Earlier quoted context omitted.
The article also states that he was "telemarketing worker" without much detail about his job duties. Was the company already recording his screen and voice (if applicable) interactions with customers?
from the article > The telemarketing worker replied back two days later, “I don't feel comfortable being monitored for 9 hours a day by a camera. This is an invasion of my privacy and makes me feel really uncomfortable. that's the reason why my camera isn't on. You can already monitor all activities on my laptop and I am sharing my screen.”
Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam awarded €75K in court
261–270 of 466 posts
Re: Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam awarded €75K in court
#262Earlier quoted context omitted.
Better yet, shouldn't we just make everything free for everyone? Housing costs are outrageous. It would be great if houses were free. And food too. And cars and clothing. I guess the only problem is then everyone's wage would have to be $0 as well.
The automation is going to bring that relatively soon.
Re: Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam awarded €75K in court
#263Re: Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam awarded €75K in court
#264That seems unfortunate; the employee's best chance for collecting is if the employer continues to have business operations in the Netherlands.
Re: Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam awarded €75K in court
#265Earlier quoted context omitted.
sorry what extra work? you know the company is able to hire more people right?
You know companies have budgets right? you can not just "hire more people" and remain profitable, no profit no company. Companies are not charities created to employ people. So sure if only 1 person is off on leave most likely another person could be hired But 5 years of protected leave..... What percentage of the work force is going to be out on that? Also since it is very hard to terminate someone in the EU, what h…
slavery ended thousands years ago
Re: Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam awarded €75K in court
#266Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is why you make 50% less by the way. Not dumping on the laws, which I think are great, and are probably worth it overall, but there is a cost.
> Which is why you make 50% less by the way They make 50% less. And they don't have to pay $1000 per head for private insurance, more for other insurance, $3000/month for being able to be a roommate in a 30 m2 apartment. Also they have disability, reasonable retirement, paid vacations and everything that are pretty much nonexistent for American employees.
Re: Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam awarded €75K in court
#267Earlier quoted context omitted.
Of course that would work, but that requires the economy to not adapt itself to the new prices, which requires politicians to step in and prevent the richer people from buying up things which makes would-be families feel too uneasy about starting a family. It'd be far more desirable to return to situations where most of the budget is spent on luxury and only a little is spent on any kind of milestone, but that's a ca…
>> which requires politicians to step in Ironically politicians "stepping in" is the biggest reason cost of living is going up. Regulations preventing new housing, limiting new housing, etc. Monetary policies and massive debt fueled spending spree's causing massive inflation, draconian lock downs disrupting supply chains, irresponsible "climate" policies preventing farmers from growing food affordably, the 100's of o…
Neither bad regulations nor the free market are going to solve a lack of foresight. Worse, those regulations are largely devised by politicians in power voted by a majority of homeowners and a few ultra rich lobbyists. You might as well make a "always has been" meme out of it.
Same goes for every other of your points. If free market capitalism would solve it, it already would have.
Re: Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam awarded €75K in court
#268One more site to add to the memory hole.
Re: Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam awarded €75K in court
#269From Glassdoor for related employer: https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Chetu-Reviews-E231082.htm >> Review: “You'll discover during training week that the the company will watch over you all day, even long tenured employees are watched via their WebCam.” >> “Glassdoor Alert: Attempt to Inflate Reviews — We have evidence that someone has taken steps to artificially inflate the rating for this employer with positive re…
Between this, and them shuttering any official EU accounts or presence after the award, I really foubt they will pay the award, and it seems unlikely they were contributing or collecting any taxes related to the employment.
Re: Dutch employee fired by U.S. firm for shutting off webcam awarded €75K in court
#270Earlier quoted context omitted.
from the article > The telemarketing worker replied back two days later, “I don't feel comfortable being monitored for 9 hours a day by a camera. This is an invasion of my privacy and makes me feel really uncomfortable. that's the reason why my camera isn't on. You can already monitor all activities on my laptop and I am sharing my screen.”
That does not answer the question regarding interacting with customers.
The answer is yes.