I wrote about this recently[1]. The "problem" with RSS, that essentially lead to it falling out of favour, is that it is pure consumption, not interaction. You can't "like" an update that comes to you via RSS, nor comment, nor easily share. It's difficult for sites to monetise it, or track, or promote their own agenda. It's not "social" and since every other site these days needs to be social, whether through aforeme…
This (probably correctly) assumes that the average user stays 'dumb' forever. The 'intelligent' user would understand the benefits of rss, demand them from their news outlets and be willing to pay, if necessary, an appropriate amount of money for it. This will probably never happen but I maintain the view that if you want the web to become a better place you have to find ways to educate the (average) user.
RSS: there's nothing better
271–280 of 295 posts
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm pretty happy they did, since it made me aware of feedly, which is much nicer!
Tried feedly and it did not stick for reasons I no longer recall :-)
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#273Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#274Just deleted my Facebook account in about two weeks ago and started consuming news through RSS and through Podcasts and some YouTube channels (which are also, surprisingly, RSS). I've never felt better. This might be a stretch, but this has been a good alternative to the way I was consuming online media, indeed less useless info seems to be reaching me. However, it all depends on the material you're subscribing to.
YouTube is very friendly towards the RSS readers from my experience.
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#275Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder if Firefox could help fix the problem by putting RSS/Atom discovery into the browser in a prominent way.
It’s there, pick Customise from the menu and drag the RSS icon into the bar. But they’re not interested in actively working on it – suggested features like hiding it instead of greying it out based on feed presence are closed due to a lack of interest. I think ideally they’re want it to be an extension.
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#276so whats a good rss reader in 2017?
rss2email: https://github.com/wking/rss2email
This is especially nice for my grandmother, who has an iPad. I found no RSS reader there that is easy to use enough, free and ad-free.
I just wanted something I can just give a RSS link to and it fetches this link and shows content. And nothing else. This does not seem to exist.
My grandmother knows how to read and write emails. Blog posts are rendered properly using rss2email in her mailbox. And she knows how to click in the email to go to the blog and comments at times. This is actually even simpler and more optimal than a dedicated RSS App. One unique easy way to get news from the family using the tablet.
And the blog is easier than Facebook (I guess - never used it). There is just our content in the pages and that’s it. No irrelevant stuff around and no notifications.
If you are looking for ways to keep in touch with a group of people in which somebody is not really into computers, this may be one nice solution.
So, thanks to the authors of rss2email.
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#277I've been seriously considering trying to consume the web solely by RSS again. All the news sites, the few twitter accounts I actually care about, HN. HN still provides RSS, and there are ways to get it for sites that don't support it, e.g. Twitter. Everything seems to be gearing more towards deliberately occupying as much of my time as possible, algorithmically selecting content that achieves this. I want out of thi…
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
digg reader works fine for me. screencap: http://i.imgur.com/3GbYB61.png link: http://digg.com/reader
I wasn't aware Digg Reader existed, thanks. Now, will my 12 year old Digg account work?
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#279I've been seriously considering trying to consume the web solely by RSS again. All the news sites, the few twitter accounts I actually care about, HN. HN still provides RSS, and there are ways to get it for sites that don't support it, e.g. Twitter. Everything seems to be gearing more towards deliberately occupying as much of my time as possible, algorithmically selecting content that achieves this. I want out of thi…
A live running version of mine can be seen at: http://slownews-naivete.herokuapp.com/
Re: RSS: there's nothing better
#280Is a feed too noisy? You can unsubscribe. But what if you had another less-drastic option to "turn it down"? That's doable if you have some way of assigning scores to individual posts within the feed. Such scores could come from the feed publisher, other places like the reader's own social media accounts, or somewhere else. Have a user-determined threshold to determine what posts are worth showing the user.
Then by "turn it down" the user means "bump the threshold up" (and vice versa). Via trial and error a user could more or less adjust it to where they want it.
This could be built using RSS as one of the building blocks, but I don't know of anything like it.