Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
Quoted post unavailable.
Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
261–270 of 790 posts
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#262The amount of sarcasm, triteness, and personally directed anger in the comments here is disappointing.
whats the correct response? obsequiousness? doff my hat to the billionaire?
"this is a dumb business decision"
"this is seemingly hypocritical based on his previous stated intentions"
"what might the motivation be here?"
"is this legal?"
these are some of the top responses that loaded for me:
"Thin-skinned narcissist buys criticism machine."
"Elon's mask has truly cracked, and he proves he is nothing but a febrile mind who has bought into his own hype. "
" Can't wait to see how the Elon lackeys - Marc, Lex, and Jason etc. going to bend over backwards defending this. "
"LOL!!! How thin Elon's skin must be."
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#263Hrm I’m not sure this is the hypocrisy HN thinks it is. Musk wanted to stop biased moderation. He’s done so. He wanted what twitter has done previously in terms of biased moderation to be public. He’s done so. He wanted journalists to be under the same rules as other content creators. He’s done so. Is he obliged to let people promote competitors on Twitter?
This is a ban on advertising an online presence outside of Twitter, which makes the platform way less attractive to anyone who uses it as a secondary platform, as a way to communicate with followers, while mostly monetizing another platform (Instagram or FB for example). Now that they've done this, there's no guarantee they won't expand this policy in the future. If Twitter releases a short form video platform, tiktok will be banned. Maybe youtube will be banned too. Twitter has just become untrustworthy to creators.
That's all not to mention the casual users, who use multiple platforms and want to connect their friends. I've linked my Instagram to Twitter friends before, and now I'm not allowed to do it anymore.
This is a bad business decision, no two ways around it.
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#264Seems reasonable. Let's all remember the spirit of '20, everyone: Twitter is a private company, if you don't like it build your own twitter!
I mean I don’t think Musks critics are asking for the government to intervene here (well, other than those pointing out it might violates EU regs). I was pretty cynical about his purchase and Im not terribly happy about being proven right. My hope is that he gets bored with it, sells it, and it gets a boring new owner that’s less ideological.
There were left-wing critiques of twitter's moderation all of the time, but I don't recall seeing anyone on here advocating for government intervention to tweak it.
Posts like the one you're responding to are parroting the arguments without understanding what the arguments were actually against.
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#265"Thin-skinned narcissist buys criticism machine." This is not "free speech absolutism" in the slightest. It's not even business-savvy. Elon's mask has truly cracked, and he proves he is nothing but a febrile mind who has bought into his own hype.
I tried really hard to stay an Elon fan. SpaceX is a step function game changer, and Starlink was such a cool related market to break into. Now I have to go change my Twitter profiles that have been the same for ages... Has Musk never heard of the Streisand effect? I've always been bearish on TSLA. Now I think the narrative is changing. The market monopoly bull case never made sense. Every car company and nation will…
If a relationship feels like work, you should break up.
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#266(from another thread) Any attorneys want to weigh in on whether - or when - this becomes an anti-competitive/anti-trust concern, either in the US (FTC) or the EU? Related reading: * Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) Article 102, on abusive conduct by companies that have a dominant position in a market: https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/antitrust/procedures... . Any EU resident can file a co…
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#267"Thin-skinned narcissist buys criticism machine." This is not "free speech absolutism" in the slightest. It's not even business-savvy. Elon's mask has truly cracked, and he proves he is nothing but a febrile mind who has bought into his own hype.
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#268"Thin-skinned narcissist buys criticism machine." This is not "free speech absolutism" in the slightest. It's not even business-savvy. Elon's mask has truly cracked, and he proves he is nothing but a febrile mind who has bought into his own hype.
Quoted post unavailable.
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#269Influencers cross-promote their social channels all the time, since each social media network has a different audience. An influencer might post how-to videos on TikTok, re-post to YouTube shorts, then re-purpose the same content as a micro-blog threads on Twitter. There's even a cottage industry of link tree / bio landing pages that consolidate all of your social handles, featured posts, etc into one page. Are those…
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#270Worth mentioning that this policy might have suspended John Carmack for this tweet a couple days ago, announcing his resignation from Meta: https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/1603931899810004994... This is a very, very, very bad policy and shows with absolute clarity that Twitter is far from a free speech platform. Which deeply saddens me. Imagine how absurd it would be for Reddit or Hacker News to have a polic…
No, it will not get Carmack banned, because he is not promoting his FB account. He links to a news worthy post.