Earlier quoted context omitted.
> basically child pornography Nothing that got banned was "basically child pornography." That's why there is blood in the water.
It was a collection of subreddits for the purpose of eroticism focused on children. It wasn't child porn, but it's as close as you can come without actually getting arrested. You're full of shit if you're trying to tell me otherwise.
Reddit takes a new direction
261–263 of 263 posts
Re: Reddit takes a new direction
#262Earlier quoted context omitted.
>The content posted to these subreddits was, for the most part, child pornography. Allow me to be blunt: Bullshit.
You never actually looked at any of the subreddits removed, did you?
I saw plenty of creepy things, but I never saw anything that could be remotely classified as "child pornography".
Re: Reddit takes a new direction
#263Reddit is changing. It's currently in a renewed and stronger Eternal September. Bastion subreddits like /r/AskScience and /r/Truereddit are reduced to junk and fads. The hope for the group of moderated subreddits (Republic of Reddit) didn't really take off, it's just a handful of submitters. The top voted comments on threads about censorship are mostly 1 to 3 months old users. And now reddit (had to) surrender to a d…
Remember, slippery slope is a fallacy. I think the admins are sending the right message - This subject is blanket banned because it's too hard to sort out the shades of gray, and it brings a unique risk to the community that other things (drugs, racism, etc) just don't. I agree that they'll be playing 'ban the sub' whack a mole, but that will happen to any UGC site of scale, the important thing is (ironically) not to…