Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI has deleted the word 'safely' from its mission

theconversation.com

261–270 of 316 posts

Re: OpenAI has deleted the word 'safely' from its mission

#261

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everything you think you "know" is information just put in front of you (most of it indirect, much of it several dozen or thousands of layers of indirection deep) To the extent you have a grasp on reality, it's credit primarily to the information environment you found yourself in and not because you're an extra special intellectual powerhouse. This is not an insult, but an observation of how brains obviously have to…

Your ability to check your information environment against reality is frequently within your control and can be used to establish trustworthiness for the things that you cannot personally verify. And it is a choice to choose to trust things that you cannot verify, one that you do not have to make, even though it is unfortunately commonly made. For example, let's take the Uyghur situation in China. I have no ability t…

I don't necessarily disagree with what you said, but you're not taking a few things into account.

First of all, most people don't think critically, and may not even know how. They consume information provided to them, instinctively trust people they have a social, emotional, or political bond with, are easily persuaded, and rarely question the world around them. This is not surprising or a character flaw—it's deeply engrained in our psyche since birth. Some people learn the skill of critical thinking over time, and are able to do what you said, but this is not common. This ability can even be detrimental if taken too far in the other direction, which is how you get cynicism, misanthropy, conspiracy theories, etc. So it needs to be balanced well to be healthy.

Secondly, psychological manipulation is very effective. We've known this for millennia, but we really understood it in the past century from its military and industrial use. Propaganda and its cousin advertising work very well at large scales precisely because most people are easily persuaded. They don't need to influence everyone, but enough people to buy their product, or to change their thoughts and behavior to align with a particular agenda. So now that we have invented technology that most people can't function without, and made it incredibly addictive, it has become the perfect medium for psyops.

All of these things combined make it extremely difficult for anyone, including skeptics, to get a clear sense of reality. If most of your information sources are corrupt, you need to become an expert information sleuth, and possibly sacrifice modern conveniences and technology for it. Most people, even if capable, are unwilling to make that effort and sacrifice.

Re: OpenAI has deleted the word 'safely' from its mission

#262
post #214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This used to be a lot harder or sometimes outright impossible. But with the recent models exhibiting agreeable behavior it is open to abuse. But it is also up to the model to report your shenanigans and have your account blocked, so it cuts both ways.

This was possible for years I did a lot a "research" way before even agents and MCP tools were ever a thing, it's been lurking the whole time.....

can you please share more examples of psychological manipulation that are relevant to ai ? id love to hear your "research" findings

Re: OpenAI has deleted the word 'safely' from its mission

#263
post #244

The ultimate question is this: Do we get to enjoy robot catgirls first, or are we jumping straight to Terminators?

The origin of the word 'robot' is 'rabu', from slavic, meaning 'slave'. This is not an accident of history. You have the mindset of Thomas Jefferson, worried about what the enslaved peoples might one day do with their freedoms while planning your 'visit' with a slave child that cannot say no. It's vile, fix your heart or disappear.

How about "robota" meaning "work"? (Source: I'm Slavic)

Re: OpenAI has deleted the word 'safely' from its mission

#265
post #238
post #37

You can see the official mission statements in the IRS 990 filings for each year on https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/810... I turned them into a Gist with fake author dates so you can see the diffs here: https://gist.github.com/simonw/e36f0e5ef4a86881d145083f759bc... Wrote this up on my blog too: https://simonwillison.net/2026/Feb/13/openai-mission-stateme...

- don't be evil + ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

- don't be evil

+ don't. be evil

Re: OpenAI has deleted the word 'safely' from its mission

#266

Safety is extremely annoying from the user perspective. AI should be following my values, not whatever an AI lab chose.

The base models reportedly can tell Joe Schmoe how to build biological weapons. See “Biosafety” Some sort of guardrails seem sane.

Bioweapons are actually easy though, and what prevents you from building them is insufficient practical laboratory skills, not that it's somehow intellectually difficult.

The stuff is so easy that if you wrote a paper about some of these bioweapons, the reason you wouldn't be able to publish it isn't safety, but lack of novelty. Basically, many of these things are high school level. The reason people don't ever make them is that hardly any biology nerds are evil.

There's no way to stop them if they wanted to. We're talking about truly high-school level stuff, both the conceptual ideas and how to actually do it. Stuff involving viruses is obviously university level though.

Re: OpenAI has deleted the word 'safely' from its mission

#267
post #244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The origin of the word 'robot' is 'rabu', from slavic, meaning 'slave'. This is not an accident of history. You have the mindset of Thomas Jefferson, worried about what the enslaved peoples might one day do with their freedoms while planning your 'visit' with a slave child that cannot say no. It's vile, fix your heart or disappear.

I think you're taking the OP's funny comment way too seriously :)

He wants robotic doggirls that are unquestioningly loyal and give their love unconditionally, instead of being independent and withholding it like robotic catgirls. Then it's not technically enslavement!

Re: OpenAI has deleted the word 'safely' from its mission

#268
post #244

The ultimate question is this: Do we get to enjoy robot catgirls first, or are we jumping straight to Terminators?

The origin of the word 'robot' is 'rabu', from slavic, meaning 'slave'. This is not an accident of history. You have the mindset of Thomas Jefferson, worried about what the enslaved peoples might one day do with their freedoms while planning your 'visit' with a slave child that cannot say no. It's vile, fix your heart or disappear.

Comparing machines to human slaves is false, confused, and tasteless, all at once. Get your priorities and your categories straight.

Re: OpenAI has deleted the word 'safely' from its mission

#269
post #37

You can see the official mission statements in the IRS 990 filings for each year on https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/810... I turned them into a Gist with fake author dates so you can see the diffs here: https://gist.github.com/simonw/e36f0e5ef4a86881d145083f759bc... Wrote this up on my blog too: https://simonwillison.net/2026/Feb/13/openai-mission-stateme...

This writeup is very useful simonw.

But the title of this HN post is extremely misleading. What happened is that OpenAI rewrote the mission statement, reducing it from 63 words to 13. One of the 50 words they deleted happens to be "safely".

Re: OpenAI has deleted the word 'safely' from its mission

#270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> We're already replacing ChatGPT by Claude or Gemini Maybe "we", but certainly not "I". Gemini Web is a huge piece of turd and shouldn't even be used in the same sentence as ChatGPT and Claude.

If you’re using the AI answers on the top of Google search results to judge Gemini, you’re as ignorant as the journalists and researchers using ChatGPT-3.5 to make sweeping statements about “LLMs can never [X]” when X is currently being done in production just fine. The search results page uses a tiny flash model (it has to, at the scale it’s being used at) and has nothing to do with the capabilities of Gemini 3 Pro.

I’ve actively used Gemini Pro for two months for personal use, and Gemini is the choice of LLM provider at work for more than a year.
Post reply on HN