Earlier quoted context omitted.
So right on about doing the same thing by accident. Early in my life, I programmed synths in a studio - and I practiced a variation on this. I would listen to what sound they wanted, then I would play them something that was likely pretty close. They they would complain about it not being quite right, so I would play 3 or 4 different sounds that I knew were completely wrong, then return to the first sound. To which t…
I could believe that the original sound actually does seem different after the 3 or 4 other sounds were priming the brain. Our senses don't operate in isolation. Just think of #thedress, or a note played in isolation vs played after a sequence of notes in a key in which the original note does not appear.
“Just remove the duck” (2013)
261–270 of 347 posts
Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)
#262Earlier quoted context omitted.
He really nailed it with the mouse.
Yep, this thing was beautiful http://cdn.mactrast.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/2012-11-2... Apples design is hit and miss like everyone else.
I was sad when they replaced it.
Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)
#263Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not to mention that obviously Johnson was aware of how the knob worked. And I find that it's funny that people think that a Vice President can't get temperature adjusted to his liking and should or would play games with him. "Oh there he goes again" type of thing. I don't think you get to be in a position of being able to fly a President or Vice President of any country by having an attitude and not being fully respe…
> "Johnson was aware of how the knob worked" No, he wasn't. It was intentionally put in place to deceive him, and the deception worked. > "people think that a Vice President can't get temperature adjusted to his liking" Most VPs could get the temperature adjusted to their liking. Johnson was a special kind of control freak. He liked to make people uncomfortable by making it extra hot, extra cold, walking around naked…
Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's satire. He didn't actually write this and there is no missing cat.
Not so sure about that [1]: > Q: Are your articles (like Missing Missy), real emails? > A: The email articles are verbatim ... Even if his pieces are meant to be satire, IMO it's not particularly good satire. To each his own, I guess. [1] http://live.washingtonpost.com/david-thorne-internet-is-a-pl...
Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)
#265Earlier quoted context omitted.
Another version I've heard of this is with film censorship - apparently when Hitchcock made Psycho , the film censor (I think in the UK - the BBFC) wouldn't give the film a certificate because it was too extreme for the era - too much nudity, too much violence - and suggested a few cuts to just trim back some of the offending shots. Hitchock said of course he would, took the film back, and sat on it for a couple of w…
There is a story that when the animators of Avatar The Last Airbender were working on the Beach episode, they knew that if they drew the outfits the way they wanted, they would be told to tone it down. So they drew everyone in outfits far too revealing for a children's program. When, as predicted, they were told to draw something more conservative they went ahead and animated the scenes the way they originally envisi…
Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)
#266Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why does it matter what you do with the corpse? If you have to kill something, or destroy something, at least have a good reason for doing so. Cutting down a whole forest for no reason is not a good way to behave.
Cutting down a forest is only a problem if I'm not growing suitable new forest to replace it. If I'm buying meat in the store I'm definitely paying for it to be replaced. I don't see why a good reason is necessary when it comes to a renewable resource. I support demanding good reasons for non-renewable resources.
In the same way I think it's not productive to call an animal that will killed "cold cuts", I don't think it's productive to refer to a living animal as a "renewable resource".
Also implying that you can kill and waste as many of them as you like simply because you paid for it is not productive either.
In all honesty, it's disappointing to see people refer to living creatures this way.
Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)
#267There's a certain tone in this article that bothers me a bit. At least in software engineering, the idea of reviews is to find errors in code or design how ever small they are. When inspecting any code, we almost always find at least something, regardless of the level of quality. It's not about being fair, it's not personal, and it probably isn't even dependent on the reviewers personality. It's just that when the go…
About a year ago I had the misfortune of working with a program manager. He asked me to create a PowerPoint presentation on something totally unimportant and irrelevant. After failing to explain this to him, I decided to accommodate him figuring that he would become more reasonable once he knew a bit more. After emailing him the presentation, he called and asked me to switch the 2nd and 3rd bullet on one of the slide…
Also, I don't have any experience of such absurd situations despite my experience working with dozens of teams. Maybe that's because I'm from Northern Europe where professionals don't take such bullshit from anyone. Oops... perhaps slightly strong wording. Well, I guess you get the point.
Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)
#268Earlier quoted context omitted.
He really nailed it with the mouse.
There are some people who really love Apple's mice, even the notorious "hockey puck" one. (Which to be fair was actually pretty comfortable to use, assuming you ever got the damn thing pointing the right way.) I'm not one of them, but I'm not really a huge fan of mice, period -- and their current weirdo mouse-with-touch-surface certainly offers a lot of gesture control, and it's not that uncomfortable. (Granted, "The…
I've always wondered why people hate on it so much -- even if someone prefers to point with their arm rather than their fingers, surely they can understand the appeal of using fingers to point at things?
Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)
#269A story from the time recounts that Piero Soderino, the head of the powerful Florentine Republic, even told the famously irascible Michelangelo that David's nose was much too large. Michelangelo then hid some marble dust in his hand, climbed back up his ladder and pretended to do some more "chiseling" on the offending proboscis. While he did so, he let some marble dust fall from his hand. The pompous Soderino was foo…
There are countless fables about record company executives dropping by the mastering studio to hear the new hit in its finished form. They'd inevitably make some ill-posed request, of the familiar "it needs to pop more!" variety. The wily engineer directs them towards a large and important looking knob, telling them that they are free to dial in as much "pop" as they think the track needs. Of course, they screw up th…
Re: “Just remove the duck” (2013)
#270A story from the time recounts that Piero Soderino, the head of the powerful Florentine Republic, even told the famously irascible Michelangelo that David's nose was much too large. Michelangelo then hid some marble dust in his hand, climbed back up his ladder and pretended to do some more "chiseling" on the offending proboscis. While he did so, he let some marble dust fall from his hand. The pompous Soderino was foo…
Not a huge Steve Jobs fan, but I had a professor who had worked as a designer under Steve Jobs and tried something similar. Steve insisted that a new mouse needed to be just a fraction of a millimetre slimmer so a person's palm was lower and closer to the work surface. They figured he was being an unreasonable "delicate genius" and returned a few days later with the identical mouse and claimed they had reworked it to…