Live data from Hacker News

California Moves to Require 100% Clean Electricity by 2045

bloomberg.com

271–280 of 397 posts

Re: California Moves to Require 100% Clean Electricity by 2045

#271
post #264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We need to lay all these informations on a large map, so we don't have to speculate. That said, I'm sure most of the western world is in blind oppulence. So much shit is thrown out or spoiled for no reason it's crazy.

>That said, I'm sure most of the western world is in blind oppulence. Do you want to know how I know you're out of touch?

In France, reports are quoting 30% of edible food thrown away. Is it much better elsewhere ? I suppose not

Re: California Moves to Require 100% Clean Electricity by 2045

#272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where is this desire rooted in?

All I can really say is I want one because from the moment I saw one on the road, I just knew I had to drive it. I really love the appearance. I've never been interested in cars, but I can't help myself looking at pickups on the road driving by -- especially RAMs. Maybe I'm just a big kid, I've always liked big stuff. Still... I know they aren't good for the environment, which means I wouldn't be able to live with my…

If you're ever in the Austin Texas area look me up and you can drive my Ram 2500 diesel around. It's a highly over-rated experience, IMHO.

Re: California Moves to Require 100% Clean Electricity by 2045

#273
post #122

We are going to need some more big batteries. Don’t we pay our neighbors to take our excess during peak times?

Get a clue and do the math. (Seriously, this is a one-to-two hour google for info and apply third-grade arithmetic back-of-an-envelope project.) Batteries are NOT the answer - the quantity of batteries required is astronomically beyond the world's battery production capacity, even in Musk's most fevered dreams. Seriously - the mining impact of REALLY trying to build enough batteries to stabilize an area the size of C…

Could you please stop being so thorny? It doesn't make your point any clearer, it just makes the discussion worse.

Re: California Moves to Require 100% Clean Electricity by 2045

#274
post #235
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Moving from the Midwest, I can't believe how poorly insulated things are in CA. Our first apartment in Santa Monica had windows that didn't even seal properly when closed. ... yeah. Because it's in Santa Monica. Without even bothering to ask details about your personal temperature preference or the size or construction date of the homes, I can 100% guarantee you you're using less energy on climate control in SoCal…

As someone who has lived in both So Cal and the Midwest, I can confirm this. In So Cal, I didn't have A/C for 10+ years and rarely used the heater (a desktop computer can double as a heater haha). In the midwest, the A/C or heater is on pretty much 24/7 because even when the temperatures look favorable, there is humidity.

> a desktop computer can double as a heater

Servers are so much better...

http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/4U/847/SC847BE1C4...

Re: California Moves to Require 100% Clean Electricity by 2045

#275

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's probably been the main driver over time

The effects are felt elsewhere, too. Most manufacturers aren't going to design two versions of a model for two regions, the energy efficient one, and the less energy efficient one. They'll just work to make one that fits the more stringent one. California has been one of the biggest drivers of EE nationwide because of that. It's interesting to see it in practice too; if you move to California and bring a car, part of…

This is possible because CA is the biggest economy in the US (6th largest worldwide) so the manufacturers can't ignore it.

Re: California Moves to Require 100% Clean Electricity by 2045

#276

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The first gasoline engines used carburetors, they weren't added after lead was added.

Sorry i meant catalytic converter (katalysatorer in Danish)

Catalytic converters are ruined by leaded gasoline, hence the switch to unleaded gas.

Re: California Moves to Require 100% Clean Electricity by 2045

#277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the topic of large cars, what is the solution here? I can imagine forcing people to replace A/C units won’t be so objectionable, especially if it’s free to do so, but there may be some real opposition to requiring people to drive different cars. Nobody gets attached to an A/C. I don’t drive right now - I take public transport everywhere - but I’d love a large car (a Dodge RAM). If I try to buy something small to b…

Why isn't a fee&dividend widely accepted as the solution here? I don't mind if you buy and drive a dodge ram or a Sherman tank, as long as you reimburse me for the harm it does to me and my child.

How would you like me to reimburse you?

I'm being serious -- I would be willing to do something to reduce or eliminate my environmental impact. Would carbon offsetting be enough, or is there something else I can do?

Re: California Moves to Require 100% Clean Electricity by 2045

#278
post #272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All I can really say is I want one because from the moment I saw one on the road, I just knew I had to drive it. I really love the appearance. I've never been interested in cars, but I can't help myself looking at pickups on the road driving by -- especially RAMs. Maybe I'm just a big kid, I've always liked big stuff. Still... I know they aren't good for the environment, which means I wouldn't be able to live with my…

If you're ever in the Austin Texas area look me up and you can drive my Ram 2500 diesel around. It's a highly over-rated experience, IMHO.

I might have to take you up on that offer. It's been too long since I visited Texas.

Re: California Moves to Require 100% Clean Electricity by 2045

#279
post #16

I understand this is amazing and totally love my state for doing it, but man seeing 2045 is always a little dismaying as I wish we could be even more aggressive. 2035 for example. I realize I am being too ambitious, but we went to space in a decade why not 100% clean energy in 1.5?

They knew how to go to the moon in 1961, at least in principle. It was "just" engineering. They don't know how to get to 100% renewables, not even in principle. (The 100% plans need a storage technology that doesn't exist, yet.)

Re: California Moves to Require 100% Clean Electricity by 2045

#280
post #216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> vertical-drum washing machines (!!!) There are a number of issues with front-loading washers. While they use less water, they are also worse at cleaning clothes and much worse at sanitizing them. There was a recent post here on HN where a biologist did several experiments in her own washer to show how poorly they sanitized things compared to her older one. They also tend to trap water in the bottom and it gets must…

This sort of thing is why I sort of hate energy star everything. Take dishwashers, for example. You can regulate the energy and water usage all you want, but it long ago got to the point where dishwashers that meet regulations basically fail to clean the dishes. Which is fine, it just causes the consumer to wash the dishes by hand either instead of or in addition to using the dishwasher. So now the dishwasher uses le…

Our Bosch washer on ECO setting takes a long time but washes very well. Not a problem if you are setting it going at bed time.
Post reply on HN