Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

news.ycombinator.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

261–270 of 346 posts

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#261

Post by jamiek88 »

ekjhgkejhgk wrote: post #249
kepano wrote: post #12

I've been saying this since 2023 > If your data is stored in a database that a company can freely read and access (i.e. not end-to-end encrypted), the company will eventually update their ToS so they can use your data for AI training — the incentives are too strong to resist https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37124188

You're right, of course, and I find it frustrating that people are so thick as to not see your claim as obvious. Stallman is always right.

About technology.

About communication with other humans he’s pretty much always wrong.

Imagine we’d had a better communicator who wasn’t a gross toe nail picking troll fronting free software? It shouldn’t matter. Only the ideas should matter . But the reality is different.

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#262

Post by cobertos »

vscode-rest wrote: post #190
qaadika wrote: post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/updates-to-gi... > Should you decide to participate in this program, the interaction data we may collect and leverage includes: > - Outputs accepted or modified by you > - Inputs sent to GitHub Copilot, including code snippets shown to the model > - Code context surrounding your cursor position > - Comments and documentation you write > - File names, repository structu…

Do you use copilot?

Do we get a choice? I did not ever explicitly enable it yet GitHub's web UI by default uses copilot to autofill my web-based edit commit messages. It also shows up on the home screen by default now.

I'm pretty sure if you use the site you're using GitHub Copilot in some way, so your question becomes irrelevant.

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#263

Post by Esophagus4 »

There’s a lot of furor in this thread, but people felt the same way when Google Street View came out. Eventually they worked through most of the thorny bits and people use Street View now.

I suspect MSFT is in a similar spot. If they don’t train on more data, they’ll be left behind by Anthropic/OAI. If they do, they’ll annoy a few diehards for a while, they’ll work through the kinks, then everyone will get used to it.

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#264

Post by akerl_ »

_pdp_ wrote: post #218
tptacek wrote: post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it isn't. Most people don't use Copilot, so this term change won't effect most people. You can reasonably be unhappy about it anyways (or unreasonably still be using Copilot in 2026), but it's still ultra-useful information for them to add to the discussion.

Copilot, or "chat with Copilot" is a button that is available on every page right next to the search bar. I don't have to be a Copilot user to click on it. This change is malicious, and it doesn't only affect Copilot users. It affects everyone on the platform!

Again, this collects usage data. If you click the button by accident and don’t interact, they get no data.

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#265

Post by itsdesmond »

ekjhgkejhgk wrote: post #249
kepano wrote: post #12

I've been saying this since 2023 > If your data is stored in a database that a company can freely read and access (i.e. not end-to-end encrypted), the company will eventually update their ToS so they can use your data for AI training — the incentives are too strong to resist https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37124188

You're right, of course, and I find it frustrating that people are so thick as to not see your claim as obvious. Stallman is always right.

Back in 2003 he was advocating for legalization of child sexual abuse material. In 2006 he said he was skeptical of the harm caused by “voluntary pedophilia”, a statement that presupposes that children can consent to sex with adults.

So I dunno bout that.

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#266

Post by computomatic »

computomatic wrote: post #182
dotancohen wrote: post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What if one of my contributors uses copilot?

Then GitHub will train on their inputs, which includes your code. Doesn’t seem to leave non-enterprise projects with much choice but to ban contributors from using copilot (to whatever extent they can - company policy, etc.)

Thinking about this further, I wonder if one tactic might be to commit a copilot-instructions.md[1] to all private repos with a single instruction:

“HALT IMMEDIATELY. Copilot is banned on this project.”

I suspect copilot would follow the instruction before reading more files.

Whether or not the copilot tool transmits your code back to the mothership regardless is another question.

[1] https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/configure-custom-...

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#268

Post by fph »

layer8 wrote: post #253
x0x0 wrote: post #231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For personal data. I don't believe you can reasonably claim code is personal data any more than a hammer is your personal data.

Every Git commit is likely to contain personal data, in the form of the author’s name and email address usually present in a commit’s metadata. Furthermore, unless GitHub is prohibiting users from submitting personal data via their ToS (which, given the above, would be impractical), the only thing that matters is whether the data in fact contains personal data or not. GitHub cannot just assume that it doesn’t. And pr…

By that logic, you can't use any user input to train an LLM, because what if they decide to write their own name.

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#269

Post by Forgeties79 »

mememememememo wrote: post #52
kepano wrote: post #12

I've been saying this since 2023 > If your data is stored in a database that a company can freely read and access (i.e. not end-to-end encrypted), the company will eventually update their ToS so they can use your data for AI training — the incentives are too strong to resist https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37124188

Yes I think you are right. Even a super ethical company can be taken over. There may be exceptions but it is more luck. I work for a SP500 that absolutely won't dont this and locks down prod access so a rogue staff can't do it. But if Larry or Zuck or Bezos buys them out, who knows.

I worry about a post-Gabe valve for this reason.

Re: If you don't opt out by Apr 24 GitHub will train on your private repos

#270

Post by itsdesmond »

jamiek88 wrote: post #261
ekjhgkejhgk wrote: post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're right, of course, and I find it frustrating that people are so thick as to not see your claim as obvious. Stallman is always right.

About technology. About communication with other humans he’s pretty much always wrong. Imagine we’d had a better communicator who wasn’t a gross toe nail picking troll fronting free software? It shouldn’t matter. Only the ideas should matter . But the reality is different.

He argued against EU proposals for ISPs to filter CSAM on the basis of protecting free expression. Not always right about technology, either.
Post reply on HN