Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

windowslatest.com

261–270 of 686 posts

Re: Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

#261
post #246

I don't know if it's on purpose, but I've seen a few images and videos and I can't figure out what the laptop looks like. Why are all the pictures so dark? You can't see it!

Car manufacturers did this but it was usually when the car was going to be a bit of a minger.

100%. Viz, Ferrari Luce: https://www.ferrari.com/en-EN/auto/ferrari-luce

Re: Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

#262
post #255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I worked with some of the people responsible for the Surface Book, Surface docks, and specifically the Surface Book's dock. These were hardware people (EEs), not software people, and this was after their time at MS. Unfortunately I don't remember specifics (both because it's been a few years, and because I'd probably have to fuzz details anyway), but... : Docks are horrifying products. Thunderbolt docks are doubly ho…

> It was still better than the competition Plenty of cases where Surface isn't. Microsoft like to think they can make hardware but they're no better than other OEM and it's clearly not a focus for them

When I worked at Microsoft (years ago), some employees had Surface laptops. They frequently had issues where the laptop just wasn't working right and required rebooting, at the start of a meeting where they wanted to connect the Surface laptop to a projector. Always the Surfaces, never the Lenovos. One of the Surface things split into two parts, the screen (containing the actual computer) and the keyboard. There was something weird about connecting and disconnecting those parts, some motorized docking/undocking mechanism, that caused problems.

Then Microsoft had the episode where some of their Surface hardware would not reliably stay in sleep mode and cooked itself while being transported in a bag. At the time, Microsoft tried to excuse this by claiming that "a fundamental Computer Science problem" needed to be solved to fix this issue. Strange how other manufacturers could do this without overcoming unsolvable problems in frontier CS research.

While I'm usually a die-hard Microsoft fanboi, I have concluded that their Surface line is terrible.

Re: Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

#263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They ordered in every single competing dock they could find, from that era's products, and found that every last one was garbage in some way or other, usually fatally so. It is so hard to believe that when more than 1000 employees at my employers are also using at least one dock (Dell and Thinkpad both) and using them very well.

We are talking about a situation some years past. I member there were USB docks that if you had them attached to external power and ethernet, but not a laptop, they'd instant-kill the network by sending garbage frames that would cause switches to fault off. Only around 2024-ish the situation with USB and TB docks seemed to stabilize.

I had a CalDigit TB dock -- maybe 2021-ish? -- that every time I unplugged my MacBook would take my internet offline. I thought I was insane. How is that even possible? But I finally gave up and returned it.

Thanks for finally answering this mystery for me.

Re: Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

#264

The biggest problem here is the operating system. If they could fix that, this might be enticing.

If they put Linux on it I'd buy it, but with Windows 11, no thanks.

One of the hassles with ARM machines is that you might technically be able to boot Linux on it but your Thunderbolt, display out, wireless, etc. will lack support and not work.

Re: Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

#265
post #224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they put Linux on it I'd buy it, but with Windows 11, no thanks.

I bought the Snapdragon Elite X over a year ago based on the promises of Qualcomm to bring solid Linux drivers at some point. Fast forward to today, Linux for that SoC is still a hot mess.

Yeah never buy based on future promises.

Re: Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

#266
Surfaces are great devices. My Pro 3 still gets 7 hours of battery life.

We use newer Surface laptops at work, even the artists, developers, and executives (note we are not a tech company). The laptops aren't very fast but they can take a lot of physical abuse and the batteries last all day. We don't need the top of the line, and forcing our developers to use lower powered computers actually improves the quality of the apps because they get to experience how our apps work for most of our customers and take performance into account from the beginning.

Re: Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

#267
I had the original surface and later a surface book from my employer. Both devices were horrible the digitizer for pen input was horrific. The software support was on a standstill for 6 months at a time with minimal updates later on. I won't touch first gen Microsoft hardware anymore except maybe their mice.

Re: Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

#268

My experience with Surfaces and, particularly, the Surface Book and its accompanying dock were such that I'd have to be paid to use one again. For example, the dock would get its own updates silently and brick itself randomly and the proprietary magnetic connector between the dock and the computer was prone to a poor connection. I remember many occasions trying to work and my screens just randomly blinking in and out…

I worked with some of the people responsible for the Surface Book, Surface docks, and specifically the Surface Book's dock. These were hardware people (EEs), not software people, and this was after their time at MS. Unfortunately I don't remember specifics (both because it's been a few years, and because I'd probably have to fuzz details anyway), but... : Docks are horrifying products. Thunderbolt docks are doubly ho…

Not an EE but I'll add an anecdote as a user.

I went through a period of using a Macbook Pro with a dock. At the time the best option seemed to be the Caldigit TS3. It's a sleek device but luckily someone else was footing the bill because:

- 3 of them failed on me. THREE;

- You really learn how bad cables are. I got in the habit of ordering 2-3 at a time because experience taught me that at least 1 of them would be bad or die;

- It exposed just how bad the USB-C situation was (and still is). Is this just a power cable? Or you want data too? How about an alt mode so you can do DisplayPort passthrough? Well good luck with all that. There's no cue that the cable can do any of that. And if a cable can, it's typically 3 feet or less in length, expensive and prone to failure.

A lot of people don't know how complex a modern USB-C or Thunderbolt cable really is. It typically has a chip in each end of the cable. So the failure mode is not just the cable, it's the two chips as well. Bend or twist the cable too much. Gone. Damage the head of the cable. Gone.

Oh and USB-C is made more complex because it can be plugged in either way. The cable and the chips at either end and the controller on either side need to be able to seamlessly handle all 4 combinations (or 2 of the cable is truly symmetric pin-wise; it might be, I'm not sure).

I hope that this tech is more stable now but I honestly doubt that it is.

I'm reminded of an old quote I heard (not sure from who) that said we went from a world where no cables fit but if they did, it worked, to a world where the cable always fit but nothing works. That's USB-C in a nutshell.

Docks have to handle a lot of bandwidth. Even passthrough requires bandwidth. It's a nice idea but it's a hard problem.

Re: Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

#269
post #238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they put Linux on it I'd buy it, but with Windows 11, no thanks.

Maybe I'm being overly hopeful, but given the DGX Spark only runs Linux, and this is apparently a sibling in a laptop form factor, maybe it won't be too difficult to get Linux up and running effectively? Probably (a lot) more easily than Asahi on Apple Silicon, anyway.

I'm sure someone can get the CPU/GPU running but things like wifi/bluetooth/USB ports will be rough since they will presumably integrated with the chip in a non-standardized ARM way. Almost all of the ARM laptops are basically unusable with GNU/Linux.

Re: Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra

#270
post #246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Car manufacturers did this but it was usually when the car was going to be a bit of a minger.

100%. Viz, Ferrari Luce: https://www.ferrari.com/en-EN/auto/ferrari-luce

Ironically, "luce" means light in Italian
Post reply on HN