Live data from Hacker News

EU to greenlight Chat Control tomorrow

patrick-breyer.de

261–270 of 360 posts

Re: EU to greenlight Chat Control tomorrow

#261
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Free Speech Absolutism was/is connected with hate speech because sites that hold up such an ideal end up being the landing pad for the very worst people who were banned everywhere else. There aren't enough normal people who vote with their money/time/engagement to reach critical mass on those platforms. And turns out very few people want actually free speech. We're in a forum with strong moderation and the discussion…

I broadly agree but present two caveats. Firstly, that Germany's descent into fascism and anti-semitism were both helped by the lack of free speech. Blasphemy laws prevented the anti-semitism preached from the pulpits to be challenged, and hate speech laws actually helped the Nazis publicise their movement[1]. > Rather than deterring the Nazis and countering anti-Semitism, the many court cases served as effective pub…

This post makes no sense. Your both cases are an example where was too much "free speech" (preeches) and too few ( govermental fight against Stürmer)

I guess the analysis about Nazis in the Weimarer Republik are far more complex than a matter of free speech. It tells a lot that I never heard historians seriously discussing it in this context.

Re: EU to greenlight Chat Control tomorrow

#262
post #43
post #4

This is why the roles of the major players in society (government, monopolies) need to be circumscribed. Large organizations will always try to grow in size and power. We need some sort of human right for digital privacy to make this sort of thing illegal.

> We need some sort of human right for digital privacy to make this sort of thing illegal. That's how you get another level of super-government, i.e. one more tyrant in the chain Historically the circle breaks only with revolution and violence . Maybe checks and balances would work as a system, but the EU has neither

" Maybe checks and balances would work as a system, but the EU has neither " This is just wrong. There are courts (on EU level and national level), the council and the parlament.

Re: EU to greenlight Chat Control tomorrow

#263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Following WW2? The European Union was established in 1993 with the Maastricht Treaty

The European Coal and Steel Community , which in many ways is the precursor organization to EU was formed in 1951, with the explicit goal of linking the German and French economies to such a degree that they would be incapable of waging war against each other.

And a complete shadow of the current EU. Should we call a current intel CPU an 8086?

I only make the point because the current EU is so far removed in scope from the initial post-WW2 version

Re: EU to greenlight Chat Control tomorrow

#264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Following WW2? The European Union was established in 1993 with the Maastricht Treaty

The EU is an evolution of the EEC which is much older. The whole federation as a concept was made after and in response to WWII

A significant and huge evolution. That's why they have separate names

Re: EU to greenlight Chat Control tomorrow

#265
post #54
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> And so, 96% of people now think Signal is evil. The overwhelming majority of people living in the EU won't really care or even notice this new law/directive/(?) because they don't really pay any attention to what the EU is doing but yeah for most of of the remaining ones that will probably suffice.

Quoted in major tech press first, and then in non-tech press if the case becomes prominent enough to get to national news, would have a serious poisoning effect.

I find it very funny how alleged journalists don't care about potential violations of sources

Ah who am I kidding, real journalism is pretty much dead

Re: EU to greenlight Chat Control tomorrow

#266
post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The question is always about the circumstances. In the "think of the children" scenario the parents are incentivized to consent to some filter. (So they or someone(!!!) gets an alert if the boogeyman is talking to their kids, asking them to send nudes, or sending dick pics.) See recital 13 on top of page 7 for the definition. And see 17 on bottom of page 8 for this: "To allow for innovation and ensure proportionality…

How does something like this avoid false positives? A pretty common example in my circle is parents taking pictures of baby rashes/pimples/blisters etc to send to family doctor or doctor friends. It sounds like a situation where every parent with a toddler will end up on some list.

Maybe that's what is needed for the press and other people to pay attention to it

Re: EU to greenlight Chat Control tomorrow

#267
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We learnt the value of free speech the hard way, and very slowly. Now we need to keep extending such notions to the rapidly increasing frontiers that new tech is exposing. Hopefully with more tech-savvy generations gradually taking power, this will happen without too many painful lessons.

> We learnt the value of free speech the hard way, and very slowly Did we though? Unfortunately outside the US and a handful of other places free speech doesn't seem to be valued that much, often it's even viewed as a threat (and I'm not talking about authoritarian regimes). It's a double-edged sword to be fair, enabling misinformation and chaos.

> the US

American freedom of speech aka "you can literally be fired and see your life ruined for having a political opinion but you won't go to jail so be thankful"

Re: EU to greenlight Chat Control tomorrow

#268
post #10

Signal Foundation has already said they would leave the EU if Chat Control goes ahead. https://mastodon.world/@Mer__edith/112535616774247450

That's an interesting thread ... they claim they won't be compliant, which I applaud, but what will happen is that unwitting Signal users will end up being targeted by law enforcement. There are already precedents of people with "secure" phones or encrypted messaging apps being targeted, such as the Sky ECC case.

Well, no different from the status quo, where police finding a PGP book at your home is like them finding the anarchist's handbook or worse.

Re: EU to greenlight Chat Control tomorrow

#269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, I expect "green light" in this context means that it will make it on the EU Parliament's agenda, nothing more. That's still perilously close, but it's not done and dusted yet.

I'm pretty sure the "greenlight" on the title means they are meeting to confirm that the countries will vote in favor of the law so it can be quickly approved once it makes to the parliament: > If Chat Control is endorsed by Council now, experience shows there is a great risk it will be adopted at the end of the political process. meaning: there will be little opposition to the proposal once it reaches the MEPs.

> meaning: there will be little opposition to the proposal once it reaches the MEPs.

meaning: because the dust hasn't settled on the EU parliamentary elections, MEPs could vote without giving full attention to the law.

Call me an optimist, but I still hold hope that that's not the case.

Re: EU to greenlight Chat Control tomorrow

#270

I already kicked up a shit here in NL together with a few other well connected people (with success) but it's a little frustrating that there's little more to do other than hope that nerds in other EU countries can make a difference.

Thank you for that, I was glad to see NL on the list of against!
Post reply on HN