Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly. The one example they use gets a 5.2 on IMDB and 42% on rotten tomatoes. Not all movies are high art, nor should they be. It’s for a certain audience. We’ve had crappy made-for-TV movies since long before streaming and it hasn’t been the death of cinema.
42% means that some professional critics considered it “fresh.” That’s scary to me.
Casual Viewing – Why Netflix looks like that
261–270 of 363 posts
Re: Casual Viewing – Why Netflix looks like that
#262Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love apocalyptic movies (even ones that are not considered great) but the few I started watching on Netflix were really bad.
Can you name a good apocalyptic movie? I'm really struggling to come up with one. Twister, sort of, and that's neither good nor apocalyptic really. Edit: Twelve Monkeys. I think that counts.
Snowpiercer (2013)
Melancholia (2011)
When the Wind Blows (1986)
Re: Casual Viewing – Why Netflix looks like that
#263It’s supposedly ragebait but it’s not actually bad. - Netflix produces the casual viewing content next to other niches, and just serves this as well. The other stuff doesn’t go away, this is in addition. - This is something you can put on during long car trips, no need to focus on the screen, just focus on the audio, and it’s easier to listen to than an audiobook (which is just a narrated actual book). - It has nothi…
They could add a tag saying if you need to pay attention to the show or not. Currently it isn't very different from the other stuff just disappearing.
Re: Casual Viewing – Why Netflix looks like that
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
They should bring back the prologue and the chorus.
And the intermission! They should call it "popcorn time"
Re: Casual Viewing – Why Netflix looks like that
#265Definitely not surprising. The quality of Netflix originals is on a decline for years. I see this label as a warning nowadays. There are enough good quality movies and shows. My life is too short to spend it with mediocre entertainment that leaves no lasting impression or thoughts. I don't need to pass time I want to make most out of it.
Re: Casual Viewing – Why Netflix looks like that
#266I think this also applies: https://medium.com/luminasticity/netflix-the-crap-you-put-up... >A signature characteristic of Netflix’s strategy over the years has been to define genres into microscopic sub-genres and develop content on very specific customer likes — for example “Urban teen geniuses who invent time travel” >There is an unfortunate issue with making things bad and to somebody’s taste — the person whose ta…
Jokes on them, my thing is bad movies.
Re: Casual Viewing – Why Netflix looks like that
#267I don’t remember the program but in the years of broadcast TV there was a writer on a nightly talk show explaining why all TV episodes were so bland. He said that he wrote an intricate plot for TV which was rejected because the show had to be watchable by someone doing this dishes. So this isn’t a phenomenon new to the Netflix era.
Re: Casual Viewing – Why Netflix looks like that
#268Plus Netflix has a lot of anime and I like that.
Re: Casual Viewing – Why Netflix looks like that
#269Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love apocalyptic movies (even ones that are not considered great) but the few I started watching on Netflix were really bad.
Can you name a good apocalyptic movie? I'm really struggling to come up with one. Twister, sort of, and that's neither good nor apocalyptic really. Edit: Twelve Monkeys. I think that counts.
Planet of the Apes, Soylent Green, and that other Charleton Heston movie with zombies that I can’t remember (not a huge fan of zombies)
The Road is a fairly recent movie that fits.
British TV had Space 1999, lots of early Doctor Who and an attempt at the Tripods series by John Christopher. By far my favorite was “Survivors” written by Terry Nation - who needs zombies when you’ve got actual problems to deal with!
Re: Casual Viewing – Why Netflix looks like that
#270Wait. They’re turning movies into audio books. That’s a good first step. Next to save bandwidth they’ll drop video and just display text on screen.
I often wonder about how much electricity is wasted (recording, encoding, transmitting, decoding) on videos where the video itself seems to add no actual value, and it would be just as effective as audio-only (or text-only) content instead. A study of YouTube videos in 2022 found that more than 15% of "videos" (i.e. billions of videos) contained only still images[1]. My wife watches a ton of short-form video (and in…
Talking heads are equivalent to (badly written) text only content too.