Live data from Hacker News

GPT Image 1.5

openai.com

261–270 of 272 posts

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#262

Okay results are in for GenAI Showdown with the new gpt-image 1.5 model for the editing portions of the site! https://genai-showdown.specr.net/image-editing Conclusions - OpenAI has always had some of the strongest prompt understanding alongside the weakest image fidelity. This update goes some way towards addressing this weakness. - It's leagues better at making localized edits without altering the entire image's ae…

I can't click the compliance info button on mobile. The text shows for half a second and then vanishes. Long press just marks the text for copy paste.

Hey bombthecat - thanks for pointing this out. I had some poor mobile browser detection that was causing this issue. It should be fixed now.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#263
post #46

If this was a farm of sweatshop Photoshopers in 2010, who download all images from the internet and provide a service of combining them on your request, this would escalate pretty quickly. Question: with copyright and authorship dead wrt AI, how do I make (at least) new content protected? Anecdotal: I had a hobby of doing photos in quite rare style and lived in a place where you'd get quite a few pictures of. When I…

We are probably entering the post-copyright era. The law will follow sooner or later.

Yup, just like the post-copyright era followed the dawn of the internet and the emergence of Napster.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#264

It's really weird to see "make images from memories that aren't real" as a product pitch

I can actually imagine actors selling the rights to make fake images with them. In late stage capitalism you pay for fake photos with someone. You have chat gpt write about how you dated for a summer, and have it end with them leaving for grad school to explain why you aren't together. Eventually we'll all just pay to live in the matrix. When your credit card is declined you'll be logged out, to awaken in a shared st…

> When your credit card is declined you'll be logged out, to awaken in a shared studio apartment. To eat your rations.

You're funny. No, you'll awaken in a tent, next to your shopping cart, under the bridge.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#265

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think training image models to pass these very specific tests correctly will be very difficult for any of these companies. How would they even do that?

Hire a professional Photoshop artist to manually create the "correct" images and then put the before and after photos into the training data. Or however they've been training these models thus far, i don't know. And if that still doesn't get you there, hash the image inputs to detect if its one of these test photos and then run your special test-passer algo.

I don't think a few images done by any professional will have a measurable impact in training.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#266

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the only model that legitimately passed the Giraffe prompt. 10 years ago I would have considered that sentence satire. Now it allegedly means something. Somehow it feels like we’re moving backwards.

> Somehow it feels like we’re moving backwards. I don't understand why everyone isn't in awe of this. This is legitimately magical technology. We've had 60+ years of being able to express our ideas with keyboards. Steve Jobs' "bicycle of the mind". But in all this time we've had a really tough time of visually expressing ourselves. Only highly trained people can use Blender, Photoshop, Illustrator, etc. whereas almos…

It is amazing and impressive. But also an unlimited source of trash and slop during my internet use.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Inspiring artists =/= involuntarily training privately owned LLM’s that charge for access. If you want me to hand some of my work over to artists so they can learn and grow and experiment, send them my way. Happy to help.

Inspiring artists =/= involuntarily training privately owned LLM’s that charge for access. Agreed there, which is why it's important to work for open access to the results. The resulting regime won't look much like present-day copyright law, but if we do it right, it will be better for us all. In other words, instead of insisting that "No one can have this," or "Only a few can have this," which (again) will not be op…

> In other words, instead of insisting that "No one can have this," or "Only a few can have this,

Please show me where I ever said anything remotely like that. You’re painting my stance as very all or nothing, which is inaccurate.

You’re trying to make me into some caricature that you can grind your axe against, when I’m somebody who doesn’t even agree with modern copyright law. I think we’re past the point of productivity, so I’ll just leave it there. Have a good one

Post reply on HN