Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't understand why folks subject themselves to this for $1000 when other options are available. You don’t have to keep supporting Samsung by buying their phones. Get a pixel instead.
Google branded hardware has a notorious reputation for problems about 1-1.5 year down the road. This has happened with every single Google device anyone in my family has ever owned and so we've basically stopped buying Google. Very few manufacturers apart from Samsung come close to Apple in terms of sheer hardware quality and service support and Apple OS's lack of customisability, pathetic camera and lack of 3.5mm ja…
Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
271–280 of 323 posts
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#272Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
I got an S10 because of the headphone jack and sd card slot. I uninstalled or disabled any software I didn't need pretty easily. I find it to be a fantastic phone.
Those things are available on cheaper phones that don't come with so many ads. (for example, the Moto G7. Of course, lots of people have Lenovo concerns)
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#274Earlier quoted context omitted.
The sane thing would have been to not use a HTTP server at all. This part is pure laziness. It is trivial to communicate with a Windows service locally through named pipes.
I think you're referring to the SupportAssist Client being an HTTP server - while it is weird that they exposed all those other routes, the driver install route allows for drivers to be installed from a website (which a named pipe would not). I wouldn't characterize it as "pure laziness" - more a questionable feature
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#275OEM: Let's differentiate our otherwise commodity hw product! OEM: I know, let's add value with bundled software the customer can't uninstall! Then the bundled software turns out to (inevitably) be useless vulnerable garbage. Inevitably because a) the customer doesn't need it, b) it's engineered with all the effort that normally goes into adware for captive audiences (i.e., _minimal_), which means it will be vulnerabl…
It works, too. This is partly why the iPhone was so popular, at first. It's been so long now that probably everyone has forgotten, but before the iPhone, essentially every smartphone on the market was fully loaded with trialware, crapware, and often had hardware features locked out by software so that you could pay extra to unlock them. I remember one particular phone that had four user-configurable hardware buttons,…
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#276OEM: Let's differentiate our otherwise commodity hw product! OEM: I know, let's add value with bundled software the customer can't uninstall! Then the bundled software turns out to (inevitably) be useless vulnerable garbage. Inevitably because a) the customer doesn't need it, b) it's engineered with all the effort that normally goes into adware for captive audiences (i.e., _minimal_), which means it will be vulnerabl…
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#277Earlier quoted context omitted.
It works, too. This is partly why the iPhone was so popular, at first. It's been so long now that probably everyone has forgotten, but before the iPhone, essentially every smartphone on the market was fully loaded with trialware, crapware, and often had hardware features locked out by software so that you could pay extra to unlock them. I remember one particular phone that had four user-configurable hardware buttons,…
Yep. FM Radio was a common feature back in the day.
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
It works, too. This is partly why the iPhone was so popular, at first. It's been so long now that probably everyone has forgotten, but before the iPhone, essentially every smartphone on the market was fully loaded with trialware, crapware, and often had hardware features locked out by software so that you could pay extra to unlock them. I remember one particular phone that had four user-configurable hardware buttons,…
There were smartphones before the iPhone?
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#279OEM: Let's differentiate our otherwise commodity hw product! OEM: I know, let's add value with bundled software the customer can't uninstall! Then the bundled software turns out to (inevitably) be useless vulnerable garbage. Inevitably because a) the customer doesn't need it, b) it's engineered with all the effort that normally goes into adware for captive audiences (i.e., _minimal_), which means it will be vulnerabl…
It works, too. This is partly why the iPhone was so popular, at first. It's been so long now that probably everyone has forgotten, but before the iPhone, essentially every smartphone on the market was fully loaded with trialware, crapware, and often had hardware features locked out by software so that you could pay extra to unlock them. I remember one particular phone that had four user-configurable hardware buttons,…
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know the current situation, but in the past most US carrier-sold phones have not had the antenna pin connected on the chip.
I'm not sure exactly what it is, though I know all the S7s do. I suppose it may be carrier-locked? I bought mine unlocked, not via a carrier. It's a handy feature, though. Free music and entertainment with zero data spent. I've got to wonder why people moved away from it. No signal issues either.