Live data from Hacker News

Adblock Radio: An adblocker for live radio streams and podcasts

github.com

271–278 of 278 posts

Re: Adblock Radio: An adblocker for live radio streams and podcasts

#271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is all speculation and without knowing concrete numbers, one can't make any definitive statements about why coffee costs $x and a podcast costs $y. I'm sure performing quality research costs many man hours, traveling, opportunity costs for stories that don't pan out, legal costs, etc. At the end of the day, however, all you need is the fact that there are no successful paid podcasts, and the most successful ones…

> This is all speculation and without knowing concrete numbers, one can't make any definitive statements about why coffee costs $x and a podcast costs $y. There are economic principles, though. In competitive markets, price is roughly what the market will bear. Physical goods have a price floor, because you can't sustainably sell such goods for below manufacturing costs. Digital goods scale for free, which removes an…

What I always wonder is: what will happen when Star Trek style replicators are invented, and physical goods can also be copied and printed out infinitely many times at practically zero cost? Will that coffee’s price drop to $0.01? If I replicate that coffee, will I be an illegal coffee pirate? Will the government make replicators illegal?

Re: Adblock Radio: An adblocker for live radio streams and podcasts

#272
for one thing, I don't mind ads in podcasts since they're usually relevant and use no tracking. Ads like those, are a pass. What I hate are the intrusive ads on the web & mobile that want to track the color of your underwear: looking at your fb. & I think the path to a sustainable open web is having a small dose of non intrusive ads e.g just a static banner for a sponsor on a site. no tracking or maybe coupon codes.

Re: Adblock Radio: An adblocker for live radio streams and podcasts

#273
post #206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I choose to define "unsolicited attempts to take my attention away from things I care about" as harm. I am happy to be sold things, on my own terms. I don't need ads to find out about things to buy.

You can't get much weaker and softer than this right here. I'm just trying to imagine the PTSD you must experience when faced with billboards on the highway or when you attend a sporting/musical event and see BoA plastered around the venue. Also, it's not "unsolicited" when you made the choice to turn on the radio and turn up the volume. If you don't like the ads, turn the radio off. > I am happy to be sold things, o…

> when faced with billboards on the highway

I've always had a problem with this, who thought it was a good idea to allow large colourful structures literally designed to capture the attention of people operating heavy machinery next to places where they are travelling at high speeds?

Re: Adblock Radio: An adblocker for live radio streams and podcasts

#274
post #206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I choose to define "unsolicited attempts to take my attention away from things I care about" as harm. I am happy to be sold things, on my own terms. I don't need ads to find out about things to buy.

You can't get much weaker and softer than this right here. I'm just trying to imagine the PTSD you must experience when faced with billboards on the highway or when you attend a sporting/musical event and see BoA plastered around the venue. Also, it's not "unsolicited" when you made the choice to turn on the radio and turn up the volume. If you don't like the ads, turn the radio off. > I am happy to be sold things, o…

The PTSD thing was at best rude, so that leaves me wondering...

Which advertising relaated business are you in?

Re: Adblock Radio: An adblocker for live radio streams and podcasts

#275
post #3

Hello, author of Adblock Radio here. Thanks for posting this. I can answer questions if you have any. You can read more on the context of this project in this article: https://www.adblockradio.com/blog/2018/11/15/designing-audio...

Wonder if this can be applied to generic audio on Android. Also for things like YouTube ads.

Possibilities are endless.

Can this be applied to sponsor messages on podcasts. Wonder if there's enough of a difference to notice it.

Re: Adblock Radio: An adblocker for live radio streams and podcasts

#276
post #206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I choose to define "unsolicited attempts to take my attention away from things I care about" as harm. I am happy to be sold things, on my own terms. I don't need ads to find out about things to buy.

You can't get much weaker and softer than this right here. I'm just trying to imagine the PTSD you must experience when faced with billboards on the highway or when you attend a sporting/musical event and see BoA plastered around the venue. Also, it's not "unsolicited" when you made the choice to turn on the radio and turn up the volume. If you don't like the ads, turn the radio off. > I am happy to be sold things, o…

> If you don't like the ads, turn the radio off.

This is pretty much exactly what the OP project does.

Re: Adblock Radio: An adblocker for live radio streams and podcasts

#277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you pay for your content then?

I listen to music on Spotify, I watch shows and movies on Netflix and Amazon Video. I buy my video games on GOG and Steam. I buy my books and read them on my Kindle. What does that leave? I don't pay for YouTube, for example. Not that I care that much, because the stuff I watch on YouTube is mostly not the stuff I would miss. The stuff I would miss would probably be available even if YouTube didn't exist (e.g. Zero P…

Volunteer Editors

Re: Adblock Radio: An adblocker for live radio streams and podcasts

#278
post #228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this sustainable?

Sam Harris' podcast runs entirely on donations, so I think that model is at least viable for certain audience demographics.

> Sam Harris' podcast runs entirely on donations

He seems to be shifting away from that. There is a "private feed" that will "increasingly carry content that will not be available on the public one" (from first 20sec of Making Sense #168). So yeah, he either wants more income or just donations isn't that great.

Post reply on HN