Live data from Hacker News

Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

namepros.com

271–280 of 435 posts

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#271
post #85

Don't fall for it duckduckgo! If you change your name to duck, your name will no longer be searchable! It's a trap!

When I ask Google for "duck", duckduckgo is literally the first hit. My experience may be biased, because I am from Germany, but outside of English speaking countries, they should do just fine.

Incognito search from Iowa.

Top hit - duckduckgo.com

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#272

Nice! Now DuckDuckGo needs to just change their name to Duck Search and it can be used as a verb. No longer will you have to say "Did you DuckDuckGo it?" and can instead say "Did you Duck it?". Even on the domain alone I will use Duck more since I won't have to type in the full DuckDuckGo.com domain. I _feel_ like this could really bring some measurable growth to Duck search. I _feel_ like I certainly will use it mor…

DUCK IT! WE'LL DO IT LIVE!

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#273
post #251
post #12

This is cool and I hope it leads to a rebranding. While I like DDG a lot, the name has always felt off-putting to me. I'd much rather say "I'll just search Google" than "I'll just search DuckDuckGo." Does an extra syllable really cause that much additional friction?

DDG will never reach some groups without a rebrand. I once installed Firefox on my folks's PC and changed the browser to DDG. My mum opened it instead of Chrome by mistake and said something like > WTF is this duck thing? Where's Google? I think that wouldn't have happened if it had a more serious name.

Eh. People mocked Google's name when they were gaining dominance. "Sounds like baby noise, not a serious company" seemed to be the dominant take of those with that view at the time.

I think there's something to three-word names being less memorable than shorter ones, especially when there isn't a clearer hint to function built in.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#274
NamePros user, Thelma, made a good point:

> The story of Microsoft floating a significant loan to Apple in order to keep Apple solvent in the late '90's is well-known. Microsoft didn't do so out of altruistic impulse; they did so to decrease the odds they'd be the target of anti-trust legislation. I'm sure the c-suite at Google is very aware of that history lesson, and you'd be hard-pressed to find a more likely anti-trust target than Google. Alphabet was a proactive effort to stay ahead of that curve. This is another. It's also why I suspect they either gifted Duckduckgo the domain, or sold it at a modest price. Even if they squeezed Duckduckgo for every penny they could and maximized the duck.com sale price, that's a penny in the couch for Google, and of insignificant benefit, compared to the license to print money that they maintain as a monolith.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#275
post #166

Google is like a french word that rolls off the tongue. Duck is like a anglo/norse, sharp and harsh but satisfying like our other favorite 4 letter word.

It made me wonder if ente.de is in use (Ente is Duck in German). It is .. and it's full of 90s Internet.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#276

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why it was squatting?

If you own a domain you have no intent to use, which someone else may conceivably want, you're squatting.

Google owned the domain because they acquired a company that used to be named "Duck Corporation" and predated DuckDuckGo.

A few months ago, DuckDuckGo asked for the domain, Google agreed to give it to them for free, and the transfer took place today.

That doesn't really seem like squatting, at least not how the term is generally used.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#277

Nice! Now DuckDuckGo needs to just change their name to Duck Search and it can be used as a verb. No longer will you have to say "Did you DuckDuckGo it?" and can instead say "Did you Duck it?". Even on the domain alone I will use Duck more since I won't have to type in the full DuckDuckGo.com domain. I _feel_ like this could really bring some measurable growth to Duck search. I _feel_ like I certainly will use it mor…

My partner and I use "let me quack that" instead of "let me Google it".

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#278
post #19

I'm hoping the phrase "duck it" will become as widespread as "Google it"

I always say, "Search for," e.g. "I searched for it online"

I hate how Google has become a verb and I don't want to see another one named after a company. I miss the days of Lycos, Hotbot, Dogpile, Excite and where you could search for terms on different engines and get different results.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#280
post #251
post #12

This is cool and I hope it leads to a rebranding. While I like DDG a lot, the name has always felt off-putting to me. I'd much rather say "I'll just search Google" than "I'll just search DuckDuckGo." Does an extra syllable really cause that much additional friction?

DDG will never reach some groups without a rebrand. I once installed Firefox on my folks's PC and changed the browser to DDG. My mum opened it instead of Chrome by mistake and said something like > WTF is this duck thing? Where's Google? I think that wouldn't have happened if it had a more serious name.

Whats hard about saying "Its a search engine like google, only it doesn't track you. Try it."?
Post reply on HN