scene was able to attract a lot of latinos. Maybe a template we could apply elsewhere.

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#275
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel the same way, and it’s depressing that people have to risk their reputation over this. If this was about people waving confederate flags or holding Nazi banners, we should do our best to keep those people out because these are symbols of ill intent used to send a clear message of hate towards minorities. But I have never seen people use the noun “master” as a symbol to spread hate. Moreover, I don’t think many…

"Moreover, I don’t think many people have even thought of slavery when referring to “master” in CS context before it was brought up in this manner." That's probably true, and it's probably people who didn't have grandparents that were slaves. It's closer in mind to some more than others. And if we want to have CS be more open to the black community, then being sensitive to how words can turn people off is important.

Banning the use of a common noun is distractive and inflammatory while doing nothing at all to address the real issues. What are we going to do when the whole software industry is done wasting countless man-hours of work renaming git branches? Ban the use of the word "order" because that too might remind someone of slavery? This is just an endless rabbit hole that leads us nowhere. Why not we just address racial inequality directly?

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#276

It's a self censoring in western. It's anti-intellect. It happened and is happening in China. The result is a small group shuts up everyone. They could tag everything they don't like and stop using it, e.g. winnie. Please don't let it happen.

It's being sensitive to how words can undermine entire classes of people. Growing up kids used to say "that's so gay" all the time in school. Did they literally mean a shoe was homosexual? No, but they're using a sexuality in a bad or derogatory sense. And that sucks and is wrong, and being gay, it was offensive and destructive to hear. Luckily people eventually shifted away from it with some awareness. This isn't th…

self censoring is even worse. What is happing in west now seems to me that some people don't allow others to talk with tags like racism etc, they punish others with losing job, internet bulling etc.

That's really scary!! In long run, you lost the freedom!

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's being sensitive to how words can undermine entire classes of people. Growing up kids used to say "that's so gay" all the time in school. Did they literally mean a shoe was homosexual? No, but they're using a sexuality in a bad or derogatory sense. And that sucks and is wrong, and being gay, it was offensive and destructive to hear. Luckily people eventually shifted away from it with some awareness. This isn't th…

self censoring is even worse. What is happing in west now seems to me that some people don't allow others to talk with tags like racism etc, they punish others with losing job, internet bulling etc. That's really scary!! In long run, you lost the freedom!

Rephrase it a bit.

Don't use moral or ethics to replace law. Otherwise you are using thought police to replace police.

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#278
post #141

I like the name change. It’s shorter and makes more sense. If the current name affects many people in a negative way then I support the name change.

It doesn't. No one is offended by this.

Some are offended but not the majority.

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#279
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel the same way, and it’s depressing that people have to risk their reputation over this. If this was about people waving confederate flags or holding Nazi banners, we should do our best to keep those people out because these are symbols of ill intent used to send a clear message of hate towards minorities. But I have never seen people use the noun “master” as a symbol to spread hate. Moreover, I don’t think many…

"Moreover, I don’t think many people have even thought of slavery when referring to “master” in CS context before it was brought up in this manner." That's probably true, and it's probably people who didn't have grandparents that were slaves. It's closer in mind to some more than others. And if we want to have CS be more open to the black community, then being sensitive to how words can turn people off is important.

Lol.

Re: GitHub is working on renaming default branch from “master”

#280
post #271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"master" isn't problematic, though.

If it's not problematic, then why would GitHub put in the time to make this change? In your worldview, it might not be problematic, but for others it is.

Because they are paid to support agenda. It is so obvious can't even get how many devs can't see.

Banning words is the real threat to everyones freedom, not just blacks Shame on every supporter: good intention, maximum naivety, horrible execution.

Post reply on HN