Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is not using .gb a mistake? The official name of the country is The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland - Great Britain is the island containing England, Scotland and Wales. The UK also contains Northern Ireland. It would be nonsensical (technically) for Northern Irish businesses to have domains ending in .gb
Because "uk" isn't in ISO 3166-1 alpha 2, "gb" is, and the formal designation for The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is "gb". It wouldn't be nonsense for northern Irish businesses to have .gb domains, because that's what the ISO convention says it would be. The change will basically never happen though; ICANN has basically acquiesced any attempt to change it (after a weak attempt to do so in the…
When the sun will literally set on what's left of the British Empire
261–270 of 356 posts
Re: When the sun will literally set on what's left of the British Empire
#262But the real question... what will happen with .io TLD? (British Indian Ocean Territory's)
It should eventually get removed by ICANN, since the country code TLDs are managed by ISO 3166-1 alpha 2 (it's however not an exact match), and the transfer will mean the British Indian Ocean Territories will no longer exist. ISO is going to be the entity in charge of removing the io country code, which it probably will do since ISO 3166-1 alpha 2 isn't just used for domain names. There's a standardized process for t…
Side note: I suspect the real reason Google wants to discontinue goo.gl links is because they believe Trump will eventually succeed in annexing Greenland to the US.
Re: When the sun will literally set on what's left of the British Empire
#263Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is not using .gb a mistake? The official name of the country is The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland - Great Britain is the island containing England, Scotland and Wales. The UK also contains Northern Ireland. It would be nonsensical (technically) for Northern Irish businesses to have domains ending in .gb
Because "uk" isn't in ISO 3166-1 alpha 2, "gb" is, and the formal designation for The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is "gb". It wouldn't be nonsense for northern Irish businesses to have .gb domains, because that's what the ISO convention says it would be. The change will basically never happen though; ICANN has basically acquiesced any attempt to change it (after a weak attempt to do so in the…
Unfortunately the venture failed (and I went unpaid!), but the Nicaraguan NIC stepped in to continue service for the handful of .co.ni domains that had been registered at that point.
There'd been a similar effort for Scotland, using both .co.sc and .co.al (for Alba, in Scots Gaelic), but it was even less successful.
These days, there are gTLDs with .scot, .cymru, .wales, and .london existing since 2014-ish. There'll be another round of gTLD applications next year, so I suppose someone might register .unitedkingdom or .ukogbani, but the domain name goldrush days are long over...
Re: When the sun will literally set on what's left of the British Empire
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
It should eventually get removed by ICANN, since the country code TLDs are managed by ISO 3166-1 alpha 2 (it's however not an exact match), and the transfer will mean the British Indian Ocean Territories will no longer exist. ISO is going to be the entity in charge of removing the io country code, which it probably will do since ISO 3166-1 alpha 2 isn't just used for domain names. There's a standardized process for t…
> It should eventually get removed by ICANN, since the country code TLDs are managed by ISO 3166-1 alpha 2 (it's however not an exact match), and the transfer will mean the British Indian Ocean Territories will no longer exist. ISO is going to be the entity in charge of removing the io country code, which it probably will do since ISO 3166-1 alpha 2 isn't just used for domain names. Side note: I suspect the real reas…
Re: When the sun will literally set on what's left of the British Empire
#265Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because "uk" isn't in ISO 3166-1 alpha 2, "gb" is, and the formal designation for The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is "gb". It wouldn't be nonsense for northern Irish businesses to have .gb domains, because that's what the ISO convention says it would be. The change will basically never happen though; ICANN has basically acquiesced any attempt to change it (after a weak attempt to do so in the…
In the early 2000s I did a bit of consultancy for a company that'd done a deal with Nicaragua's NIC to offer ".co.ni" domains to businesses in Northern Ireland (at the time, the commercial second level domain in Nicaragua was .com.ni, so there wasn't a conflict with existing use). Unfortunately the venture failed (and I went unpaid!), but the Nicaraguan NIC stepped in to continue service for the handful of .co.ni dom…
Sorry to hear you didn’t get paid.
Re: When the sun will literally set on what's left of the British Empire
#266Earlier quoted context omitted.
> ICANN periodically lets anyone with $1 million create random new generic TLDs Why? Isn't ICANN non profit?
I'm sure any profit they make is redirected back into the organization's mission.
Re: When the sun will literally set on what's left of the British Empire
#267Earlier quoted context omitted.
France also has the longest internal scheduled flight - 9,349km https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World%27s_longest_domestic_fli...
Had*, seems it was added to work around American Covid restrictions, and it was only active for ~1 month.
The person you're responding to was talking about the Paris-Réunion flight that has been active for a long time and still active today. I took it 15 years ago when I had to go to Réunion.
Re: When the sun will literally set on what's left of the British Empire
#268Though empires are out of fashion , British colonies universally benefited from the British empire. The ones who are thriving today owe a huge debt of gratitude, and the languishing ones are that way because they decided not to continue the British tradition. The 20th century decline of the British empire is one of civilization's worst failures, on par with the decline of the Roman Empire.
> Though empires are out of fashion , British colonies universally benefited from the British empire. That's not at all true. There are many examples, but no need to look farther afield than Ireland, which has not yet recovered from the deliberate genocide of the Irish famine. The island of Ireland had not yet reached the population it held pre-famine, and if Ireland had grown at the rate of its neighbours, it would…
There's pretty clearly a distinction between different individual colonies on this one. Something like the Falkland Islands which had no indigenous population is very very different from Jamaica which was a plantation colony full of slaves, which is yet again very different something like Aden (now part of Yemen) which had about 600 people living there at the time it was annexed and which has had a very very difficult post-independence story.
Re: When the sun will literally set on what's left of the British Empire
#269Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wether you agree or not is the entire point. This is not a theoretical question about what could be done. The question is why should it happen in the first place? Why do you think people who have been there for 150 years and ask nothing more than cohabitation should be forcefully removed from a place? As I said, it is not that simple. It has absolutely nothing to do with "the sun setting on the French empire".
> The question is why should it happen in the first place? The OP never indicated if they agreed with the claims or not. They raised it just because it was relevant to the sun setting on the French Empire.
New Caledonia becoming independent would not have an effect on this though, the sun would still not set on France, as New Amsterdam and Wallis-et-Futuna are close enough to prevent that and very unlikely to leave France in the foreseeable future.
Re: When the sun will literally set on what's left of the British Empire
#270Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Because ccTLDs follow a different standard They will just move .io from ccTLD to gTLD, with the UK government's blessing. Everyone realizes there is no point in stopping the money from flowing.
They probably won't, the 2 character space is reserved for ccTLDs by their existing policies. Only 3 characters and up can be gTLDs.
Modern ICANN is not about policies for policies' sake.