Live data from Hacker News

Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used

theverge.com

271–275 of 275 posts

Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used

#271
post #146
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://developers.chrome.com/apps/migration Everything except advanced File System APIs are supported by PWAs, including Bluetooth through the Web Bluetooth API. [1] The replacement Native File System API is in origin trial and is pre-standardization, however. [2] [1] https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2015/07/interact-w... [2] https://web.dev/native-file-system/

Another big gap is the sockets API. Chrome apps have direct access to TCP and UDP sockets. PWAs can't have this for obvious reasons.

[deleted]

Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used

#272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Claiming that them saying it is them thinking they are being witty is disputing the validity of their complaint.

For example: I could constantly remark on the current bad weather using an unfunny joke. Somebody could complain about my terrible sense of humour without implying it was actually lovely outside.

You're still claiming that people are saying it just to be witty/funny. They aren't. It is a legitimate concern that people should be informed of, if they aren't aware.

Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For example: I could constantly remark on the current bad weather using an unfunny joke. Somebody could complain about my terrible sense of humour without implying it was actually lovely outside.

You're still claiming that people are saying it just to be witty/funny. They aren't. It is a legitimate concern that people should be informed of, if they aren't aware.

> You're still claiming that people are saying it just to be witty/funny.

You see that word "just" in there? That's the bit I disagree with.

It is possible to both agree with someone and dislike how they express themselves.

Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used

#274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're still claiming that people are saying it just to be witty/funny. They aren't. It is a legitimate concern that people should be informed of, if they aren't aware.

> You're still claiming that people are saying it just to be witty/funny. You see that word "just" in there? That's the bit I disagree with. It is possible to both agree with someone and dislike how they express themselves.

Hacker News is not a person, and you will only drive yourself insane if you treat a conversation with a collective like it is a person.

Re: Google is finally killing off Chrome apps, which nobody really used

#275

Earlier quoted context omitted.

people supporting enterprise. enterprise software is bad to begin with and often has long shelf lives. ActiveX, old java, flash et al are all still flourishing at a large corp near you

So sadly true. Why does my company's spam filter require Flash in order to view a list of messages that were flagged? That's insane.

training sites(internal/external) will be using flash/java for a long long time
Post reply on HN