Live data from Hacker News

Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context

phind.com

261–270 of 358 posts

Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context

#262

Suggestion: When your title makes a claim like "Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context", link to a blog entry that explains the claim.

Here's the blog post: https://www.phind.com/blog/phind-model-beats-gpt4-fast

Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context

#265

Phind co-founder here! Here's a link to our blog post: https://www.phind.com/blog/phind-model-beats-gpt4-fast

hi; great work. so is this more fine-tuning on Phind-CodeLlama-34B-v2?

will there be api access soon?

also: will it be open-source at some point? thanks

Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context

#266

Phind co-founder here! Here's a link to our blog post: https://www.phind.com/blog/phind-model-beats-gpt4-fast

hi; great work. so is this more fine-tuning on Phind-CodeLlama-34B-v2? will there be api access soon? also: will it be open-source at some point? thanks

Thank you. Yes, it is the 7th iteration that started with our open-source models. We do plan to open source this model as well down the road, once we've released a few more generations.

API access is on the roadmap but we have no time estimates for when we will build it. We're trying to not get distracted from our main mission :)

Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context

#267

Asked it to write a program that I've written before, to compare with gpt4. Didn't really get what I was asking for, gpt4 understood it perfectly, and is ready to continue prompting toward completion. https://www.phind.com/agent?cache=cloeowfla000dl1084ermly3c vs https://chat.openai.com/share/4147da33-3669-4657-88fa-3a9dfc... Might not be representative of the whole thing, but it went on about random things I didn't…

The Pair Programmer mode currently either uses GPT-4 or GPT-3.5 (if you've run out). Please try again in the default search mode to use the Phind Model. Using the Phind Model in the default search seems to work well: https://www.phind.com/search?cache=ln6dpdtv5auwn4cq1ofg3gs9

https://www.phind.com/search?cache=z5odlx0o9lspzpfm4sfpp131

Way way better, I'm stunned. Congratulations on this

Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context

#268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

hi; great work. so is this more fine-tuning on Phind-CodeLlama-34B-v2? will there be api access soon? also: will it be open-source at some point? thanks

Thank you. Yes, it is the 7th iteration that started with our open-source models. We do plan to open source this model as well down the road, once we've released a few more generations. API access is on the roadmap but we have no time estimates for when we will build it. We're trying to not get distracted from our main mission :)

I see. Thanks!

So Phind's main mission is to overtake Google right? ;)

Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context

#269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks for the feedback. We also support GPT-4 as an answering model so users can pick and choose what's best for their use case, but we recommend the Phind Model for the majority of users.

Why is there an 8x difference in price-per-search between Plus and Pro? I always shy away from stuff like this because I view it as one of two things. Either I'm getting ripped off if I pay for Plus, because 8x the cost to me means your margin is huge, or I'm getting subsidized by you with the Pro version which means I can't rely on it lasting long term. I also dislike daily limits for search. My search usage isn't u…

Plenty of people know their upper limit. The ability to pay 50% less if that limit applies is a feature, not a bug. (This applies to any service -- I am not affiliated with phind except as an occasional user).

Re: Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context

#270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Amazing, that's great to hear.

Is it possible to output all steps of solutions in a single copyable block? I don't want to copy 4 separate blocks.

When I use it I often give a final prompt like "Now combine the above answers together into a function that accept the following arguments...". This has worked well for my use cases.
Post reply on HN