Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure but that doesn’t mean they should be banned for life . If you commit a crime as a minor does that follow you around for the rest of your life? At least where I live, it doesn’t.
> doesn’t mean they should be banned for life. It doesn't mean that it shouldn't though, either. I can't imagine any other way around this that doesn't amount to forcing a company to provide a service to someone they have rational reasons to not trust, which seems like globally at least it could cause more problems than it solves. To be clear I'm not saying we shouldn't encourage a company to re-consider when the per…
Nothing wrong with that. Just do it. Force them to provide service to the kids they banned for life due to frivolous violations of contracts nobody really reads anyway.
> it's hard to see how they should be forced to
It's really easy actually. Someone getting permabanned from a service for the unforgivable offense of being a child is completely out of proportion.
We already force them to provide service to the disabled and impaired without discrimination. It's okay to do it. Corporations don't have feelings. Nobody really cares how hard life is for the hundred billion dollar corporation either.