Live data from Hacker News

Detecting and countering misuse of AI: September 2026

anthropic.com

261–262 of 262 posts

Re: Detecting and countering misuse of AI: September 2026

#261

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Consider me incredibly skeptical of any of these claims.

Same, I don't even see how that would work since you see the full thinking traces in Kimi but are hidden with Claude. And the Deepseek one sounds even more dubious as Deepseek is one of the cheapest model around, why relay anything to a more expensive model? I'm sure even the gray market Claude prices are still higher than Deepseek.

I'm skeptical too, but there's a parallel market where people re-sell accounts and access tokens. This would make tokens much cheaper.

There's also an argument to be made that paying the token full price may be cheaper than going through your one RLHF or whatever other techniques that costs money.

Re: Detecting and countering misuse of AI: September 2026

#262

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think knowing how to build a bio weapon means one could actually build a bio weapon. It's like saying knowing how to build a nuclear weapon can easily lead to building a nuclear weapon. Advanced machinery and safety precaution is needed to engineer a virus or a bacteria to be a bio weapon. It's not something you can do in your tool shed at the moment. Also one would need lethal viruses to even start with and…

> Advanced machinery and safety precaution is needed to engineer a virus or a bacteria to be a bio weapon. It's not something you can do in your tool shed at the moment. I think the claim in this report is that it was a state or semi-state actor. They were from "blocked regions" at a "military research institute." So dismissing the threat by solely modeling it as a disgruntled layman rando is not reasonable. But you…

A state or a semi-state doesn’t need an LLM to build a bio weapon if they wanted to. They can directly hire plenty of experts that are morally corrupted enough to do it.

The reason they haven’t done so far is that it would be 100% assured mutual destruction. Us humans share more than 99.99% of our DNA and any virus/bacteria engineered to evade the immune system and kill humans would infect everyone. Such virus is HIV, it wouldn’t care who is the bad or good actors are.

We saw how dangerous even a flu like virus like Covid-19 can be. One could argue that they can make an antivirus for the bio weapon. But the problem is that the bio weapon can easily evolve in few generations and anti virus could be completely useless

Post reply on HN