Live data from Hacker News

Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

wsj.com

261–270 of 319 posts

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#261

It was really easy to close out my ChatGPT account and switch to Claude. I was really only there out of inertia. I don’t do anything beyond occasional free tier stuff like rubber ducking but so far Claude is so much better.

I had already been trying Le Chat for months, for similar reasons.

So far it's been slart enough for what I need, so closing my ChatGPT subscription was a really easy decision to make.

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#262
post #222
post #182

Should it be officially marked as the date of transition from liberal democracy to illiberal democracy? Such tampering with companies is a smoking gun. Let's wait until there is another decision seizing this (or others') company assets.

secret police kidnapping people off the streets didn't clue you in?!!

If you're referring to ICE, that's gross hyperbole, and honestly a little insulting to people who live / have lived in regimes with an actual secret police.

The US is still a rights-based state, which means that when they arrest someone (legitimately or not), lawyers and human right advocates can eventually track them down.

When a secret police disappears someone, they actually disappear. Families can spend years wondering if their loved one is still alive, or was murdered by organized crime, or ran away, or was secretly taken by the state. The US these days is pretty bad, but it's nowhere near that bad.

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#263
post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Shame you didn’t donate $25 million to Trump, like the company we decided to give the contract to instead did, who will benefit tremendously from you being designated a supply chain risk. Maybe next time you’ll be a little smarter.

Have they even given a bar of gold once?

I can't recall the last time you invited me to your house for a cup of coffee.

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#264
post #9
post #6

Huh, and I thought conservatives were all about government staying our of the way of the private sector. Go figure...

Conservatives haven't had any power in Washington in decades. They are in thrall to MAGA now, which is all about seizing the means of production when its convenient.

Hate to break it to you, but Trump and MAGA are conservatives in the US. The conservative and Republican brand is tied to that wagon now. They're going to have to make a serious effort to separate the two if they ever want to get rid of the Trump stink.

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#266
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Been going on for a long time https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture

There is a substantial difference between the standard lobbying and greasing the legislative wheels, and what's going on with this current administration. Even if companies were pretending to play by the rules before, at least they had some need to put in the effort to pretend. When a society can see belligerent ostentatious corruption going on as the norm, nothing good can follow.

> Even if companies were pretending to play by the rules before, at least they had some need to put in the effort to pretend

I'm not sure that's better. I'm hopeful that all this open air corruption leads to real reform. But I'm sure I'll be disappointed.

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the implication is that democratic presidents are less likely to do dumb shit like this, which harms the economy.

A lot of people love watching dumb shit, like watching reality tv. Crucially also they often love doing dumb shit. It's a privilege they don't want to give up, like pretending gravity doesn't apply to you.

Can you imagine if the world ever actually achieved a state of utopia? Stupid people would burn it down within weeks just to have something to watch

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#268

Streisand effect I think this will boost sales

I hope so. I will never type a single thought of my own or personal detail into an OpenAI product again. I have no doubt at some point OpenAI will be asked by DoD to hand over customer data and they will do so. If I use AI at all for nonprofessional reasons it will be Anthropic/Claude.

US Gov doesn't really need a contract with anthropic to force them to hand over customer data do they? What would prevent that from happening if they are still a US based company?

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#269
post #62
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Irrelevant. The president holds all the cards, he is above the law and you are a supply chain risk if you ask anything else other than “how high” when you are told to jump. Laws or contracts are things in the past. The most a contract can do is define your limits and obligations, not your rights or privileges,

You got downvoted a bit but I upvoted. You're clearly being descriptive in your statements, not prescriptive. I tend to agree that this is how things are now. Our country is not being run by the rule of law right now.

Wrong ... their very first words were "Isn’t it actually quite fair ..."

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#270
post #69

So, DoD has done what it said it would. And OpenAI has jumped on the opportunity. I'm curious what'll openai signatories on notdivided.org do now - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47188473 Remain undivided in spirit while grinding for OpenAI?

"jumped on the opportunity" is possible, but per https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-whole-thing-was-scam it's plausible that OpenAI created this situation through straightforward bribery.

Maybe this is the first step towards the Big Beautiful Bailout when the AI bubble inevitably pops.
Post reply on HN